11/26/2006

Gibson Inquiry - press release

Gibson Inquiry website

"PRESS RELEASE
10pm Sunday 26th November

-BEGINS-

The Parliamentary Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) today releases its Inquiry Report “Inquiry into the status of CFS/ME and research into causes and treatment”. The report also known as the Gibson Inquiry has been ongoing for almost a year.

The Group is an offshoot of the All Party Parliamentary Group on ME and the members are as follows

Dr Ian Gibson MP (Chair)
Dr Richard Taylor MP (Vice-Chair)
Ms Ann Cryer MP (Secretary)
Rt Hon Michael Meacher MP
Dr Des Turner MP
Mr David Taylor MP
Lord Turnberg
The Countess of Mar
Baroness Cumberlege

Over the past year, the Inquiry has received written submission of evidence from medical experts, scientists, patients and patient groups across the UK and internationally. The Inquiry also held 5 oral hearings details of which are on the website www.erythos.com/gibsonenquiry.

The Group undertook this Inquiry after meeting with patient groups in 2005. CFS/ME is arguably
one of the most contentious illnesses in medicine today. Even the name is a point of contention.
Patient Groups refer to themselves as the ‘ME Community’ and consider CFS to be a term invented
by psychiatrists who do not believe their condition exists. Meanwhile the situation in the UK is that due to a lack of research there are only symptomatic treatments available and indeed these have proved useful in some controlled trials.

It is treated with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Pacing, where the patient paces their energy and Graded Exercise Therapy (GET). These treatments are useful to people with a number of long term debilitating illnesses but are usually prescribed as well as medical treatment not instead of.

The Gibson Inquiry argues that we must invest massively in research into biomedical models of
this illness. It is still unclear whether CFS/ME is one illness with a spectrum of severity or whether it is two separate illnesses. The most severely affected are least affected by the existing symptomatic treatments. And indeed many of the most severely affected find GET massively worsens their condition. Researching the possibility of sub groups is essential so sufferers can get the best treatment.

One problem with investigating CFS/ME is that the ‘Oxford Criteria’, the guideline for selecting
patients for research trials, is very vague and focuses on fatigue rather than the numerous other
symptoms of CFS/ME. As such, the knowledge we do have of the illness may have been gleaned from people who did not genuinely have the condition.

NICE has just finished consulting on their draft guidelines for treating CFS/ME. These guidelines
have been widely criticised by patient groups and by the APPG on ME. Chair Des Turner described
them in a meeting last week as ‘not fit for man nor beast’ Dr Ian Gibson MP of the Inquiry described them as ‘useless’.

ME patient groups have questioned the independence of reviewers in previous Inquiries and believe that the psychosocial school has received an unfair historical advantage in term of funding for research.

The Inquiry calls on the government to rectify this historical bias toward a psychological model
and commission a genuinely independent panel of medical experts consisting of virologists,
immunologists, geneticists, biochemists etc whocan asses the international and UK evidence objectively.The inquiry also calls on the MRC to encourage research projects into a biomedical model.

The government invested £8.5 million in treatment centres around the UK, these centres should also be used a for research programmes. The UK is supposed to be currently focusing efforts on
science technology and innovation. However the UK is falling behind the rest of the world when it
comes to CFS/ME and it is the patients in the UK who are paying the price.

There is also a benefits issue. While the illness remains undefined and perceived by many as
psychological, patients find it almost impossible to receive higher rate DLA despite in many cases
being severely incapacitated, house bound and in need of 24 hour care.

Dr Ian Gibson MP Chair of the Inquiry says

“At last there is an Inquiry which identifies the seriousness of CFS/ME. For too long the patient
voice has been left out of the debate. I hope that our Inquiry will highlight the difficult issues surrounding this illness and the urgent need further research. There is a wealth of published and evidence based research on this subject, some in the UK but mostly internationally. Canada and the US are leaving us way behind on this issue. We are a Group on ME and even in our group there has been conflicting opinions on the evidence. One thing is sure, we have a fantastic opportunity here with our Inquiry and the new NICE guideline to really begin to recognise this illness for what it is to look for causes and new treatments and to really build consensus amongst doctors and patient groups”

-ENDS-

Gibson Inquiry - report to be published tonight, November 26

The report of the Gibson Inquiry into the state of ME research in the UK will be published tonight at 10pm on the inquiry's official website at

Gibson website

An embargoed copy of the report has already been delivered to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence to meet NICE's November 24 deadline for receipt of responses to their draft guideline on ME/CFS.

8/10/2006

FIFTH DAY – Tuesday July 18 Andy Burnham MP, Minister of State for Delivery and Quality, Department of Health

This summary of the Minister's presentations, and the question and answer session which followed, has been prepared by The ME Association's representative at the hearing.

Presentation and answers to questions from Andy Burnham MP, Minister of State for Delivery and Quality, Department of Health.

Andy Burnham:

Opened by explaining that he was new to his post at the Department of Health, where he takes particular responsibility for research. However, there is a considerable degree of shared responsibility across the various ministerial portfolios at the DoH.

Stated that his knowledge about the illness was partly as a result of listening to the experiences of people he knew who had had it, some of whom had experienced 'terrible problems'.

Reviewed the various 'positive developments' - ie the MRC research strategy; new NHS services and the NICE guidelines - that had taken place as a result of the 2002 Chief Medical Officer's Report into ME/CFS, but acknowldged that there was 'a lot more that could and should be done in all parts of the country'.

Felt that one of the most significant new developments that would 'change the landscape' was the NICE guidelines that will produce advice for doctors on the management of ME/CFS.

Outlined the current timetable at NICE- ie draft clinical guidance in September; a consultation process during November; with the aim of producing final guidance in April 2007.

After his short presentation, Andy Burnham took questions from the Inquiry team:

The Countess of Mar raised the point that all too often people with ME are still being denigrated by GPs and Consultants. And, although the NHS is now supposed to be patient-led, nobody appears to be listening to this particular group of patients.

Being told they have a problem that is one of abnormal illness beliefs rather than a biomedical illness is unacceptable. And there was far too much research funding going into psychological research instead of into biomedical research.

Andy Burnham replied by stating that he 'would be surprised' if there was still a high level of disbelief but acknowledged that it did still exist in some sections of the medical profession. He felt that information and education of GPs was 'terribly important' but did not explain how he felt this should be accomplished. He was also 'surprised' by the number of people - possibly around 250,000 - who are thought to have ME/CFS.

Lord Turnberg (a former President of the Royal College of Physicians) wanted to know about research. How much was the Government spending? Would they be willing to spend more? And what are the views of doctors?

Andy Burnham stated that the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Dept of Health had together funded research costing £4.8 million in the period since 1997 (MRC = £3.1 million; DoH = £1.7 million).

Two projects - the PACE and FINE trials costing a total of £4.2 million - had obviously taken 'the Lion's share', and he went on to give a very brief description of these two clinical trials, which he described as being 'focussed on improving the quality of life' for people with ME/CFS.

Dr Gibson also felt that it would be a good idea to carry out research on the views of doctors.

[Point of information: The most recent study to assess medical opinion found that approximately 50% of GPs believed a condition called CFS exists and 50% did not. Of those doctors who did supply information to patients - presumably because they believed the illness exists - most of it came from The ME Association. Reference: Primary healthcare provision and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a survey of patients' and General Practitioners' beliefs. BMC Family Practice - in press but provisionally published on-line ]

Michael Meacher MP wanted to know about research directed at the cause of the illness and pointed out that the focus was too much on coping and living with ME rather than dealing with the cause. He also felt that one of the problems at the MRC was their peer review process.

Andy Burnham replied by stating that two population based studies and recently been funded - those being carried out by Professor Creed and Professor K Bhui.

[Point of information: these are both epidemiological studies. They are not specifically examining the aetiology and/or pathogenesis of ME/CFS]

Andy Burnham also pointed out that the MRC is there to take 'science led decisions' and they are not there to be influnced by politicians. He felt that a climate which encourages the right type of applications needs to be created.

The Countess of Mar asked about the financial problems affecting some NHS services, including the fact that posts are being blocked, with particular reference to the situation in Hereford and Worcester.

Andy Burnham explained that the £8.5 million DoH money was there to 'pump prime' the development of new services and that it 'would be a nonsense if these pump primed services were now allowed to dry up due to a lack of funding'.

Afterwards, Dr Gibson and his team were thanked for all the work that they had put into the Inquiry so far.

7/14/2006

FOURTH DAY - MONDAY JULY 10 Dr Nigel Speight, Consultant Paediatrician at Durham University Hospital

Dr Nigel Speight was not speaking from a prepared script - but he has kindly provided the following summary of his presentation. Dr Speight is also paediatric medical adviser to The ME Association.

SUMMARY OF VERBAL PRESENTATION
TO THE GIBSON ENQUIRY
10TH JULY 2006

INTRODUCTION

I started by mentioning my experience of paediatric ME/CFS over the last 20 years.

Since the death of the late Alan Franklin from Chelmsford, I am probably currently the paediatrician with the most experience of this condition in the U.K.

I have an accumulated total of over 200 personal cases in the North East and have seen around 150 further cases nationwide, including Scotland, the Isle of Man and Northern Ireland. These latter cases were ones where I was called in for a second opinion by the local paediatrician because of the severity of the case or, more commonly, where I was asked for a second opinion by the family and GP because of difficulties in getting a diagnosis locally.

What can paediatric ME/CFS teach us about the basic controversy as to whether ME is a physical or psychological condition?

I started by saying that children sometimes have a knack of going to the heart of the matter as per the Bible “Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings…………..”

STORY 1: A 6 year old girl was told by her Professor of Paediatrics that there was nothing wrong with her because all her tests were normal. She responded quite logically by saying “perhaps I have got a condition for which you have not yet invented a test”!

STORY 2: A 14 year old doctor’s son in Australia developed ME and over the next year was taken all over Australia for second opinions. Someone said to him at the end of this year that he must have found out a lot from having seen so many clever doctors. He responded “not much really, they don’t seem to understand it, but there is one thing I have noticed – it is a condition which seems to provoke an acute emotional disturbance in doctors confronted with it”!

Regarding the basic controversy of ME being a physical illness or psychologically caused, I think the evidence in paediatrics can supplement all the evidence from adult ME and strengthen it because the issues in paediatric practice are clearer and more black and white. When one sees an 8 year old child who is functioning happily at school and at home who is then struck down by the condition in the total absence of any other psychological problems, it would seem self evident that this is primarily a physical condition.

Similarly, the experience of severe cases in young people supports the same thesis.

If ME/CFS was a basically psychological disease then in the case of a severely affected bed bound young person there would have to be such concrete evidence of severe psycho-pathology to cause such disability that it would be blindingly obvious. However, such evidence is almost invariably lacking.

Supplementary explanation re Power Point Presentation

Slide 12 – Map of Britain. The yellow dots on this map represent cases that had to either travel to Durham or had to be visited by me for the purposes of getting a diagnosis of ME in the absence of one locally, and/or providing extra support and advice for the local professionals.

The red dots all represent cases in which Child Protection Proceedings were commenced and families were threatened with removal of their affected child, usually as a result of the local paediatrician either not believing in ME in the first place or failing to diagnose it in a particular child and initiating proceedings on the basis of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. (Since this slide was made the number of yellow and red dots has increased by about 30% each).

Slides 13 and 14. Sarah’s case demonstrates how even very severe cases can make a total recovery and raise the question as to whether or not immunoglobulin therapy might yet be proved to be effective in this condition. I mentioned that had research in this area not been dominated by the psychological view for the last 30 years, then the question about immunoglobulin would have been settled long ago.

Slide of 14 year old girl doing aerobics (consent given for use of this slide).
This girl from Northern Ireland was participating in an aerobathon while unfortunately incubating a dose of flu. Three days after this photo was taken she bed ridden with severe ME and spent the next two years tube fed as an in-patient in her local paediatric ward. On her 16th birthday she was discharged from paediatrics and although she remained an extremely severe case no adult physician has ever agreed to accept responsibility for her care. Her current situation is that at the age of 23 she is still bed ridden, tube fed, catheterised, and nursed on a ripple bed. She receives total nursing care from her mother and the only doctor responsible for her case is her broad- shouldered general practitioner. She still has total body pain and only sleeps 4 hours out of 24. This case demonstrates the reality faced by severe cases of ME and the tendency for the medical profession to abdicate responsibility for them.

Slides of 3 graphs. These are slides showing the progress of the severity of paediatric ME/CFS over a 6-8 year period in a consecutive series of 49 cases from North Durham. The first slide shows the relatively optimistic picture in that about a third of cases make a virtually total recovery, usually over 2-3 years. The next slide shows that a minority of cases (7 out of 49) were severe at the time of follow up. The third slide shows the larger number of in between cases who over all were improving but were not yet cured. These slides show how unpredictable a condition this is and how wide can be the fluctuations both of relapses and improvements.

The remaining slides contain extracts from the CMO’s report especially with respect to paediatric ME/CFS. I did not have time to cover all these slides in my presentation to the enquiry.

Dr. Nigel Speight. 19/07/2006



















































FOURTH DAY - Monday July 10 Professor Malcolm Hooper, Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry, The University of Sunderland













































FOURTH DAY - Monday July 10 Dr William Weir, Consultant Phsyician and ME Specialist

This summary of Dr Weir's presentation has been prepared by the representative of The ME Association who attended the hearing.

Presentation by Dr William Weir: Consultant Physician and ME Specialist in London.

NB: Dr Weir will be the main speaker at The MEA Open Medical Meeting in Chester on Saturday 9 September - more details on our main website.

Dr Weir:

Described how he came to be involved in seeing ME/CFS patients through his work as a specialist in infectious diseases both here and abroad.

Explained how it was not uncommon to find people returning from tropical countries with this illness - sometimes referred to as 'tropical neurasthenia' - following an infective episode.

Emphasised that these were not the sort of people who had anything to gain from sick role behaviour.

Provided some interesting historical accounts of how illnesses such as syphilis and Parkinson's disease (once thought of as a man's natural desire to masturbate!) had originally been mis-labelled as psychosocial problems - mainly because their cause at the time was unknown.

Dismissed the way in which ME/CFS was being increasingly termed a biopsychosocial illness - often because this was an easy philophosical position to take when doctors do not understand the cause of an illness.

Stated quite clearly that ME/CFS has a biomedical basis that is not being properly researched.

Described how mind and body are closely interlinked and explained how non-drug management approaches such as meditation could be helpful to some people.

Concluded that bad management often resulted in poor prognosis.

FOURTH DAY - Monday July 10 Professor Anthony Pinching, National Clinical Lead for CFS/ME at the Department of Health

Professor Pinching was not speaking from a prepared script - so an exact transcript is not available.



























7/10/2006

FIFTH DAY – Tuesday July 18 AGENDA (change of time and venue announced)

Group on Scientific Research into
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)


Oral Hearing 5
Tuesday 18th of July 2006, 12:30pm – 1pm
Room N, Portcullis House


Note change of time and venue


Agenda


• Welcome and Opening of 5th Oral Hearing
Dr. Ian Gibson MP, Chair of GSRME

• Questions and Answers: Andy Burnham MP, Minister of State for Delivery and Quality, Department of Health


• Concluding Remarks
Dr. Ian Gibson MP, Chair of GSRME


P.S. We hope to have Sir Liam Donaldson, Chief Medical Officer from the Department of Health, present at the hearing.

6/25/2006

THIRD DAY - 7 JUNE 2006 Professor Trudie Chalder, Professor of Cognitive Behaviour Psychotherapy, King's College, London

































THIRD DAY - 7 JUNE 2006 Professor Peter White, Professor of Psychological Medicine, Barts and The London, Queen Mary University of London





































THIRD DAY - 7 JUNE 2006 Dr Vance Spence, Chairman, ME Research UK

ME/CFS scientific research: CMO report and beyond

A presentation to the Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (Gibson Parliamentary Inquiry) by ME Research UK Chairman Dr Vance Spence on 7th June 2006 at Portcullis House, Westminster, UK.



There are a great many sick people out there — and some have had ME for many years, myself included. Yet, they have not lost their spirit, and the fact that this Group has been established is a testament not only to scale of the problem but to their feistiness and persistence in the face of great adversity.



The slide shows the terms of reference for the group — including an assessment of "the progress of scientific research on ME since the publication of the Chief Medical Officer's Working Group Report into CFS/ME in 2002" — and I propose to address this specific remit in three sections, as well as I can in the time available:
Part I — Progress since Chief Medical Officer's report
 Scientific publications
Part II — Specific Reasons for lack of progress
 Case definition
 Influence of the biopsychosocial model
 Biomedical research findings undervalued and unsupported by funding
Part III — How can we move forward?

Progress since CMO report

Looking at progress in scientific research since January 2002, we can see that it has been patchy and relatively small-scale. The MEDLINE database lists 783 Chronic Fatigue Syndrome "publications" from anywhere in the world during the past 52 months, and of these 55 are clinical trials, only 6 of which were from the UK. Looking at vaguely-defined experimental studies, only 57 were from the UK in this time: most of these came from the London Medical Schools in which the biopsychosocial model predominates, while 10 discrete studies emanated from 2 privately-funded research groups and another 6 were one-off studies at various locations.



This pattern hardly constitutes an engine room for biomedical investigation of the illness, and compares unfavourably with other illnesses (e.g., in the 52 months there have been 6231 publications on MS, and 48,110 on diabetes). So, my claim is that overall ME/CFS research in the UK (and worldwide) is very small scale, that there are comparatively few "biomedical" studies, and that while hypotheses abound there is often little data to support them. Any objective observer would conclude that the Chief Medical Officer's report of 2002 has had a minimal effect on the drive to uncover the causes of ME/CFS.

Specific Reasons for lack of Progress

There are many reasons for the lack of progress, but given the time constraint I propose to mention briefly three central issues: problems with case definition, the influence of the biopsychosocial model overlaid on the illness, and the lack of attention (both in professional and funding terms) given to biomedical research findings.

Case definition issues

ME and CFS and ME/CFS mean different things to different people. As I say over and over again, this problem colours all debate on ME, yet rather like the whiteness of a wall it is often not recognised as a colour at all. Much of the background has been described in written submissions to the committee, and in previous presentations but the essential point is that although the term myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) — involving an infectious onset, specific neuromuscular symptoms and signs, and a unique post-exercise component — has a scientific history involving epidemic and sporadic forms, "ME" today has come to be seen as a lay term used by patient organisations and patients themselves, while chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been adopted by medical journals and healthcare professionals, and there are even several CFS case-definitions which select for different patient groups! At present, the composite term ME/CFS is used, though the conjunction of the two terms is still problematic.



This next slide is an attempt to describe the problem graphically — though we must be aware that this is only schematic, a way of visualising the problem which may be more or less complex in reality.



While the greatest portion of the circle represents the 'set' of patients with chronic fatigue (CF) — which might represent between 1 and 4% of the population — you can see that the set of patients with CFS (i.e., those with 6-months 'fatigue' plus 4 symptoms) is much smaller (estimated to be 0.2 to 0.4% of the population in the CMO report of 2002), while those with ME as described in the older scientific literature might represent a subset of CFS itself, since post-exercise 'fatigue' is a key element in their illness (population estimates are unavailable for this subset since healthcare professionals no longer diagnose ME per se). The important point is that the each slice melds into the next, and that — in the absence of a full clinical assessment — the popular press, healthcare professionals and medical researchers may easily be deceived about the placing of a particular patient in a particular diagnostic category. For researchers the problem is particularly acute since what confidence can they have in the diagnostic discreteness of their patients when the diagnostic construct "CFS" is so broad?

The diagnostic mess that is ME/CFS is illustrated by our own research in 2004 which found that distinct differences could be found between three groups of patients all of whom fulfilled criteria for the 1994 CDC Fukuda definition of CFS. As this paper (Kennedy et al, 2004) says, "The specificity of the CFS case definition should be improved to define more homogeneous groups of patients for the purposes of treatment and research." This view was echoed by Prof. Leonard Jason who published in 2004 an excellent review on the need for subgrouping of the over-broad "diagnostic category" CFS.



Influence of the biopsychosocial model of ME/CFS

The Chief Medical Officer's report of 2002 defined the biopsychosocial model as a "...model of pathophysiology, applicable to all disease, suggests that once an illness has started its expression is affected by beliefs, coping styles, and behaviours, while consequential physiological and psychological effects act in some ways to maintain and/or modify the disease process". The operative words in that definition are "applicable to all disease", for its non-specific therapeutic techniques, such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), are indeed used in many illnesses for symptom management. But in most illnesses psychosocial techniques are adjuncts to contemporaneous biomedical research, whereas in ME/CFS the biopsychosocial model seems to have developed a life of its own, hoovering up attention and funding, apparently at the expense of biomedical investigation. It is for this reason that we said in a letter to the Lancet in May 2006:

The central point... is that, for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (and there are some 20,000 members of support groups in the UK alone), the biopsychosocial model offers relatively little, yet it dominates the canvas in terms of research funding and exposure in professional journals instead of being a small part of the overall clinical and scientific picture (Abbot NC, Spence VA. Lancet 2006; 367:1574).



The evidential basis of the CBT model for ME/CFS, shown in the slide above, consists of 8 discrete RCTs, 3 "negative" for the intervention and 5 "positive". While there are arguments for and against each of these trials, I think we can agree that this constitutes a far-from-impressive evidence base, particularly when set beside other evidence bases and beside patients' reports and surveys.



What I want to stress is that the biopsychosocial model — which even its supporters admit is not a cure — is very influential. It colours the perception of the illness across the board — from official reports, such as the Chief Medical Officer's report mentioned above, to government agencies such as the Dept of Work and Pensions which is producing its new electronic guidelines at present, to research funding bodies such as the Medical Research Council. Indeed, the Medical Research Council has recently provided substantial funding for two biopsychosocial investigations — the FINE Trial (designed to increase activity and challenge dysfunctional illness beliefs), and the PACE (Pacing, Activity, and Cognitive behaviour therapy) trial — yet, as far as we know, has rejected most if not all applications for funding for biomedical investigation.



I end this section with a quote from an editorial in the British Medical Journal in 2002, and highlight the crucial phrase: "there is a consensus among patients that if resources were allocated towards rigorous material empirical biochemical research it would be... preferable in their eyes to promulgating an… incomplete paradigm as though it were a cure".



Biomedical research findings undervalued and unsupported by funding

The third reason for lack of progress is that biomedical research findings into ME/CFS get ignored and undervalued. Yet, they exist, and there is substantial evidence that, despite the apparent heterogeneity of the patient group, biomedical researchers can uncover a range of interesting anomalies. I have time here to discuss only a few key areas.

a) Blood flow to the brain
A singular paper that has greatly interested me over the years came in 1994, reporting the remarkable finding of reduced blood flow in the brain. The authors concluded that brainstem perfusion of 43 ME/CFS patients was significantly lower than controls (p <0.0001) and patients with major depression (p<0.005). Isn't it important that this work be reproduced and extended?



b) Orthostatic Intolerance 
In an article entitled "Standing Up For ME" in The Biologist in 2004, Professor Julian Stewart and I outlined some of the "physical" arguments surrounding orthostatic intolerance in the illness. This whole area of orthostasis is extremely complex and little understood. Might there be a problem with peripheral blood vessels in ME/CFS patients? Shouldn't we find out?



c) Oxidation
The ME Research UK-funded unit at University of Dundee has found a pattern of significantly increased oxidative stress in ME/CFS patients that are related to symptoms, and these findings have now been supported by at least four other research groups worldwide who have also shown excessive free radicals in blood, urine and muscle tissues of ME/CFS patients. Isn't it important to discover the source(s) of these molecules, whether from excessive immune activity, chronic infections or abnormalities within muscle tissue?





d) Inflammation
There is also evidence that patients have detectable abnormalities in neutrophils (the most abundant of white blood cells) — specifically a larger proportion of dying (apoptotic) cells than in healthy subjects — consistent with an activated inflammatory process which is possibly the consequence of a past or present infection. Might some people with 'CFS' have a chronic inflammatory disorder, albeit an unusual one?



e) Gene studies
Recent developments in gene research in ME/CFS have suggested dysregulation of genes involved in immune pathways, supporting the many reports in the literature of immune dysregulation in the pathogenesis of ME/CFS. This research in the UK has been supported by smaller ME/CFS charities and private individuals, but why not by central agencies such as the Medical Research Council with class 1 funding?

Furthermore, fascinating one-off results covering many of the prominent symptoms of ME/CFS continue to be published by research groups worldwide: these include reduction of brain serotonin transporters in relation to pain (Yamamoto et al, 2003), delayed gastric emptying (Burnett et al, 2004), and altered muscle excitability in response to exercise (Jammes et al, 2005). One particular recent one-off finding I'd like to highlight concerns the finding of increased vascular stiffness in ME/CFS patients from my own Unit at the University of Dundee, which fits in with our provisional hypothesis that at least some ME/CFS patients might have increased cardiovascular risk.





My purpose here is not to answer the questions above, but to show that biomedical investigations can uncover, within a proportion of ME/CFS patients, biological anomalies that might well help to explain many of the clinical features associated with the illness, and might also indicate areas for therapeutic treatment. The key point that I want to make to the committee is that breakthroughs in biomedical research generally follow funding (since without it there is no possibility of starting the exploration!). Yes, many investigations to date have been low-level, and in none of these areas are the findings conclusive as yet. BUT some (or all) of these areas might well lead to a breakthrough in understanding and treating the illness, and without support for biomedical research we will never find out.

Since it is left to the smaller charities to progress the agenda, we do what we can as shown in the slides listing ME Research UK's current funded projects. But much more could and should be done. And the first step is for the larger funding agencies including the Medical Research Council to cease being hypnotised by non-curative "incomplete paradigms" and to begin prioritising basic biomedical research.





The Way Forward

In conclusion, we wish to make the following points:

* Doing nothing is not an option
* Thousands of people remain chronically unwell since the CMO report
* The perception that biopsychosocial models are the answer to ME/CFS should be challenged
* The Biomedical Research Agenda should be expedited by:
Ring-fencing central funds for basic biomedical research
Inviting "new blood" researchers into the field
* Recent gene work is a good example of what can be done IF resources can be found to get to the root of the problem

THIRD DAY - 7 JUNE 2006 Dr Jonathan Kerr, Senior Lecturer in Inflammation, Dept of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, St George's University of London







































































THIRD DAY - 7 JUNE 2006 Dr Anthony Cleare, Section of Neurobiology of Mood Disorders, Inst of Psychiatry, King's College London











































SECOND DAY - 10 May 2006 Professor Richard Baker, Chair of the NICE CFS/ME Guideline Development Group































SECOND DAY - 10 May 2006 Dr Byron Hyde, Chairman of the Nightingale Research Foundation

REQUESTED

SECOND DAY - 10 May 2006 Dr Bruce Carruthers, Consultant in Internal Medicine and Principal Author of the Canadian Guidelines

REQUESTED

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 List of Participants

1. Beth Llewellyn, Member, The ME Association

2. Dr Charles Shepherd, Medical Adviser, The ME Association

3. Trish Taylor, Chair of Trustees, Action for ME

4. Sheila McGovern, Trustee, MEACH Trust

5. Sue Sherlock, Founder and Trustee, MEACH Trust

6. Jane Colby, Executive Director, The Young ME Sufferers Trust

7. Colin Parratt, Case History Research on ME (CHROME)

8. Greg Crowhurst, The 25% ME Group (for people who are severely affected by ME)

9. Ray Briggs, Fund for Osteopathic Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (FORME)

10. Dr Raymond Perrin, Osteopathic Practitioner, founder of The Perrin Clinics

11. Mary-Jane Willows, Chief Executive, Association of Young People with ME

12. Dr Angela Kennedy, The One Click Group

13. Jane Bryant, The One Click Group

14. Rosemary Whinnall, Member, Worcestershire ME Support Group

15. Jill Pigott, Secretary, Worcestershire ME Support Group

16. Christine Harrison, Trustee, Blue Ribbon Action for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (BRAME)

17. Tanya Harrison, Trustee, Blue Ribbon Action for Myalgic Encephalomyelits (BRAME)

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Beth Llewellyn, Member, The ME Association

PRESENTATION BY BETH LLEWELLYN
ME SUFFERER AND MEMBER OF THE ME ASSOCIATION.

Everyone in this room has had their dreams. At the age of 18, I certainly had mine. I was a college student, studying Drama and Dance. I taught Dance at our local Youth Club, won Welsh Championships, and I worked at weekends in a local store.

I had an active social life, and many friends with whom to enjoy my spare time.

But my world was Dance.

It was my future here in Britain and later in America. I have an American passport and relatives living over there.

My dream was to dance around the world.

In the first week of February 2001, my nightmare began. I thought I had flu, but it didn’t seem to develop into what I would consider to be full-blown flu.

I was away from college until February 14th – St. Valentine’s Day, when I went into college to give my boyfriend his card. My outing lasted about an hour.

I was in so much pain I had to return home.

I remained at home until February 27th when I was admitted to our local hospital with suspected meningitis. I was there for a week, before being discharged, although my pain was still severe and I was beginning to shake so much I could hardly stand.

When the consultant discharged me, he said I had a virus and would recover, but I was welcome to return should I need to.

At home and resting, I gradually felt a little better and on March 24th I returned to my part-time weekend job. I made plans to go back to college on the following Monday.

Things didn’t quite turn out that way.

I had to go home with severe head pain and ended up in bed, vomiting. I was hospitalised again and within 10 minutes I was given a lumbar puncture as meningitis was again suspected.

This time I was there for three weeks. I had endless blood tests, brain scans, MRI scans, acupuncture – you name it, I had it.

At the end of the three weeks, I was discharged from the hospital as they decided I was still recovering from a virus and if I remained in the hospital any longer, I would probably catch something else which might make me worse!

I was sent home with propranolol, a beta-blocking drug, which really had no effect on me. I was still trembling, had severe pain all over my body and I began to have involuntary spasms.

My uncle was then Access Officer for our local Council and he joked about getting me a wheelchair.

By May 1st 2001 I was in that wheelchair and I stayed in it for three and a half years.

I still need it now at times, after five full years of this illness.

At no time during this three-month period did anyone mention ME to me or to my Mother. We were left completely in the dark. I was getting worse. I couldn’t stand. I had to use the wheelchair in the house. My Mother had to do everything for me.

I was 18 and thought I would never walk again, let alone dance.

By typing “spasm” into Google, my Mother came across Fibromyalgia. Because of the muscle and joint pain and I was suffering, we thought maybe this was the answer and asked our GP to refer me to a rheumatologist who diagnosed CFS/ME.

We had a long talk with the Rheumatologist and told him of the disbelief of our GP, and the whole practice, and he sent a rather harsh report to the GP recommending that I be sent to The Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Disease in Bath for a Pain Management Course.

It was now August and I as no better. My GP persuaded me to go to our local hospital, to their psychiatric centre where I underwent 2 years of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). I felt dreadful about this because I knew my illness was physical, not mental. We were not aware at that time what options were open to us and, as my Mother had had to give up work to care for me, we had to put in a claim for benefits.

Fear put me through hour after hour of CBT, which if anything just made my realise that my illness was physical and not mental. After one hour of treatment and an hour travelling, I would be flat on my back until the next appointment.

By now I had no quality of life. I was too ill to see the friends who had stuck by me through all this. We had to turn them away. My family, except for my Mother and Grandmother didn’t believe I was ill. They had read so many articles in Sunday supplements about miraculous cures and psychological conditions that they began to accuse my Mother of trying to lock me away from the world.

My days were spent on a day-bed in our living room. I was scared to go into my bedroom because I was having nightmares and I thought if I got into my real bed, things would get worse.

Life was endless pain. We tried everything we could. Tens machine. Homeopathic remedies. Acupuncture. Massage. But nothing worked. My body was closing down and my world was pain.

As I mentioned, during this time my Mother had applied for benefits for me. I was in no condition to fill in the endless forms myself. My short-term memory was gone, my cognitive function was blown away and there was no way I could have even contemplated filling in the forms.

A Doctor came to see me for my DLA claim, and on his word, I was only awarded low care. This meant my Mother could not claim for being my Carer. His report on my symptoms in no way described how ill I was and it took 12 months, a tribunal hearing and a whole load of stress before I was awarded full care and mobility.

I travelled all over England and Wales to see different Doctors and eventually I was diagnosed as having ME. I was told there was no cure. We paid for endless blood and muscle tests but, when the recommendations were sent to my GP, he refused to follow them up.

After a year of waiting, I eventually had an assessment and went to Bath for a Pain Management Course – a three week residential course. My Mother telephoned to them and told them I was severely ill and she wondered how I would cope with the course but they just said they were there to teach me how to “cope”. So we travelled to Bath and I settled in.

I finished the first day, with difficulty, but on the second day after a morning of Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) I collapsed.

My Mother came to Bath and took me home.

The Consultant later said that I was far too ill for the course and shouldn’t have been there.

I have an open invitation to return, but still don’t feel I am in any way ready for something like that.

This course was my last hope. I spent a year dreaming of a pain-free life and it all exploded in my face.

I have spent over five years in isolation, in pain, with no quality of life because there are no real guidelines on diagnosis and treatment.

A recent research study in Wales showed that over 62% of GP’s did not believe in a diagnosis of ME/CFS. If there was more research into the physical causes of ME, our GPs would be able to put aside their psychiatric bias, the MRC would not be wasting some two million plus pounds on the PACE and FINE trials, which once again will end up pushing CBT and GET, treatments I have tried and which have done my absolutely no good at all.

We need research to release people like me from this dreadful illness.

I need to see this illness recognised properly and I need a future.

As things stand, even though I can now stand and walk for short periods, I can see no normal future for me in our society.

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Dr Charles Shepherd, Medical Adviser, The ME Association

A more detailed summary of the clinical and pathological evidence that support the World Health Organisation classification of ME/CFS as a neurological disease in contained in a new information leaflet from The ME Association. Please contact our office for further details: tel: 01280 818968.

PRESENTATION BY DR CHARLES SHEPHERD
MEDICAL ADVISER TO THE ME ASSOCIATION

THREE KEY POINTS ON THE NEUROLOGY OF ME

1 CLINICAL EVIDENCE

People with ME have a variety of neurological symptoms. These include cognitive dysfunction; autonomic dysfunction, dysequilibrium; sensory disturbances; and alcohol intolerance.

The very disabling fatiguability – both physical and cognitive – that they experience has similar features to the central (ie brain) fatigue that is found in some other neurological conditions (Chaudhuri and Behan 2004) such as multiple sclerosis. There may be similar pathological mechanisms involved (Heesen et al, 2006).

Some people with ME have more severe neurological symptoms – including atypical seizures, double vision, loss of speech and loss of swallowing – as was acknowledged in section 4.2.1.2 of the Chief Medical Officer’s report.

Despite ME being renamed and redefined as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a term which covers a much wider range of clinical presentations, the World Health Organisation classifies ME, CFS and post-viral fatigue syndrome (PVFS) as neurological disorders in G93.3 of ICD10.

2 SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE

There is growing evidence of significant abnormalities in the brain involving both structure and function. These findings are not consistent with the psychosocial model of causation that is favoured by many psychiatrists.

Among the most important findings to date are:

• Two recent studies demonstrating a significant reduction in the volume of gray matter (de Lange et al 2005; Okada et al 2004) in the brain. de Lange et al reported that the decline in gray matter volume was linked to the reduction in physical activity. Okada et al reported that the reduction paralleled the severity of fatigue.
• MRI brain scans demonstrating punctuate areas of high signal intensity in the cerebral white matter. These are more common in patients who have no psychiatric co-morbidity (Keenan, 1999) and are significantly related to functional status (Cook et al, 2001).
• Changes in the activity of brain chemical transmitters (neurotransmitters), in particular serotonin (Badawy et al, 2003) and dopamine modulation (Georgiades et al, 2003) and abnormalities involving brain chemicals such as carnitine (Kuratsune et al, 2002) and choline (Puri et al, 2002).
• Blood flow studies demonstrating a significant overall decrease (Yoshiuchi et al, 2006) as well as a more specific perfusion defect to a part of the brain known as the brain stem (Costa et al, 1995).
• Evidence of hypothalamic dysfunction – a key part of the brain that regulates a number of body functions including temperature control; hormonal output, in particular the production of cortisol from the adrenal glands (Papanicolaou et al, 2004); and the autonomic nervous system (Freeman, 2002).
• Cerebrospinal fluid analysis demonstrating elevations of protein and/or white blood cells (Natelson et al, 2005) – an abnormality suggesting immune system dysregulation within the central nervous system.

3 THE NEED FOR ACTION

Despite all the clinical and research evidence there is still a great reluctance on the part of government departments, the medical establishment (ie the Royal Colleges) and research funders (ie the MRC) to accept that ME has a neurological basis.

In fact, we are currently dealing with a situation where a neurologist advising the DWP on new medical guidance for benefit assessments is reported (in a letter dated 13 December 2005 from Anne McGuire MP, PUS at the DWP, to a constituency MP) as stating that he ‘.. is of the opinion that CFS/ME is not a neurological condition’ .

Consequently, there is not a climate of confidence or support for neurological research into either the cause or management of ME here in the UK. And it is not therefore surprising to find that no original research papers on neurological causation have been published from a UK source since 2003. Without support, encouragement and funding, we are not going to find the underlying cause of this illness and develop successful forms of treatment.

For these reasons we hope that the Parliamentary Inquiry will conclude that ME must now be:

• RECOGNISED AS A SERIOUS NEUROLOGICAL ILLNESS

• RESEARCHED AS A SERIOUS NEUROLOGICAL ILNESS

• MANAGED AS A SERIOUS NEUROLOGICAL ILLNESS

KEY REFERENCES

Badawy AA-B, et al (2005) Heterogeneity of serum tryptophan concentration and availability to the brain in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychopharmacology 19: 385 – 91

Chaudhuri A and Behan PO (2004) Fatigue in neurological disorders. Lancet 363: 978 – 88

Cook DB, et al (2001) Relationship of brain MRI abnormalities and physical functional status in chronic fatigue syndrome. International Journal of Neuroscience 107: 1 - 6

Costa DC, et al (1995) Brainstem perfusion is impaired in chronic fatigue syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Medicine 88: 767 – 73

de Lange FP, et al (2005) Gray matter volume reduction in chronic fatigue syndrome. NeuroImage 26: 777- 81

Freeman R (2002) The chronic fatigue syndrome is a disease of the autonomic nervous system. Sometimes. Clinical Autonomic Research 12: 231 - 3

Georgiades E, et al (2001) Chronic fatigue syndrome: new evidence for a central fatigue disorder. Clinical Science 105: 213 – 8

Heesen C, et al (2006) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: an example of cytokine mediated sickness behaviour? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 77: 34 - 9

Keenan PA (1999) Brain MRI abnormalities exist in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Neurological Sciences 172: 1 – 2

Kuratsune H, et al (2002) Brain regions involved in fatigue sensation: reduced acetylcarnitine uptake into the brain. NeuroImage 17: 1256 – 65

Natelson BH, et al (2005) Spinal fluid abnormalities in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 12: 52 – 5

Okada T, et al (2004) Mechanisms underlying fatigue: A voxel-based morphometric study of chronic fatigue syndrome. BMC neurology 4: 14

Papanicolaou DA, et al (2004) Neuroendocrine aspects of chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuroimmunomodulation 11: 65 - 74

Puri BK, et al (2002) Relative increase in choline in the occipital cortex in chronic fatigue syndrome. Acta Psychiatr Scand 106: 224 – 6

Yoshiuchi K, et al (2006) Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have reduced absolute cortical blood flow. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 26: 83 – 6

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Trish Taylor, Chair of Trustees, Action for ME

This is a summary of Action for ME's presentation

Introduction

• Thank you for inviting Action for M.E. to address the scientific group. We believe that this enquiry is a positive step in moving the M.E. Research Debate forward and appreciate the time and commitment given by the members of the group.
• In December 2005 Action for M.E. submitted written evidence to the enquiry which the panel will have had the opportunity to consider. Therefore, today, I would like to draw your attention to a few key points from the submission and some recent developments.
• The evidence presented here today and in the written submission is collected from our members and on-line surveys between 2000 and March 2006.

Key points

• Action for M.E believes that M.E. is a complex physical illness, which is still poorly understood by the medical profession.
• Patient’s experiences are not always reflected in treatment policy and practice and there is little or no choice of treatments. The AfME survey 2006 of over 2000 members indicated that 92% were made worse by physical activity yet GET remains the main source of evidence-based treatment.
• Lack of research into biological aspects hinders the development of any other treatments or potential cure. Tony Blair this morning spoke of further patient involvement and a patient-led NHS. How does this apply to a person with M.E. when their views are not being listening to and they have no real choice of treatments?
• In the four years since the publication of the Working Group’s Report to the CMO there has been some progress and demonstrable commitment by the Government to move things forward :

2002: Recognition by government of CFS/ME
2003: Publication of a national research strategy by the MRC
2003: The WHO UK Guide gave a unified neurological code to M.E./CFS
2003: The MRC workshop exploring potential for epidemiological research
2004: Ring fenced government funding (in England) of £8.5m for the NHS to establish regional centres and local teams
2004: Announcement of a referral to the NICE

• Yet, progress has been uneven, with England ahead of the rest of the UK in developing services, and throughout the UK there is a 50-year backlog of need and patchy provision.
• The recommendations of the CMO Working Group on research have not been acted on. Publication of the CMO was a very optimistic time but the following years have led to a growing frustration and a belief that PWME have been let down.
• Whilst the MRC’s research strategy confirmed the urgency of research into almost all aspects of the illness, there has been no progress in funding biological studies or epidemiological research with the effect of preserving the status quo.
• There has not been a sufficient level of investment and active encouragement to really address the need for biological research and build the capacity for a broader range of research. New scientists need to be encouraged into the field.
• The lack of biological research into treatments or a potential cure has meant that the dominant ‘evidence- based’ practices such as CBT or GET continue and a ‘one size fits all’ approach which we know doesn’t work for all people could potentially spill over into the benefits or occupational health agenda.
• In the absence of strategic action by government to implement its own recommendations the patient organisations have been pushing for progress and leading a number of initiatives. We welcome the work by our colleagues, in this but this is not enough and these have not impacted on diagnosis and treatment within the NHS. There is a need is there for much larger biological studies and a coherent research strategy.
• Both the scale of need in the impact on individuals and the cost to the nation is huge – assessed at £6.4 billion a year, but the most important is the impact on peoples lives.

The Impact on People’s Lives

• People living with M.E. experience a long term physical disabling illness.
• The impact of M.E. on their lives is poorly understood by many health and social care professionals, as well as the general public.
• This puts them at greater risk of social isolation and exclusion from adequate health and social care, work and leisure opportunities, potentially leading to socio-economic deprivation and an increase in the impact the disease has on their lives.

Action for M.E.’s Campaign ‘More Than You Know ‘ to be launched in May 2006 will illustrate-

• 75% of people who get M.E. lose their jobs because of the illness.
• 25% of people with M.E. are housebound or bed-bound because of the illness and need to use a wheelchair.
• 92% of people with M.E. said that their fatigue is worsened by physical activity.
• 77% suffered social isolation as a result of M.E.
• The most common trigger for M.E. was believed to be an infection (75%),
• 77% of sufferers said that their level of social contact has decreased a lot since they got M.E., and this figure was as high as 94% when their M.E. was at its worst.
• And until new scientists are brought into the field and a robust research strategy is developed the ways of addressing this injustice are stalled.

Action for M.E.’s Role in Research

• Campaigning for research into the treatment and causes of M.E. not primarily a research charity.
• Catalyst to stimulate the research agenda and broaden the field
• Acting as Critical friend / to the MRC Government etc
• Collaborative working in Research Projects such as PRIME / MRC
• Representing member views and experience in research projects or to the MRC. For example, in the 2002 survey 89% of our members wanted research into immunology with 87% requesting neurology.

Future Developments

• AfME to participate in M.E. Observatory (summary attached)
• Research Summit- joint with MRC in the Autumn to attract a broad range of researchers from diverse backgrounds with the intent of sparking biological studies.
• Ensuring that the NHS Services influence the Research Agenda- (potentially 21,000 people are seen annually with opportunity to use their experience to establish minimal data set of clinical audit and patient outcomes leading towards new research questions for quality research proposals.

Conclusions

• We can demonstrate overwhelming need for increased biomedical funding
• There are massive social and health injustice and inequalities
• Collaboration, between Government, funders of research and patients to move forward to get research off the ground.

Trish Taylor
18th April 2006

Summary of National M.E Observatory

Action for ME (AfME) is to initiate a CFS/ME Observatory which will include a disease register, and which will produce and facilitate epidemiological and social research responding to the needs of the CFS/ME community.

Initially, the Observatory includes AfME, the University of East Anglia (UEA), the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and the Hull-York Medical School. It is envisaged that in the future the Observatory will expand to include other representatives of the CFS/ME community and other universities, independent researchers and stakeholders.

Within the scope of the present 3 year plan the Observatory will pilot a disease register of confirmed cases of CFS/ME (Study I) and conduct a further five inter-related studies in the areas of epidemiology and social research.

These studies will aim to:

• estimate the occurrence and distribution of CFS/ME in three regions of the UK and identify social inequalities in the occurrence of the disease (Study II);
• investigate social inequalities in quality of life of adults with CFS/ME and their carers (Study III);
• assess the impact of CFS/ME on the experience of people living with this disease from different social backgrounds, focusing on the persons’ ability to have his/her experience acknowledged and influence the provision of care (Study IV);
• describe - in the perspective of health and social professionals – client and professional attitudes that enable the client to establish the legitimacy of living with CFS/ME and to influence care (Study V);
• review systematically the support for social inclusion of people in England living with CFS/ME (Study VI).

By involving the CFS/ME community in the research process and disseminating the findings to a broad audience, we aim to empower the CFS/ME community to influence the general public, professionals and policy makers, so leading to policy and practice which is responsive to their needs.

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Sue Sherlock and Sheila McGovern, Trustees, MEACH Trust

REQUESTED

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Jane Colby, Executive Director, The Young Me Sufferers Trust (TYMES TRUST)

Introduction

I am here both as Executive Director of The Young ME Sufferers Trust, but also on my own behalf as a former severe ME sufferer.

The Trust has just funded, with MERGE and a contribution from Search ME, the first biomedical research in children at Ninewells Hospital at the University of Dundee, looking at whether previous findings of abnormalities in the blood vessels of adults with ME/CFS are also present in children. We are a purely voluntary charity; everyone at the Trust gives their time free of charge.

We have very specific recommendations to make regarding research into ME.

Presentation

In 1985, I was Head Teacher of an Essex school when I developed ME from a Coxsackie B viral infection, one of the enterovirus family and a relation of poliomyelitis.

The day it began is etched in my memory. The late Housing Minister, Ian Gow, was due to arrive for a luncheon at the school; I was waiting for him with the welcome party when I was suddenly struck by terrible pains in my back. I
thought I was getting 'flu, but it wasn't the 'flu.

Do not let anyone tell you that this is like having 'ordinary' flu. I have never been so ill in my life. I thought I was dying. I was in terrible pain, could not walk, could not think or talk properly, lost much of my vocabulary, and I could not look after myself, nor even chew food without taking a rest during each mouthful. For years, I was bedridden and then in a wheelchair, relapsing each time I started to improve and tried to get back
to work. This was a chronic and very severe illness. Eventually I left my profession in order to try and regain my health.

During my years of illness I was asked by a consultant microbiologist to help support children with ME, and thus I realised what was happening to children with ME.

In 1996 my first book 'ME - The New Plague' was published, tracing the link between ME and polio. It included much about children and young people with ME and is the source of many of the ME statistics still in widespread use today. This book is in the House of Commons Library and the House of Lords Library. By coincidence, that year another book was published with a similar title - 'A Summer Plague' - describing what polio did to children.

ME is a parallel with polio. With the aid of historical documents and accounts of epidemics of polio and ME, my book demonstrated how ME has taken over as vaccination against polio eliminated competitor viruses to those
that are known to be implicated in ME.

In 1997, my five year study of the pattern of ME in UK schools, carried out with Dr Elizabeth Dowsett, was published in the Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. This is the biggest study ever carried out into ME. We studied a school roll of 333,024 children and 27,327 staff. We discovered that ME is the biggest cause of Long Term Sickness Absence in schools, in staff as well as pupils, something since confirmed by other smaller studies. Indeed, around 90% of enquiries to the Trust's Advice Line have concerned relapses and other difficulties caused by educational demands.

Not only did we show that ME is disabling and chronic in children, but the disease also showed an infectious pattern - a clustering pattern. Both I, and the Trust, believe that children are the epicentre of this illness. We
are confirmed in this view both by evidence and by a consultant microbiologist. There were then, and continue to be now, mini-epidemics in many schools.

In 2005, JKS Chia reviewed the evidence on enteroviruses. After explaining the coining of the term Chronic Fatigue Syndrome two and a half decades ago, he states:

'Initial reports of chronic enteroviral infections causing debilitating symptoms in patients with CFS were met with scepticism, and had been largely forgotten for the past decade. Observations from in vitro experiments and
from animal models [have] clearly established a state of chronic persistence through the formation of double stranded RNA, similar to findings reported in muscle biopsies of patients with CFS. Recent evidence [has] not only
confirmed the earlier studies, but also clarified the pathogenic role of viral RNA through antiviral treatment.'

Dr Chia's review summarises the available experimental and clinical evidence that supports the role of enterovirus - the virus family that includes the polioviruses.

He quotes tests demonstrating that antibody concentrations against enteroviruses in patients with CFS were still raised more than 48months - two years - after initially showing such raised antibody concentrations. Pointing out methodological flaws with studies that once threw doubt on the enteroviral connection, he concludes:

'Thus, renewed interest is needed to study further the role of enterovirus as the causative agent of CFS. [.] A well designed, randomised, controlledtrial of antiviral treatment will ultimately provide crucial information on the pathogenic role of enterovirus in patients with CFS and other chronic diseases.'

We are presenting the Group with a marked up copy of Dr Chia's Review and a copy of the evidence we gave to the Parliamentary Select Committee on Special Educational Needs, as we believe that this may be relevant to your
work.

The Trust's Recommendations

* That an enteroviral study be set up as suggested by JKS chia in his review The role of enterovirus in chronic fatigue syndrome, J.Clin. Pathol. 2005;58;1126-1132

* That ME/CFS be made notifiable in schools - staff as well as pupils - in order to demonstrate the pattern in schools; there are mini-epidemics and clusters.

* That all previous work on ME epidemics over the decades, eg during the whole of the twentieth century, be revisited; it has been sidelined in the adoption of the unsatisfactory name Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

* That there be further study of cognitive impairments caused by ME/CFS

* That the Group should appoint, in some capacity, an experienced microbiologist to assist it in its work.

Jane Colby
Executive Director
The Young ME Sufferers Trust
PO Box 4347
Stock Ingatestone
Essex CM4 9TE
Tel 01245 401080
www.tymestrust.org

END OF STATEMENT

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Greg Crowhurst, The 25% ME Group (for people severely affected by ME)

Introduction

Good afternoon. Winston Churchill is quoted as saying that it takes courage to stand up and speak …. and it also takes courage to sit down and listen. No PowerPoint here, just a passionate, even daring, attempt to covey to you the horror that is severe ME and a cry from the heart, on behalf of the 800 severely ill members of the 25% Severe ME Group , to do something about it.

I am a Roman Catholic, this Good Friday I didn’t go to mass, why, because I was busy holding my wife, trying, without success, to ease, just for a moment, the shooting, burning stabbing pain and mass of other symptoms she suffers. That is my declared interest; I have been caring for my wife who has severe ME for twelve years .

We spoke about courage just now; it takes an inordinate amount of courage to live with severe ME – that illness that is so poorly understood, according to the Chief Medical Officer, that illness that at present is specifically excluded from UK research, that illness that is devastating beyond comprehension : some of our members have been desperately ill for as long as 40 years. I am very disturbed then by one of the questions this enquiry, according to the letter I have here from Ian Woodcroft, wants us to answer: “What do you believe ME to be ?” Gosh if there is any one symptom of the tangled mess we are in, it is that one question.

There is NO debate about what ME is ! Since 1969, the year I started high school, ME has been recognised as a WHO –classified , serious neurological illness, 30% of cases are progressive and degenerative and it can be fatal. ME is endemic in the UK with epidemic and pandemic potential and ranks second only to AIDS in terms of its impact on the population; indeed the quality of life of a severe ME sufferer has been compared to that of an AIDS sufferer two months before death. Only in terminally ill cancer patients is the sickness impact profile greater. 37 years later we do NOT need to be debating WHAT the illness is !!

Yet still not a single penny is being spent on physical research.

In a moment I will show you a short video clip; I defy anyone to watch the sheer naked pain , the relentless grind of the illness portrayed here (holding up the DVD), and still conclude , for the first time in medical history, that the physical causes of an illness should not be investigated, as the UK psychiatric lobby insist.

ME is a hidden illness in more ways than one. If only we could physically see the pain : (Putting on a red paper mask and dark sunglasses, with symptoms of paralysis, numbness, pain, pins and needles etc. written all over it) This is how my wife describes the symptoms she experiences, and (touching the mask) this is how she describes the feel of her skin, stiff, sore, “ouch” – ultra-sensitive to touch, unable to bear it. And it is not just her face it is her whole body.

(Displaying a pack of the 30 symptom cards , from the Report) 64 distinct physical symptoms have been documented in ME. For the purposes of this study we focused on only 31. Out of those 31, respondents are suffering on average 20 of these symptoms each : (throwing out the cards). (Picking up a few at random) Imagine if you were suffering from just one of these symptoms : eg PAIN, – imagine if you can, suffering from just three. You or I could not possibly imagine what life would be like if we suffered from 20 or more symptoms..

Kipling once said that “Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind.” How true ! The reason the question: “What do you think ME is?” is even being raised today is because the pharmaceutical lobby, the medical insurance lobby and blatantly obeying their paymasters, the psychiatric lobby have high jacked the WHO neurological illness “ME “ and attempted to turn it into a psychiatric condition, especially by changing its name, by attempting to label the illness as a “Fatigue condition”. Do you see these symptoms ? Do you have any idea how stupid a word “fatigue” is to use to describe the pain-wrecked, global disablement, all-over paralysis that is
ME ? Please, we spoke about courage, please see the scandal that is being perpetuated here – how the waters have been (successfully ) hopelessly muddied !

While the multimillion psychiatric industry goes from strength to strength, on the backs of ME , sufferers themselves are being wronged. The respondents in this study ALL say that the greatest bane of their life are the immensely powerful, ultra slick, extremely damaging psychiatric lobby.. You know what the best people with severe ME can hope for at the moment ? It is to being diagnosed, and then be left alone. People are terrified of being forced into the discredited current psychiatric treatment regimes that will only make them much worse and this report is full of examples of people who have been left bed bound for years on end as a result of dangerous, to ME sufferers, Graded Exercise and CBT regimes. We in the ME community know exactly what is happening and why. While no money is being spent on physical research millions of pounds are being poured into psychiatric research based on a tissue of lies : (Produce the tissue box and extract one at a time the “tissues”- and refuting very briefly each lie)

ME/CFS is a somatoform disorder

ME/CFS is “cured” by Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Graded Exercise (GET).

‘Fatigue' or 'tiredness' is the one essential characteristic of ME/CFS

ME/CFS is depression

ME derives from deconditioning

(Throwing down the symptom cards onto the tissue of lies) Once you believe that ME is debatable , it can be grossly manipulated, as we see here. There are over 2000 published papers, mostly ignored by the UK psychiatric lobby and medical establishment, proving that ME is a serious physical illness of the central nervous and cellular-metabolic systems.

On behalf of the 25% Group members , many of whom make a personal appeal to you today in this report (show them) , I implore you to at least find out the who, what, where, when – and possibly even the why of severe ME, through calling for immediate epidemiological research, for neither the CMO report nor the accompanying York Review and indeed the forthcoming NICE Review, to my knowledge, include studies on those who bed or wheelchair bound. Because there are none - and sufferers are being left, incredibly, for weeks, months, years, decades, just to get on with it, with no help, no treatment whatsoever, and as this report shows being labelled as psychiatric patients, being treated with contempt by GP’s, doctors and nurses, being locked in secure units and shut in AIDS wards, being refused food and being made to participate in inappropriate graded exercise and behavioural therapy, designed to convince them there is nothing wrong with them.

Confucius said that to know something is wrong and not to do something about it; that is the worse form of cowardice. I leave you with that thought.

Greg Crowhurst

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Colin Parratt, Trustee, Case History for Research on ME (CHROME)

Introduction

Over the last ten years we have collected a unique body of information on the progress of what has been called ‘the disease of 1,000 names’. Our data now constitutes, as far as we know the largest longitudinal study in the world.

First, a brief explanation of our beginnings

Origins and methodology

By the end of 1993 Dr Christine Richards, a former university lecturer and researcher, was almost completely bedbound, having had a diagnosis of ME in 1986. She realised that she belonged to an invisible group of patients and therefore decided to attempt to characterise and quantify the problem at a national level.

While the initial list of volunteer participants was being compiled a draft of the initial questionnaire was sent to experts in various fields. In addition criteria from the OPCS report, The Prevalence of Disability among Adults (1988), were used as a basis for the section on disability.

Accepting participants

Since the beginning there has been a steady stream of requests to participate and the criteria, checked in a brief telephone assessment carried out by Colin Parratt are in this handout:
(hand outs)

Questionnaires are sent out annually to all participants. You will find them here ( hand outs)

The patient View

We are at present looking with PRIME at the possibilities of putting much of the data we have on the PRIME website because we believe that a more holistic study of the illness could move research forward. We will therefore attempt to show glimpses of the patient view of the illness that emerges from our data
------------------------------------------
In 1995 a participant considers the beginning

If you get a good start in ME you are bloody lucky!
If your GP is good it makes huge difference

I take neostigmine on occasion (small doses)
Have had IGG - no results for breathing swallowing general weakness
It sometimes helps but sometimes makes it worse
Magnesium jabs helped a bit 034

--------------------------------------


In 2002 one participant described the distressing effects of loss of communicaton

… speech loss or loss of the ability to communicate in any way, is by far the worst aspect of severe ME, producing helplessness, powerlessness, isolation, desperation, distress, increased anxiety, loss of self-identity, loss of human contact, destruction of relationships with loved ones. 004

-------------------------------------------

As late as 1999 problems were experienced in hospitals

In April 1998 I spent 8 weeks in X Hospital at R. There is no proper care or understanding in there and along with the other 5 patients on my ward I came out worse. I became very weak in there. I was tube fed again, I weighed less than 7 stone due to a severe gastro bug that went undealt with and all my symptoms increased massively. I am now back to where I was before but it has taken over a year to recover. 009

-------------------------------


One of the initial respondents in 1994 described how she managed the illness:

It wasn’t really until after a severe relapse in Dec 1988 that I learned to manage the illness well, before that I would get very frustrated sometimes and do too much even though I knew I would pay a price. 26

And two years later,

… palpitations, came back with a vengeance. By “palpitations” I mean awareness of strong heartbeat and/or a fast internal “quivering “ or juddering sensation (like an electric current continuously reverberating through my body) which I felt in the chest, stomach, legs, even in my head. 26
----------------------------------

Also in 1994 another respondent let us know what we had left out, recorded the condition spreading through a family and considered causes:

You don’t really cover my worst symptom which is brain fatigue, so severe I can only talk for a few minutes at a time, and often only whisper.

Most of the alternative therapies have made me worse, at least temporarily, by giving me extreme blood sugar ions and stopping my periods. I did once, on the advice of the therapist, try to push through these symptoms and became very ill.
My symptoms have worsened steadily since we moved to this house in 1991. Last year my 12-ear-old son developed ME and this summer my husband got it. We are trying to move house!
We are assuming that geopathic stress is a big problem for us, as we form a cluster all on our own, we also wonder about organophospate poisoning as when I got ill, we lived between 2 farms which sprayed. 29

------------------------------

In 2005 a participant described the “fatigue” element

The first sign of the ME is an onset of tiredness – not a normal “I’m ready for bed” tiredness, but an overpowering fatigue. At this point, if I do not stop and rest completely for the reminder of the day (and take it easy for the next day), all my muscles will start to ache and any movement will be a tremendous effort and painful as if my body were made of lead. It will take me about a week to recover from this – rest followed by gradual introduction of energy use (as I was taught in the X Hospital).
If I had to work for a living, it would be a different story. 31

------------------------------------

Another respondent in 1998 recommended a holistic approach:

– I cannot stress enough how important an holistic approach to the illness has been for me. The treatment that has helped me the most throughout my illness has been acupuncture, this has provided medical, emotional and practical management of the illness. With the use of Chinese herbs, acupuncture and herbal food supplements I have experienced relief of many of my symptoms and improvement in my condition. Examples of areas in which this has helped are – thick heads, weak digestion, strengthening muscles, treatment of colds, sleeping disorders, heart racing and calming of emotions.
I learnt followed the Cognitive Behaviour Therapy regime strictly for a year and my condition see-sawed, but over all deteriorated.
384
-------------------------------------------------


Many participants told stories of the unhelpful treatment they had received in hospitals or other care centres

They knew little about ME and I had to work hard to get the right treatment, but they were eager to learn. I have since learned that two people at the centre thought I should be sectioned when I relapsed and refused to go in (because I knew it would make my illness worse to go). 019

----------------------------------

Where do we go from here?

We have recorded responses from over 300 people, some of them having completed as many as 10 annual questionnaires. The above extracts are an attempt to give you a picture of the great variability of the effects of their illness – in all cases diagnosed as ME/CFS/PVFS. The greater part of the questionnaire records the severity of a very large number of symptoms and disabilities. These records we believe may well hold the key to and understanding of the causes and effective treatments of this most debilitating and long lasting condition. We recommend that researchers make CHROME’s unique database a serious subject for study when it is finally made accessible on the PRIME website.

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Ray Briggs, Fund for Osteopathic Research into ME

Summary only

Mr Briggs spoke about how he has recovered his health following a course of treatment with Dr Raymond Perrin.

Eight years on, he still remains in good health in full time employment as a banker and a busy family man who also enjoys a round of golf at the weekends.

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Dr Raymond Perrin, Osteopathic Practitioner, Founder of The Perrin Clinics

Since a fateful day in 1989 when I first successfully treated CFS/ME in a patient with postural problems I have been on a mission to find out why I was able to help this complex disorder by simple manual techniques.

After 17 years of clinical research including 2 controlled trials at the Universities of Salford and Manchester, my co-workers and I have scientifically demonstrated that my treatment methods did indeed help with symptoms associated with CFS/ME and proposed a rational hypothesis to explain why my techniques help. Most significantly we found no structural abnormalities or pathological changes in the brain or muscles of the CFS/ME patients compared with matched healthy controls.

To understand how to treat CFS/ME One has to examine the probable mechanism causing the disease in the first place.

1. The central nervous system has no true lymphatic drainage . However a function of the cerebrospinal fluid that is not well documented is the drainage of toxins into the lymphatic system at both cranial and spinal outlets. This extra drainage system supplements the normal drainage of csf via venous return. And we suggest that it is this system that is the common disturbance that links all CFS/ME sufferers

2. There are also several chemical sensitive regions bordering the brain’s ventricular system, which interact with toxins sending messages to the hypothalamus. Also, one of the most permeable regions of the blood brain barrier is at the hypothalamus facilitating its ability to the monitor hormone levels in blood. This increased permeability also makes the hypothalamus the most prone region in the brain to suffer a toxic insult.

A. The hypothalamus controls the sympathetic nervous system which becomes dysfunctional in CFS/ME and we now know that the sympathetic nervous system controls a pump within smooth muscle walls of the central lymphatic ducts as well as blood vessels. In CFS/ME a backflow of lymph thro the reversal of the normal pump causes further toxic insult to the surrounding tissues including the brain and spinal cord.

B. At the same time and often many years prior to the onset, different stress factors some physical, or environmental ,hormonal, allergic, emotional or via bacterial or viral infections lead to an overstrain of the sympathetic nervous system

The ensuing neurological overload has at last been identified by other experts as integral part of CFS/ME as seen in the recent Canadian Criteria.

The final insult is only part of a much larger aetiological picture often dating back years. Thus CFS/ME in many cases is actually a pre-viral condition with a possible virus being the last straw.

My approach stimulates the fluid motion around the brain and spinal cord via gentle cranial techniques . Articulation of the spine further aids drainage of these toxins out of the cerebrospinal fluid. Specific massage techniques of the soft tissues direct the toxins out of the lymphatic system and into the blood, towards the liver where they are readily detoxified.

Eventually with less poisons affecting the hypothalamus, the sympathetic nervous system and the lymphatics begins to function correctly, and providing the patients do not overstrain themselves their symptoms should steadily improve.

CFS/ME is thus very much a functional biomechanical disorder with definite diagnosable physical signs including disturbed spinal posture, swollen lymph vessels palpable and occasionally visible and specific tender points related to sympathetic nerve disturbance and backflow of lymphatic fluid. The fluid drainage from the brain to the lymphatics moves in a rhythm that can be palpated using cranial techniques and a trained practitioner can feel a disturbance, usually a sluggishness, of the cranial rhythm in CFS/ME.

(photos shown to the committee showed visible proof of actual surface lymphatic varicosities in a CFS/ME patient, the bottom photo is clearer and the absence of any blue/purplish hue confirms these as lymph and not blood vessels).

OTHER SIGNS: include marked abnormal striae (stretch marks) in the breasts, waist and thighs of patient due to collagen damage in the surface lymphatics, severe acne and skin eruptions due to toxins eg candida patches/rashes, Evidence of injury to head eg scars, and pupil dilation or constriction.

MORE RESEARCH

Multicenter studies using a much larger cohort of patients are most definitely required in the future to further validate my hypothesis.

From the biomechanical approach I have recently been offered the post of honorary research fellow at the Allied Health Department in the University of Central Lancashire, Professor Jim Richard,s who is head of research at the department wishes to further explore the physical aspect of CFS/ME.

However my treatment alone is often not enough in many cases.

I believe due to the multifactorial nature of this disease, with every patient presenting with different symptoms, the solution lies in finding out which treatments work best and establishing a large comparative and collaborative study. A combined approach with other clinical researchers will ultimately prove to be in the patient’s interest in finding the best treatment protocol and Prof. Richards and his team at UCLAN are interested in joining any research study that is proposed.

Another area of exploration arising from my thesis that requires further investigation is the examination of the drainage rate of CSF into the lymphatics. Agreement has been reached for a future study to be undertaken at the University of Manchester’s department of Fluid Mechanics and Aeronautical engineering. Researchers, using and computerised models of the bio-mechanical influences affecting the lymphatic drainage of the brain are to calculate a possible range of normal values of this drainage.

I believe future studies should also focus on Functional and pharmacological MRI which can be used to determine pathophysiological dysfunction in the central nervous system.

As in all areas of medicine, genetic research has a major role to play in improving our future understanding of aetiological mechanisms that may pre-dispose patients with CFS/ME.

Finally If we in this room can all work together, I believe that the future of hundreds of thousands of sufferers in the UK will be much rosier. Thank you.

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Mary-Jane Willows, Chief Executive, Association of Young People with ME (AYME)

What do you believe ME to be?

Perhaps at this time the most widely held beliefs are that ME is the abnormal reaction of the body to a viral illness. What the process is and why it affects us in the way it does can only be speculation at this time.
Current research and thinking leads us to consider that there could be:
• a genetic link or predisposition
• a dysfunction of the Hypothalamus
However what we do know is that ME is a complex illness with, perhaps various triggers, and certainly a variation with symptoms and levels of severity. It affects many body systems and has no home in any medical specialism, frequently described as an “orphan illness”. There is no established and uniform definition.

Public understanding of the levels of severity of the illness and the social impact of ME on children and young people is still poor, to say the least.

We do know that ME is that it is a devastating illness, with high level morbidity. All of this leaves an estimated 25,000 children and young people struggling alone to cope, often without medical support.

AYME’s 2003 members’ survey revealed that 41% had not seen a medical specialist in the last three years and of those who had an appointment, only 4% had seen an ME specialist .

It is widely accepted to be the main cause for long-term school absence in secondary schools. Many children of compulsory school age experience discrimination due to lack of awareness and understanding of the potential severity of the condition, resulting in a lack of suitable provision.

What support ME patients have in their illness?

Since the announcement of the government pump priming 8.5 million pounds into services for ME in England. AYME has worked tirelessly to try to ensure they reflected and respected the needs and wishes of children and young people.

Whilst acknowledging much has been done with 11 local multidisciplinary teams now offering services, that still leaves the majority of children and young people in the UK struggling to cope with this chronic, debilitating condition.

Apart from a minority who are lucky enough to receive domiciliary care, those who are severely affected are all too often left isolated and ignored by the medical profession.

Where there are services, they don’t always offer choice. The treatment does not always reflect the needs and wishes of the families. The multi-disciplinary approach is not everyone’s choice and this does need serious consideration. Some families are looking for support whilst they allow the condition to follow its own path but need an understanding paediatrician or GP to offer guidance and support in coping with pain and symptom management.

Until there is sound scientific evidence about the efficacy of available treatments, patients must be given choice. Pacing, Graded Activity and CBT are available for those who wish to take it up. However what is vital is that it must be delivered by professionals who have been trained in the specific needs of these young people; otherwise the consequences are seen to be disastrous.

Where these are offered by trained and experienced staff we are seeing some very promising results. One of the new services, in Bath, has already seen over 500 children and young people with very positive and promising outcomes. Teams like this need to be funded to provide training across the UK; in Wales and Northern Ireland, services are dramatically behind those in England in their recognising and treating the condition. In the vast “black holes” which still exist in England, GP’s with special interest need to be identified and offered training, so they can share their expertise with colleagues.

There are still wide gaps in the services available. Education for all GP’s, practice nurses, community paediatricians and district nurses provided by those with knowledge and expertise in managing the condition would reduce the pressure on patients and their families.

AYME acknowledges things have progressed in the last two years but is aware that funding for the few services we have is now under threat as the money given to the PCT’s was not ring fenced beyond April 2006. This would be devastating to all those patients still on waiting lists and a scandalous waste of the money already spent on training and setting up the services.

Education is a real source of pressure for these young people. Parents are still being threatened with Child Protection proceedings if they don’t drag their children into school. I know one mother who is forced to drive her son to school knowing as soon as she arrives home she will receive a call to pick him up! Until the GP’s and paediatricians have the knowledge and expertise to support these families this behaviour will continue and we will keep hearing stories like this.

What future scientific research needs to be undertaken in the ME field?

Children and young people are a significant group within the UK ME population; they are usually omitted from research studies.

There is currently little information about the similarities and or differences between the condition in adults and children. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Guidelines state:
“CFS/ME presents with a wide range of symptoms; just as individual children and young people may not have the same package of symptoms so they may also not react in the same way to the recommended interventions”. There is real risk in extrapolating results from adult research when looking at ME in children. It is vital that research is carried out on this patient group. What is urgently needed is:

• A validated Definition
This will allow access to medical care with clear criteria for diagnosis

• Epidemiology
A study of the population in this country especially for the under 10’s as the number of children is increasing and to show how the condition presents across all social and ethnic classes.

• Genetics
A large case control study is needed, to look at genetic makeup across all social and ethnic classes.
This would allow paediatricians to provide informed education for patients on management of their illness and give them a clearer picture of prognosis.

AYME would refer you to the detail of Research Priorities clearly set out in the RCPCH Guidelines. This document was given detailed consideration in consultation with patients, their families and carers.

ME is a major issue and it is clear that the level of the problem is not being understood or acknowledged. It is currently impossible to get funding for large scale studies. One consultant leading the field in work with children and young people was told “until the basic work is done we can’t fund major research projects” however gaining funding for this basic work has proved impossible for her as well. She knows in other fields her work would have attracted funding, without issue.

Now couldn’t be a better time. With the new Department of Health services we have the infrastructure in place. This year is the perfect time and we have people desperate to undertake this work to improve the lives of these children and young people.

We thank the Group on Scientific Research into ME for taking this opportunity of including children and young people in its enquiry.

Mary-Jane Willows
CEO AYME
On behalf of members of the Association of Young People with ME
18 April 2006

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Dr Angela Kennedy and Jane Bryant, The One Click Group

The One Click Group have copyrighted their presentation to the Gibson Inquiry.

To read it, please visit their website at One Click website

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Jill Pigott, Co-ordinator, and Rosemary Winnall, Member, Worcestershire ME SUpport Group

My name is Rosemary Winnall. I am carer for my daughter Nikki who has severe M.E., and I am a member of the Worcestershire M.E. Support Group.

I am with Jill Pigott who is carer for her son Mark aged 34 who was diagnosed with M.E. in 1998. So we both live with M.E. on a daily basis and have personal experience on its effects on people’s lives. Jill is the Co-ordinator for the Worcestershire ME Support group, and represents the group on the M.E./CFS Herefordshire & Worcestershire Local Multi-Disciplinary Team Steering Group.

How M.E. effects the lives of sufferers

Whatever age, or stage of life, people with M.E. are effected in every way possible.

With children it interrupts education and make it difficult to grow up socially. They haven’t the energy to mix with their friends, so become isolated. Adults too can become socially isolated.

The list of symptoms experienced by people with M.E. is very long, fatigue being just one of them. One of the most difficult things to deal with is the fluctuations as people with M.E. can change from minute to minute, day to day. This makes it extremely difficult to keep to any plans. By pacing and keeping to a routine, life can become possible, but if they just do a little extra, either physically or mentally, a relapse occurs. People with M.E. have to learn to cope with the symptoms and this is why they try so many complementary therapies and supplements.
Three quarters of people with M.E. have cognitive disturbance, including problems with short term memory loss, and difficulty concentrating. For many people with M.E. this makes it very difficult to carry out anything that requires mental effort, such as shopping, cooking, driving, studying, reading a book. Even watching television takes up too much energy.

Some people with M.E. are able to do some work, but more often than not it is part time. But this is only if they have support from their family, and the employment is suitable for the sufferer.

What you believe M.E. to be

M.E. is an organic illness with many symptoms, involving the brain as well as disruption to the hormone and immune systems. We believe ME causes histological, electrophysiological and immunological abnormalities following a viral infection.

What help and support M.E. sufferers have in tackling their illness

A couple of years ago our Group asked what members found helpful and what had been unhelpful. The replies showed how much money and time is used going from one complementary therapy to another trying to find something that will relieve some of their many symptoms. They also try various supplements without knowing which would be of benefit to them. All this is costing people hundreds of pounds, and yet the majority are living on a very reduced income, or benefits.

Dr Mark Roberts is our new Consultant in Infectious Disease with an interest in CFS/ME. Dr Mark Roberts joined the Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust in October 2005, and has an M.E./CFS clinic at Kidderminster Hospital. He also has a monthly clinic at Hereford Hospital.

In April 2005 the Herefordshire and Worcestershire M.E./CFS Local Multi-Disciplinary Team (LMDT) received £120,000 to enhance the service in the two counties. This covers the four Primary Care Trusts in Herefordshire and Worcestershire. The combined area covers approximately 1300 square miles, and serves a population
of about 730,000. It is estimated that likely prevalence of ME sufferers is between 2,000 and 2,500. It is felt that we need to have a register of patients. The local services will then being able to plan their services, and the various government departments will realise how much help is needed.

The original plan was for the LMDT to have two full time occupational therapists, and also 2 part time dieticians, 2 part time psychologists, and 2 part time physiotherapists, all part time posts being one day a week. The planning stage has been very slow, but eventually in November we had a few people in place with the service being gradually set-up and the new therapists learning about M.E. We now understand that most of the nutrition, psychology and physio advice will be given via group sessions, in fact one of the Worcestershire members was last month referred to a Weight Management Group session quite irrelevant to the help required for her condition.

We were told that an advert was being placed for another OT last November, but this did not take place due to a NHS headcount reduction. Peter Luff MP took this up with the South Worcestershire PCT and was told that the Strategic Health Authority required all organisations to effect a headcount reduction between September 2005 and March 2006. We were promised that this would go ahead soon.

Just last week, at our Local Multi-Disciplinary Team Steering Group meeting we were told that the South Worcestershire PCT is unable to employ a new part time OT as they cannot increase their headcount. An advert was placed in March for a 20 hour a week OT, and a number of applications received - and then everything came to a halt again.

Also last week we were informed that people with Severe M.E. should ask their GP for a referral to a Community Matron who will be able to give a case management approach. But, we have been told that these Community Matrons will not have specialist skills.

People with M.E. very rarely visit their GP unless they are concerned about a new symptom. The LMDT will be seeing newly diagnosed patients - we believe all people with M.E. should receive regular check-ups with their GP.
People with M.E. in Worcestershire and Herefordshire will be able to receive a diagnosis from Dr Mark Roberts. The LMDT will then give advice on management strategies. We feel that blood tests are required to find deficiencies and these should also be carried out at the M.E. clinics. The supplements to rectify any deficiencies should then be available from their GP.

Living with Severe ME.

We probably all know someone who has mild or moderate ME, but the severe sufferer is usually unseen, alone at home, often bedbound and in great pain for years and unable easily to make their plight widely known.

My daughter is now 22. Before being diagnosed with ME 5 years ago, she was an enthusiastic mountaineer, black run skier and she had spent the previous summer working with children in a squatter camp in Cape Town South Africa. She had also walked the length of Wales across the mountains to raise money for Great Ormond Street Hospital, and she had a university education in front of her.

Her health collapsed during A levels. For most of the last two years she has been bed bound lying in a darkened room, unable to see visitors, talk on the phone, watch television or concentrate for more than a few minutes. She has severe fatigue and can only sit up in bed for a few minutes at a time. She is always in pain and usually has nausea, muscle spasms and unusual body temperature control. Last winter she had her worst relapse ever, leaving her in terrible pain that was almost unbearable to see, and she was unable to speak for some days. She became almost unconscious with the pain, had difficulty in breathing, and was at times paralyzed leaving her unable to move or help herself in any way. She thought she was going to die.

She cannot seem to tolerate medication and has developed a wide range of allergies. She has very low tolerance to noise, light, touch, movement and smell and this is why hospitalisation is only a very last resort for these severe sufferers, as any extra stress on the senses can push the body into further decline. Complete paralysis, seizures and fits are experienced by some.

We recently came very close to Nicky being tube-fed as she became unable to swallow easily and was too weak to hold a spoon. I had to try to feed her myself. Even in her better times her hands can be so painful and sensitive that sometimes we have to wrap her cutlery in cotton wool to lessen the pain.

There are many implications for carers and I have had to give up my job as a teacher to look after my daughter full time. My husband and I can take no holidays together and any excursions away from home are dependent on Nicky’s state of health and her mealtimes.

We do hope that more money can be invested into research into the cause of ME and that a cure may be found soon to improve quality of life for all sufferers. In the meantime, when plans are made to set up a service to help ME sufferers, I do hope that these severe ME patients and their families are not forgotten.

We would like all workers in this field to be better informed about Severe ME.

The sort of help currently available through occupational therapy, physiotherapy and counselling which Nikki experienced when she was mildly affected with ME, is just not relevant to a severely ill sufferer. The graded-exercise that was recommended actually resulted in further deterioration of her condition.

We would love to have a Support Worker who understood severe ME and knew how to help and encourage sufferers and carers. We would like this worker to visit us at home on a regular basis to support us in our care of our daughter, to encourage us, to give us up-to-date information about current ME thinking, research and treatments, and to advise about aids for caring. We would like a doctor or nurse to give Nikki regular physical check-ups to check that nothing else is going wrong.

What future scientific research needs to be undertaken in the M.E. field in our opinion

In our opinion the top priority is to discover a diagnosis test. This would tell the GPs, Benefit doctors, etc whether people have M.E.

There are many people under the umbrella of M.E./CFS - a diagnostic test would then lead to correct treatment for all people with M.E., and also lead to people with fatigue for other reasons being treated suitably.

Biomedical research is needed into the neurological abnormalities that are happening in people with ME.
We need to know if, and how, complementary therapies can help, particularly the value of dietary and nutritional approaches.

Our Group joined MERGE’s ‘Group Friends of MERGE’ scheme as we support their aim for a biomedical breakthrough in the investigation, diagnosis and treatment of ME/CFS. Our members continually write to their MPs asking for the Government to support biomedical research.

We are very grateful to Dr Richard Taylor, Vice Chair of the Group on Scientific Research into M.E. who met people with M.E. at a special meeting in Kidderminster last month and heard their concerns about research and the local health services.

We are appreciative of the new clinics which are vital for the newly diagnosed but there is still nothing for the long term chronic and severely ill, their future is in the research coming up with a pharmaceutical product to give them some quality of life.

The Worcestershire M.E. Support Group welcomes the Gibson Inquiry
and hopes this will bring benefit to the many ME sufferers across the country.

6/23/2006

FIRST DAY - 18 APRIL 2006 Tanya and Christine Harrison, Trustees, Blue Ribbon Action for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (BRAME)

Written Submission on Research Evidence
to
The Gibson Inquiry
by
BRAME

B R A M E
Blue Ribbon for the Awareness of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
30 Winmer Avenue, Winterton-On-Sea, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR29 4BA
Telephone/Fax: 01493 – 393717
www.brame.org brame@brame.org

17 January 2006

Dr Ian Gibson
MP for Norwich
c/o Ian Woodcroft
House of Commons
Westminster
LONDON
SW1A 0AA

Dear Dr Gibson

here is a covering letter to go alongside the papers and review of papers we are also sending you – just highlighting some points we feel are important.

What’s in a name?

This illness has been referred to as “the Disease of A Thousand Names” – this could be due to the heterogeneity of the sufferers currently created by the use of inappropriate research diagnostic criteria.

Illnesses fitting the symptoms of ME/CFS have been recorded as far back as 1900BC, the first British epidemic is thought to have occurred in the time of Henry VIII when it became known as “The English Sweats” – it later became known as “The English Disease” or “muscular Rheumatism”. The illness also impacted on soldiers fighting throughout the centuries with many people returning at the end of the Battle of Agincourt with an ME-like illness, after the American Civil War it was known in America as the “Soldier’s Disease” and most famously Florence Nightingale became ill with what is thought to be this illness during her time as a nurse in the Crimean War.

It was not until the full-blown poliomyeltitis epidemic swept California, and a specific outbreak in Los Angeles in the summer of 1934, described by Gilliam, that ME was actually recognised as a separate illness, it was referred to as atypical poliomyelitis – many people having the symptoms of polio-myelitis without being paralysed. In Britain the next major epidemic occurred in July 1955, at the Royal Free Hospital in London, when it became known as the Royal Free Disease – later being given the name Benign Myalgic Encephalomyelitis by Prof Ramsey – which is also when the illness’ links to poliomyelitis became distanced with polio being reduced by the polio vaccines, and ME continuing to become a problem. Since 1934 over 50 similar clusters have documented. Despite the accurately recorded clinical data from these events, and their characteristic similarities, more than 70 years on, there is still controversy over this most debilitating and complex illness, which has also been called the ‘disease of a thousand names’.

The main problem that people with ME have faced is that doctors believe that because there has been no definitive aetiology and pathogenesis of the illness shown by research, then the illness must be psychosomatic, we must remember that they also thought this of Polio, and that MS was known as “hysterical paralysis” – just because something is unknown, does not mean that it does not exist merely that science, is at present, unable to prove anything – as research techniques improve so the wealth of data of the biological discoveries about the illness grows. The stigma attached to this illness by the scientific community, and the media, has led to people with this illness being victimised at their time of greatest need. Even the CMO report acknowledged that this illness is not just fatigue and should not be reduced to one symptom saying that it is akin to Alzheimers being called Chronic Forgetfulness Syndrome – for Alzheimers is so much more than forgetfulness.

The WHO ICD listing of ME has been that of a neurological Illness for many decades now, it is now listed in WHO ICD-10 G93.3. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome was coined in America by Holmes et al in 1988 the groups there did not like the term and so adapted it to Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS). Many patients do not like the term CFS because they feel that it belittles there illness – defining it as just fatigue – whereas for many sufferers, in particular the severely affected – this is just not the case, fatigue is not their main problem symptom – yes they all have it but often find that the symptom of pain is more difficult to deal with.

The patient group do not like the term CFS as they feel it is derogatory to their condition, however if this name must be kept at present then it must be recognised as an umbrella illness of which Myalgic Encephalomyelitis is one of the illnesses, as is Post Viral Fatigue Syndrome.


What is ME/CFS?

ME/CFS can be both sporadic and epidemic in form, and has no known specific diagnostic test, (although current biomedical research is encouraging) and as yet there is still no known cure, nor is there a treatment which is helpful for everyone. Unfortunately for ME patients, and their carers and families, the illness is still very misunderstood and met with scepticism by some in the medical profession, and other professional bodies.

ME/CFS is characterised by persistent and relapsing debilitating mental and physical fatigue, and this post exertional malaise is characteristically delayed. Patients typically experience an array of symptoms including:- myalgia; arthralgia; cognitive impairment; low-grade fever and flu-like symptoms; swollen lymph nodes; headaches – often severe, and non-refreshing sleep, along with neurological, endocrine and immune dysfunction. For the severely affected ME becomes a multi-system, mutli-organ illness.

ME/CFS is recognised and listed by WHO as a neurological illness – WHO (ICD10:G93.3)

ME/CFS affects all socio-economic groups, and all ages, with the peak incidence being 20-40, with a secondary peak at puberty. There appears to be a female predominance possibly linked to hormone levels. There is evidence to believe it is increasing in all ages. The CMO Report on ME/CFDS (2002) estimated numbers up to 240,000 (0.4% of the population) with an estimated 25% of sufferers being severely affected, although many believe the total numbers are greater than this. The Dowsett/Colby (1996) study also showed that school absence due to ME/CFS showed a rate of 70/100,000 in pupils and 500/100,000 in staff – the largest number for any one illness..

The complexity of this illness means that prognosis is equally difficult to predict. Those who receive an early diagnosis, subsequent understanding, support and appropriate individually tailored management, in partnership with their doctor, tend to be the ones which make the most significant progress. However for many the progress will be slow and gradual over several years. The majority will make variable progress, with relapses, but some may reach 70-80% of normal function, whilst others may continue to deteriorate, and will remain severely affected and house/bedbound for years/decades/lifetime. Many research papers acknowledge, as did the CMO report, that those who have been severely affected for more than 5 years are unlikely to make any significant recovery. The severely affected are a group of patients who will need appropriate health and social care for some years, and maybe a lifetime.

The need for funding and acknowledgement of the biomedical research into the aetiology and pathogenesis of this most complex, debilitating and life-changing disease is urgently needed to help alleviate the pain and suffering of this group of chronically ill and misunderstood patients.



Severely affected

The severely affected are severely overlooked within the realms of research. The very nature of the severity of the illness means that patients are bed/house-bound – going out of the house very rarely. This group make up at least 25% of the ME population. Much ME research requires that the patients are able to travel to the place of research – which the majority are unable to do, they also have to have the ability to withstand the testing of many of the research studies – which they are usually unable to do – particularly as far as treatment is concerned.

This means that the severely affected are not included in the research. Due to the chronic and complex nature of their illness, their hypersensitivity, and multitude of symptoms this means that extrapolating research findings and applying them to the severely affected, is dangerous and irresponsible – particularly as many papers use the Oxford criteria of CFS for which you only need to suffer from unexplainable fatigue.

The severely affected are sometimes used within research papers but they are then lost within the results, this is due to many research papers not putting the patients into sub-groups – meaning that the results relating directly to the severely affected are not extrapolated and are therefore lost. Researchers say that it takes too much time and money to create sub-groups within their results and examine the meaning of the results and as such valuable information is being lost. Where researchers have taken the time to compare the severely affected with those less severely affected they have found differences – showing that this is a worthwhile exercise.


Treatments

The majority of research into treatments such as CBT and GET do not include the severely affected and yet these are the treatments advised for this group – despite research from the patients who show that these treatments do not help and a lot of the time harm the patients – with over 50% of patients who had undertaken GET being made worse by the treatment – some of these severely affected patients were only moderately affected before the treatment. Patient evidence cannot continually be swept under the carpet because they do not like the results.

There also needs to be awareness made that there are discrepancies in the way that treatments are used in the real world – the treatment protocol followed in the research lab is often not followed in the field – leading to people becoming both physically and psychologically damaged as a result of inappropriate GET and CBT treatment.


Sub-groups

Sub-groups need to be looked at, including severity and co-morbidity of other illnesses for the results will then give clearer information. The Karnoffsky scale of severity is a very good indicator for use within research, and allowing the results to at least be split into those mildly, moderately and severely affected will allow researchers to greater understand the impact severity has on their findings.

We, and many researchers, believe that CFS is an umbrella term for many unknown illnesses, for which debilitating fatigue, and post-exertional malaise are core symptoms – subgroups including ME and PVFS. The CDC Fukuda 1994 research criteria creates a too heterogeneous group which does not help patients or researchers – for it encompasses too wide a spectrum, and picks up too many illnesses for which other causes could be identified. The only clinical diagnostic criteria is that of the Canadian Guidelines – research papers have found that this criteria creates a more homogeneous group, also picking up those that are more severely affected – this criteria also allows for those who do not fit the full criteria of CFS to be provisionally diagnosed and treated under the illness “Idiopathic CFS” – this would allow clinics to treat these patients, but the treatments offered to them would be different to those offered for ME/CFS/PVFS.

Jason et al (2005) in their paper on the need for subtypes says “Individuals with CFS have been found to differ with respect to characteristics such as the case definition utilised, psychiatric comorbidity, method of case ascertainment, functional disability, and viral, immunologic, neuroendocrine, neurology, autonomic, and genetic biomarkers (jason et al., 2003a). As a result of this heterogeneity, findings emerging from studies in a number of areas are, at best, discrepant, and at worst, contradictory.” He also said, and this particularly refers to the Oxford, and possibly the Fukuda diagnostic criteria; “ if there is limited reliability of the diagnostic groups studied, because of failure to attend to subtype differences, the results of any study using such diagnostic categories are likely to be unreliable and /or invalid” This is saying that you cannot extrapolate the findings from many studies because of the heterogeneity of the groups used for the studies, especially when using the Oxford criteria, means that often these results cannot be used, due to lack of reliability of application to sufferers.


Research

Since the illness has been known as ME it did not originally bear the brunt of the stigma it now has within the medical and rest of the world. This has been down to a group of psychiatrists from Britain who hijacked the illness for their own psychiatric explanations – their view being that because there is now proof of another explanation it must be a psychosomatic illness. This is now being seen in America where up until the last year or so, the illness has been recognised, including its severity and physical nature of the illness with the CDC listing it as a priority one illness along with AIDS – yet recently the psychiatrists have begun changing the views of the doctors and researchers in the US, patients are now reporting that where doctors were supportive and understanding of the organic and biological nature of their illness, that they were now doubting this, and suggesting the CBT and GET route. Despite the tide now turning in America for the worst they still hold the illness in greater stead than the UK.

There are some Wessley/Cleare papers that are showing the physical changes in the body but then, Wessley does another paper which says it is a psychological illness, which is just plain contradictory and where he simply chooses to ignore the physical results he himself has discovered! – they state that we don’t get better because we hold the belief that we have a physical illness, and if we stop believing in the biological nature of the illness then we will get well – would they say the same to a cancer sufferer – just stop believing that you have cancer and you will get better!!

There appears to be a bias in the research into this illness, especially in the UK with any funding into the aetiology and pathogenesis of this illness primarily coming from patient groups and organisations set up to specifically research into the illness such as MERGE and the CFSRF. This is shown by the funding by the MRC of the PACE and FINE trials – both into treatments which the patients are mainly against and the majority don’t find helpful, and both take the psychiatric point of view – with the MRC having all this funding why are they not funding the wonderful genetic research that is happening in this country. Organisations which do represent the views of the patients feel that this is just throwing good money after bad. Research is desperately needed into subgroups, the aetiology and pathogenesis of this illness. The country also needs to start using the Canadian Diagnostic Criteria so that a more homogeneous group could be used within research and proper diagnosis can be made –there still seems to be a feel that because this is an illness diagnosed by exclusion that all unexplained illnesses which contain fatigue are just diagnosed as CFS.

Further research: if you go on the website: http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed then you will be able to search of abstracts and links to the full articles of many published medical papers.

Good luck with the Inquiry. We will be in London next week for a NICE meeting if you need us any further.

Best wishes



Tanya Harrison
Chairperson - BRAME

SUMMARY OF RESEARCH EVIDENCE ON ME/CFS
COMPILED BY BRAME FOR
PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH INQUIRY ON ME/CFS


All research papers highlighted here have numerous references to other relevant papers

As there are so many papers that could have been presented, we have tried to concentrate on those that highlight the pathogenesis of this illness.

There are papers which we feel are essential that you read in full to give you a broad understanding of the main areas of this illness, along with references to other literature which has already been presented to the Parliamentary libraries by BRAME, following the BRAME meeting in Parliament on 14 May 1998. We strongly suggest reading/referring to the book referred to as the ‘ME Bible’ – “the Clinical and Scientific Basis of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome” by Byron Hyde – which you should find in the Parliamentary library. The book “Enteroviral and Toxin Mediated Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Other Organ Pathologies” by Dr John Richardson is another must read as this gives a good UK background to the illness as well as being based on the study of the illness for fifty years. The other document which you should read is “The Canadian Guidelines” by Carruthers et al1 (which we are sending you) – although this is not a perfect document it is a consensus created review of research and formulation of the only Clinical Diagnostic Criteria and contains advice on diagnosis and treatment – this is also the paper which the ME groups around the world support as being, at present, the best available.


Subgrouping

CFS:The Need for Subtyping

Researchers: Jason et al (2005)2 – USA
Please read this paper

This article provides information concerning the need for the appropriate diagnosis of CFS subtypes and an overview of research papers into this illness concerning the aetiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of ME/CFS.

With particular regard to treatment we must also be highly aware of sub groups. Jason et al has shown that there are distinct sub-groups and it is remiss of doctors to treat CFS/ME as one illness, but rather as a number of illnesses clustered under the heading of CFS. His research shows that:

“It is clear that the current cohort of individuals diagnosed with CFS is a diverse group with varying disease course and disability patterns”

“Similar to disorders such as cancer, it is highly likely that a number of distinct types of CFS exist and that the current method of grouping all individuals who meet diagnostic criteria together is complicating the identification of biological markers of the subgroups.”

“Inevitably, there is some risk that samples of individuals with chronic fatigue and somatic symptoms include those with solely psychiatric diagnoses, with solely CFS diagnoses, and with some CFS and psychiatric comorbidity. Therefore, these three groups need to be differentiated and analyzed separately as opposed to being collapsed into one category.”

“When the HPA axis and sympathetic nervous system become upregulated, possibly due to heightened central nervous system sensitivity to stimuli such as cytokines, secretions of glucocorticoids and catecholamines (adrenalin and noradrenalin) are raised. This could result in a Th1 to Th2 immune response shift, which could impair the body’s defense against viral or intracellular bacterial infections. Once adrenal insufficiency stimulates immune activation, this process can contribute to brain dysfunction (Komaroff, 2000b). Further, the process might occur in different intensities and stages for different patients, thereby necessitating the need to subtype individuals on this dimension. For some individuals, cortisol levels are within normal ranges, whereas it is not for others. This might represent a critical dimension to understand the pathophysiology of this illness. Although no virus has been identified as the primary cause of CFS, the immune system seems to be fighting a virus in some patients, as evidenced by the RNase-L pathway. Evidence also points to neurological findings including hyperintense signals on MRI scans (Lange et al., 1998) and autonomic dysfunction (primarily neurally mediated hypotension; Schondorf and Freeman, 1999). In this review, we have only covered several of the subtypes that have been more extensively studied. There are other more recent subtypes, for example, the finding of chronic phase lipids in the majority of patients with CFS (Hokama et al., 2003), increased DNA fragmentation in muscle tissues of patients with FM (Sprott et al., 2004), or a deficiency in the expression of STAT1 proteins in about 30% of patients with CFS (Knox et al., 2004). Many of the dimensions reviewed are worthy of efforts at subtyping in future studies. As stated by Glaser et al. (2005), inconsistent patterns of immune markers may be due to our present knowledge base in fields such as virology and immunology, and as we learn more about the immune system and new types of immune cells and cytokines are discovered, there may be other links to CFS that will help us better understand the aetiology of pathophysiology of subtypes.”

“The identification of clinically significant subgroups is the logical next step in furthering CFS research. Some individuals might be at higher risk of developing this chronic activation due to genetic vulnerabilities or to constitutional or psychological factors. There might be multiple pathways leading to the cause and maintenance of the neurobiologic disregulations and other symptoms experienced by individuals with CFS. Depending upon the individual and subtype, these may include unique biological, genetic, neurological, psychological, and socioenvironmental contributions. Subgrouping is the key to understanding how CFS begins, how it is maintained, how medical and psychological variables influence its course, and in the best case, how it can be prevented, treated, and cured.”

This review suggests that there is a need for a greater diagnostic clarity and this might be accomplished by sub-groups. Fukuda et al (1994) when creating there research criteria, which is used world-wide as the CDC 1994 Criteria for CFS, also called for subgrouping within the identified group of individuals with CFS – thus suggesting an awareness that they were creating a criteria which would identify a heterogeneous group of patients, this was highlighted by Jason et al (1999d)3 and paraphrased by Jason et al (2004) showing that “the US case definition for CFS (Fukuda 1994)4 is characterised by vaguely worded criteria that lack operational definitions and guidelines to assist healthcare professionals in their interpretation and application of the diagnostic tool.” The Canadian Clinical Diagnostic Criteria in comparison with the Fukuda criteria (Jason et al 2004)5 however creates a more homogeneous group selecting “cases with less psychiatric comorbidity, more physical functional impairment, and more fatigue/weakness, neuropsychiatric, and neurology symptoms.” (neuropsychiatric referring to cognitive dysfunction) “The Canadian case definition does include these critical symptoms (post-exertional malaise, memory and concentration problems) and use of such types of case definitions might aid in the selection of more homogeneous samples.”

As Jason shows sub-grouping is vital, not just levels of severity – which is not based on how long you have the illness, although this does create an impacting effect, but more on the levels of disability. Until we start trying to find the sub-groups of patients and stop creating such heterogeneous diagnostic research criteria, and using such to complete research, then we are not going to get such helpful results. The importance of the need for proper diagnostic criteria to be used within both clinical diagnosis and research cannot be reduced. The constant use of Oxford criteria within research leads to misleading research data as the only symptom needed to fulfil the Oxford criteria is fatigue. Fatigue on its own is not indicative of this illness, that is just Chronic Fatigue – this is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, one of the subgroups of which is ME, and by definition a syndrome must compose of many symptoms, this is shown in this paper by the comment “the results of any study using such diagnostic categories are likely to be unreliable and/or invalid” – see also covering letter.

CARDIOVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ME/CFS

This is an important section for the Group to be aware of, as the sudden death, particularly of young people with severe ME in their 20’s and early 30’s, is often heart failure. They either collapse, or are found dead in their beds by their carers.

Abnormal Impedance Cardiography Predicts Symptom Severity in CFS

Researchers: Arnold Peckerman, Ben Natelson et al (2003 – USA)6

This is an important research paper that needs to be read. It may well provide some real answers to, if not the majority of ME sufferers, a sub-group of patients. We are also submitting 2 summaries of this paper, which may make it easier to understand the implications of this research. One ‘CFS is Heart Failure Secondary to Mitochondrial Malfunction’ by Dr Sarah Myhill who treats patients in the UK, and one ‘The Heart of the Matter: CFS and Cardiac Issues’ an interview with Dr Paul Cheney7, who has treated patients in the USA for more than 20 years.

This research at the New Jersey Medical Centre was funded by a multi-million dollar grant from the National Institute of Health (NIH). The US Government had wanted the research to try and find a physiological parameter that could be objectively measured and would correlate with the level of disability of the patient.

The researchers identified accumulating evidence to a possible problem with circulation in CFS. The reported findings included autonomic dysfunction, lower plasma volume and/or red cell mass, and abnormalities in neurohormonal systems of circulatory control. Although on their own abnormalities would be insufficient to cause a circulatory dysfunction, cumulatively they could produce significant deficiencies in organ blood flow and symptoms. Previous studies showed reduced blood flow to muscles using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and nuclear imaging found evidence of post-exercise reduction in brain blood flow in CFS.

The researchers hypothesised that CFS patients have a reduced cardiac output, and they would measure this, using noninvasive impedance cardiography. Early analyses however indicated that reduction in cardiac output was characteristic of the patients most severely affected with CFS, rather than all patients with CFS. To meet the criteria for severe CFS, patients had to meet the more stringent 1988 CDC case definition, which requires >50% reduction in activities and 7 or more of the symptoms listed in the case definition, and at least 7 of those symptoms had to be substantial, or worse in severity, in the previous month. The patients were divided into severe and less severe for this study. The study also wanted to identify whether there are relationships between low cardiac output and specific CFS symptoms, which would be useful for further research.

Patients were tested in a temperature controlled room between 11 am and 1 pm. The study consisted of a 10 minute period of supine rest (laying down) followed by a 5 minute period of quiet standing. Impedance cardiograms were computer scored and edited without the subject group status to provide measures of stroke volume and pre-ejection period. Heart rate was measured from the electrocardiograph. Mean arterial pressure was recorded in synchrony with impedance cardiography.

Statistical analysis of the effects of illness were examined in analysis of variance for the severe, less severe and control groups on measurements taken in supine and standing positions. Symptom patterns descriptive of the severe CFS and their relationships with cardiac output were explored, respectively, with stepwise logistic and multiple regression analyses, using P<0.05 criteria for entry or removal. P<0.05 means there is a possibility that the association between the factor and the outcome is due to chance – so 0.01 means a 1% chance, and 0.0001 a 1 in 10,000 chance.

They found:
• Patients with severe CFS had lower supine stroke volume (P<0.03)
• Cardiac output (Q) was significantly lower in group with severe CFS, both in supine and standing positions (P0.03). From the graph, controls and less severe CFS patients showed a cardiac output of about 7 litres per minute when supine and about 4.8 on standing. For the severely affected the Q values of cardiac output are just over 5 litres supine and drops to about 3.5 litres standing. (this level is thought to be borderline for organ failure)
Looking at comparisons of reported symptoms of severe and less severe – post-exertional malaise and sore throats emerged as significant differences between the groups – providing correct identification for 88..5% of patients (P0.05 and 0.005)
• Lower cardiac output (the mean of supine and standing values) was associated with greater severity ratings for post-exertional fatigue and fever/chills, and lower ratings for a problem with memory and concentration (P<0.0001, 0.008, and 0.006 respectively).
• Comparison within the study illustrated the degree to which low levels of cardiac output in CFS patients were specifically related to the symptoms characteristic of severe CFS
• As a specific example of the relationship between post-exertional fatigue and cardiac output, increases in tiredness, after the testing, as measured by changes in the AD ACL energy scores, tended to be greater in patients with lower cardiac output (P<0.006)

Conclusions
• The correlation coefficient of 0.46 with P value of 0.0002 suggests that the disability level of those that were disabled was exactly proportional to the severity of their Q defect (Q stands for cardiac output in litres per minute)
• Results provide initial evidence of reduced cardiac output
• Suggests that in some CFS patients, blood pressure is maintained at the cost of restricted flow, possibly resulting in low circulatory state
• Therefore at times daily activities and demands for blood flow are not adequately met, compromising metabolic processes, in at least some vascular compartments.
• This finding would signify that some cases of CFS might be explained and potentially treated as low circulation problems.
• Several deficiencies capable of affecting cardiac output have been reported in CFS, including lower blood volume, impaired venous regulation and changes in autonomic, endocrine and cardiac function
• A percentage of patients with symptoms of CFS may in fact have covert heart disease
• Abnormalities causing a reduction in cardiac output in CFS may be dispersed over multiple body systems and changes in any of them may be subtle and difficult to detect
• This study does suggest interpretations regarding the causes of reduced cardiac output in severe CFS. The reduction in stroke volume was more clearly seen in the supine position and tended to improve during standing, indicating worsened cardiac performance under conditions of augmented preload.
• Contractility or diastolic function could affect stroke volume. Although this pattern is consistent with cardiac dysfunction, it could also be due to circulatory, neurogenic and endocrinologic abnormalities.
• Lack of heart rate differences does not preclude the possibility patients are moderately hypovolemic
• Reduction in cardiac output in CFS patients is unlikely to be due to deconditioning
• Secondary analyses, relating cardiac output to specific symptoms, found that post-exertional fatigue and symptoms in the infectious category, were the most characteristic in patients with severe CFS, and severity of these symptoms was associated with lower cardiac output
• Ratings of cognitive impairment were not predictive of reduced cardiac output. This suggests that problems outside of circulation produce cognitive deficits in CFS
• Reduction in cardiac output in CFS is not likely to fall within abnormal range, but this should not detract from the physiological significance. Even marginal reduction in cardiac output can result in selective under-perfusion of various organs and systems of the body, eg autoregulation, digestion in the gut etc
(Please also read Dr Myhill’s and Dr Cheney’s analysis of this paper)



CFS is Heart Failure Secondary to Mitochondrial Malfunction

Paper by Dr Sarah Myhill – UK8

Dr Myhill has written this paper and interpreted Dr Peckerman’s paper on Abnormal Impedance Cardiography very eloquently. She explains the impact of reduced cardiac output on all of the organs of the body. However she has taken the evidence a step further to mitchondrial malfunction.

Poor blood supply:

• Effects on skin – shut down of blood supply to the skin has 2 main effects – (1) patients become intolerant of heat – cannot lose heat through the skin so core temperature increases – to compensate body switches off the thyroid gland – giving a compensatory underactive thyroid – worsening the problem of fatigue. (2) Body cannot sweat – unable to help remove toxins from body
• Muscles – with impaired blood supply, muscles quickly run out of oxygen on exercise – they go into anaerobic metabolism – producing lactic acid – making muscles ache
• Liver and Gut – results in inefficient digestion in the gut, poor production of digestive juices and leaky gut syndrome (LGS). LGS cause other problems such as allergies, autoimmunity, malabsorption etc. Poor circulation in the liver results in poor detoxification eg heavy metals, pesticides, volatile compounds and toxins form gut fermentation
• Brain – Seeing scans of CFS patients Dr Myhill would have diagnosed strokes as blood supply to some areas of the brain was so impaired. This default is temporary and with rest, blood supply recovers. This however explains the multiplicity of brain symptoms, also brain cells are not well stocked with mitochondria, so run out of energy quickly.
• Heart – 2 effects – the first effect of poor micro-circulation to the heart is disturbance of the electrical conductivity causing dysrhythmias. Many CFS patients complain of palpitations, missed heart beats. The second is poor exercise tolerance. Heart muscle fatigues causing chest pain and fatigue. Long term it can cause heart valve defects because muscles holding the mitral valve open also fatigue. The difference between this type of heart failure and medically recognised congestive heart failure is that CFS patients protect themselves from organ failure because of their fatigue symptoms.
• Lung and Kidney – these organs are relatively protected from poor micro-circulation, because they have the largest renin angiotensin system, which keeps blood pressure up in these organs, so less likely to see CFS patients with kidney failure or pulmonary hypoperfusion.

Mitochondrial Malfunction – explanation of fatigue problems in CFS patients

Energy to the body is supplied by mitochondria, which produce Nicotinamide Adenosine Diphosphate (NAD) and Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP). Almost all energy requiring processes in the body uses NAD and ATP, but largely ATP. The reserves of ATP in a cell are very small eg a heart muscle cell has only enough ATP to last about 10 contractions. Therefore mitochondria have to be extremely good at recycling ATP to keep the cell constantly supplied with energy. If not this causes symptoms of weakness and poor stamina. The cell literally has to ‘hibernate’ and wait until more ATP is manufactured.

In producing energy, ATP (3 phosphates) is converted into ADP (2 phosphates). ADP is recycled back through mitochondria to produce ATP. But if the cell is pushed for more energy it will use ADP instead. The body can create energy from ADP to AMP (1 phosphate) – but AMP cannot be recycled. The only way that ADP can be regenerated is by making it from fresh ingredients, and this can take days to do. This explains the delayed fatigue seen in CFS. When patients ‘hit a brick wall’ this is because they have no ATP or ADP to function at all. This series of reactions is known as the Kreb’s Citric Acid Cycle and a process of oxidative phosphorylation. For ATP to cross the mitochondrial membrane it needs acetyl-L-carnitine and for ADP to cross back through the membrane it needs L-carnitine. Need a healthy diet and/or supplements to support this process.

Dr Myhill goes on in her paper to say how these problems might be addressed and possibly treated.


Prevalence of Abnormal Cardiac Wall Motion in the Cardiomyopathy Associated with Incomplete Multiplication of Epstein-Barr Virus and/or Cytomegalovirus in Patients with CFS

Researchers: Lerner et al (2004 – USA)9 -Abstract

The researchers reported unique incomplete herpes virus Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and/or non-structural (HCMV) cytomegalovirus multiplication in 2 distinct subsets of CFS patients. The CFS subsets were identified by:
• Presence of IgM serum antibodies to HCMV nonstructural gene products p52 and CM2 (UL44 and UL57 and/or
• IgM serum antibodies to EBV viral capsid antigen (EBV, VCA IgM)
• Diagnostic IgM serum antibodies were found in 2 independent blinded studies involving 49 CFS patients, but the same antibodies were absent in 170 controls (P<0.05)
• Abnormal 24 hour electrocardiographic monitoring, tachycardias at rest and, in severe chronic cases, abnormal cardiac wall motion (ACWM) were seen in these same CFS patients

The Group now report a prospective consecutive case control study form 1987-1999 of cardiac dynamics as measured by radionuclide ventriculography in 98 CFS aptients from 1987-1999. Controls were patients with various malignancies who were evaluated in protocols requiring radionuclide ventriculography before intitiation of cardiotoxic chemotherapeutic agents.

• The prevalence of abnormal cardiac wall motion (ACWM) at rest in CFS patients was 10 out of 87 patients (11.5%).
• With stress exercise, 21 patients (24.1%) demonstrated ACWM
• Cardiac biopsies in 3 of these CFS patietns with ACWM showed a cardiomyopathy
• Among the controls, ACWM at rest was present in 4 out of 191 patients (2%) – (P=0.0018)

The researchers conclude that a progressive cardiomyopathy, caused by incomplete virus multiplication of EBV and/or HCMV in CFS patients is present.

NB: Dr Betty Dowsett and Dr John Richardson (now deceased) worked with ME patients for over 50
Years. Both felt enteroviruses were highly implicated in the disease process of ME, and they also felt the enterovirus ended up in the heart. Excellent information can be found in Dr John Richardson’s book on Enteroviruses, and a documented history of his patients over 50 years.



Cardiac Involvement in Patients with CFS as Documented with Holter and Biopsy Data in Birmingham, Michigan 1991-1993

Researchers: Martin Lerner, James Goldstein et al (1997 – USA)10
Excellent paper that needs to be read

The researchers have observed that abnormal oscillating T-waves (eg falttening and/or inversions) in one or both pre-cordial leads (modified lead 1 or V5) at Holter monitoring are integral to CFS. In CFS patients, oscillating abnormal T-waves were regularly seen with the onset of sinus tachycardia, and the abnormal T-waves then resolved with reappearance of normal sinus rhythms.

Despite an absence of any known associated diseases in CFS patients, every CFS patient, but only 22.4% of the non-CFS patients, showed abnormal oscillating T-wave flattenings or inversions at Holter monitoring (P<0.01)

Mention is given here of another study by Rowe et al who reported abnormal tilt-table testing in a high proportion of CFS patients. They suspected an abnormal neural reflex or another unknown cause for their findings. (this is now a well recognised characteristic with many CFS patients.

A previous study by Lerner et al (pub 1994) showed 24% of 87 nonselected CFS patients from a recent consecutive case series exhibited left ventricular dysfunction, by stress radioisotopic multiple gated acquisition (blood pool image) (MUGA) method. They found abnormal left ventricular dynamics in patients in Birmingham 1987-94. Abnormal cardiac wall motion at rest and stress, dilation of left ventricle, and segmental wall motion abnormalities. Left ventricular ejection fractions at rest and with exercise, of as low as 30% were seen in CFS patients.

This study compares the prevalence of the abnormal T-wave oscillations at Holter monitoring in a new consecutive case series of CFS patients, with a similar case series in non-CFS patients from a cardiology practice. Also report on light and electron microscopic findings from right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies in 9 CFS patients. Abnormal T-wave oscillations (T-wave flattenings or T-wave inversions) of at least 25 normally conducted beats were necessary to be considered abnormal. These T-waves varied in frequency and depth, frequently appearing only with the advent of sinus tachycardias. Usually reverted to normal upright T-waves when the cardiac rate decreased to <100 bpm, often with sinus tachycardias >120 bpm T-wave inversions deepened further.

Sensitivity and specificity of T-wave inversions and T-wave flattenings in the diagnosis of CFS were calculated. Sensitivity was defined as the percentage of patients with CFS who met abnormal Holter monitoring findings, whereas specificity was measured by the percentage of non-CFS patients without these abnormalities. The predictive accuracy of T-wave inversions and flattenings for determining the presence or absence of CFS was calculated.
• 49 of 51 CFS patients exhibited oscillating abnormal T-wave flattenings – being a sensitive indicator of CFS, but this Holter monitoring abnormality is not specific.
• T-wave inversions are a less sensitive indicator of CFS, but they are a more specific finding
• Analysis of the combination of T-wave inversions and T-wave flattenings did not enhance the predictive value of these tests.

Light and Electron Microscopy of Cardiac Biopsies:

9 CFS patients underwent right ventricular endomyocardial biopsies. Specimens were taken from the right ventricular septum. 2 specimens were examined by light, and the other 7 by light and electron microscopy.
• One of the biopsies showed lymphocytic myocarditis
• 6 patients showed myocardial fibre hypertrophy
• 5 patients showed myofibre disarray
• 3 patients showed focal interstitial fibrosis
• 5 patients showed perimysial fat infiltration
• 6 patients showed increased mitochondria
• 5 patients showed increased fat droplets and increased lipofuscin granules in myofibres
• No patient showed myofibre necrosis, however one muscle fibre, in patient 4, under electron microscopy showed focal myofibre necrosis. These changes describe an early cardiomyopathy.

Conclusion:

8 of the 9 patients had a cardiomyopathic changes, and one had an inflammatory myocarditis. (This is an important study as sudden deaths in ME/CFS sufferers, especially in their 20’s and 30’s is due to cardiomyopathy – usually severe sufferers - who are found in their beds.

The abnormal oscillating T-wave flattenings and T-wave inversions at Holter monitoring, appear to be an essential element to the pathological physiology of the cardiomyopathy of CFS, and was an accurate indicator of the possible presence of CFS.


Circulating Blood Volume in CFS

Researchers: David Streeton and David Bell (1998 – USA)11
These are two very well respected researchers in the cardiovascular field relating to CFS.

They acknowledge that observations have linked CFS with neurally mediated hypotension and delayed orthostatic intolerance. Previous studies of the pathogenesis of both hyperadrenergic and hypoadrenergic orthostatic hypotension have shown that, in addition to the most invariable finding of excessive orthostatic blood pooling in the lower limbs attributable to subnormal venous constriction of the legs, reduction of red blood cell (RBC) mass is frequently present.

RBC mass and plasma volume were determined with standard methods, using 51Cr-labelled autologous red blood cells and 125I-labelled human serum albumin, respectively, in 5 university radiology departments.

A subnormal RBC mass and/or decreased circulating blood volume may well result in diminished cerebral blood flow with subnormal oxygen-carrying capacity. 3 patients in this study had normal RBC mass and plasma volume, but had similar symptomology. (? Sub-group)

The high prevalence of reduced RBC mass in these patients with severe CFS suggests that this abnormality may well be important to the pathogenesis of their persisting symptoms. Post polio fatigue bears striking resemblance to CFS. Hereditary factors may also play a role, perhaps through effects on autonomic nervous system function. Whatever its initiating cause, CFS may be perpetuated, at least in part, by low RBC mass in many patients.

Acetlycholine Mediated Vasodilation in the Microcirculation of Patients with CFS

Researchers: Vance Spence, Neil Abbot et al (2003 – UK) – funded by MERGE12
This will be a brief synopsis as MERGE will be presenting their research findings independently.

Research into this illness is hindered by the considerable heterogeneity (eg ME, CFS, PVFS, CFIDS) seen across patients, but several reports have highlighted disturbances in cholinergic mechanisms in terms of the central nervous system (CNS) activity neuromuscular function and auto-antibodies to muscarinic receptors. Apart from its neurotransmitter functions, acetylcholine is a well established and prominent vasodilator, whose action is dependent upon an intact layer of functioning endothelial cells that line the lumen of all blood vessels. This study looks at acetylcholine, and its role as generalised vasodilator.

A common test of endothelial integrity is the response of blood vessels to both endothelial-dependent vasodilators like acetycholine and endothelial-independent vasodilators like Nitric Oxide (NO) via an NO donor like sodium nitroprusside.

In most medical conditions associated with cardiovascular disease there is a blunted response to acetylcholine. However in MERGE's studies they have reported increased responses to a cumulative dose regime of Acetylcholine (Ach) delivered by iontophoresis into the microcirculation of CFS patients when compared to controls.

In 3 separate studies by these researchers they have demonstrated:
• Abnormalities of the ACH endothelium-dependent vasodilator pathway in CFS patients
• Sensitivity to Ach seems to be restricted to those patients within the CFS construct who fit descriptions for ME, PVFS, but not Gulf War Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, or Organophosphate exposure
• Increased sensitivity to ACh is normally associated with trained athletes, while CFS patients are characterised by having a substantial reduction in previous levels of activities
• Results are important in terms of vascular control mechanisms in this patient group and may be relevant to some of the unusual vascular symptoms, such as hypotension and the problems of orthostatic stability that is evident in most CFS patients.
• These findings are specific to endothelial cholinergic activity and may or may not be applicable to other more widespread neurotransmitter functions of Ach.

Recent evidence in a very small group of patients suggested that CFS might be the consequnece of cholinergic dysautonomia and that treatment with cholinesterase inhibiting agents might well be therapeutic. Such a hypothesis is in direct contrast with the findings of these studies so great CAUTION is needed in treating an illness with such heterogenity. It is important that the mechanisms underlying the pattern of abnormal peripheral endothelial cholinergic activity that this study has described in CFS patients is unravelled and that significance of altered cholinesterase activity, the prostanoid pathway and the role of endothelium-derived hyperpolarising factor (EDHF) is determined.

Two other papers from this group of scientists at MERGE with similar studies:

‘Enhanced Sensitivity of the Peripheral Cholinergic Vascular Response ion Patients with CFS’
‘Prolonged Acetylcholine-induced Vasodilation in the Peripheral Microcirculation of Patients with CFS’

Myalgic Encepahlomyelitis (ME) a Haemorheological Disorder Manifested as Impaired Capillary Blood Flow

Researcher: Dr Leslie Simpson (mid 1990’s – New Zealand) – Please read this paper

Dr Les Simpson was one of 3 amazing doctors, who despite being in their 80’s, had worked so hard to understand this complex and debilitating illness and most of all to help their patients. The other two are Dr Betty Dowsett, who worked with Dr Melvin Ramsey in the 1950’s and Dr John Richardson, sadly now passed away, both of whom continued with seeing and helping patients, and with their research into this illness.

Dr Les Simpson travelled the world to meet with ME patients and give talks to groups. Despite collecting thousands of blood samples from ME sufferers around the world and testing them, he, like many researchers into the pathophysiology of ME, had great difficulty in getting his research published. Now cardiovascualr problems are being more acknowledged in ME his work is being recognised.
BRAME published his paper in our newsletter ME TODAY issue 7 in March 1998, a copy of which has been sent for inquiry, please do try to read this paper.

• In his research over the past decade, Dr Simpson has found that more than 80% of ME patients have changed red blood cell shape population
• His earlier published work with ME patients showed altered blood rheology and subsequent tests using scanning electron microscopy of immediately fixed blood samples, which provided a basis for understanding the poor blood filterability.
• The blood of ME patients contains higher than usual proportions of one or other of the different cell shapes, notably increased percentages of cup transformed cells (stomatocytes), which are considered as a ‘marker’ for ‘acute ‘ ME, however these may persist for some years.
• Data presented at the Cambridge Symposium in 1990 also showed that increased cup forms was the most common change, but it also showed that a smaller number of both sexes had increased cells with altered margins. Increase percentages of these cells, or of flat cells or cells with surface changes are markers for ‘chronic’ ME.
• Impaired capillary blood flow results in inadequate rates of delivery of oxygen and nutrient substrates, having the greatest adverse effect on the tissues with great metabolic activity and high demand for substrates, eg muscles and glands
• Nervous tissue is particularly sensitive to oxygen deprivation – the brain has no capacity to store oxygen and can store only a minuscule amount of glucose. Normal brain function is dependent on normal rates of capillary blood flow to deliver these metabolites.
• Such observations imply that when reduced cerebral blood flow can be demonstrated brain function must be impaired commensurately.
• While it is claimed that psychological, psychiatric and cognitive problems are features of ME, it seems more likely that such morbidity is due to impaired cerebral blood flow.
• The different cell shapes, and an associated reduction in cell flexibility reduces their capacity to pass through capillaries smaller in diameter than the cell. This slows the flow of blood and increases it viscosity. As a result the oxygen, nutrients and hormones transported in the blood are delivered at a reduced rate and cell exhaustion may occur.
• A percentage of the population has unusually small capillaries that leaves them at risk of developing ME-like symptoms if their red cells become less flexible.
• The most severe symptoms will be associated with tissues and organs containing the smallest capillaries. This could account for different ME patients having a slightly different cluster of symptoms.
• The hypothalamus has an extremely dense capillary bed. Decreased blood flow to this part of the brain would account for the cognitive problems, sleep disturbances and emotional lability experiences by people with ME.
• The changes in red blood cell shapes correlate to physical and emotional stresses experienced by the patient, and patients who have improved can relapse following over-exertion.
• Capillary size cannot be changed. The solution is to try to improve the shape and flexibility of the red blood cells so they will flow more easily through the capillaries.

Dr Simpson suggests some possible treatments (not cures) to help patients improve.
• For those with cup-transformed cells – B12 injections help 50% (why the other 50% do not respond is not known)
• For those with other types of red cell shape change – 70% or more of cases respond to evening primrose oil. The effects of the oil are to increase the blood levels of prostaglandin E1. This hormone has been shown to increase red cell flexibility. Those who do not respond to evening primrose oil should explore the effects of fish oil rich in omega-3 fatty acids. These fatty acids improve red cell flexibility by a different mechanism to that of evening primrose oil. The suggested dose is 2 x 1000 mg capsules with food 3 times daily

NB: There has recently been a study published by Dr Basant Puri, who works at a London Hospital, that omega-3 fish oils are helpful for patients with ME/CFS. He wishes to extend these studies but has been unable to secure further funding.


Central Nervous System – Brain

Gray Matter – Volume Reduction in CFS

Research (Floris P de Lange et al - Netherlands 2004)13 mapping structural cerebral morphology and volume, by using high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images, using voxel-based morphometry. Additionally they also recorded physical activity levels to explore the relation between severity of symptoms and cerebral abnormalities. This research has shown that there is:-
• Significant global gray matter volume reduction in the CFS patients compared to controls.
• This decline in gray matter volume appeared to be more prominent in those patients who were more severely affected.
• This is an important and significant find as it is showing a possible link between the reduction of gray matter and the severity of illness.
• Found a significant 8% reduction of gray matter volume compared with healthy controls.
• This research shows that the Central Nervous System (CNS) plays a key role in the aetiology and pathophysiology of CFS.
• It points to a new objective and quantitative tool for clinical diagnosis of this disabling disorder.

¬
Mechanisms underlying fatigue: a voxel-based morphometric study of CFS

Research by Tomohisa Okada et al – Japan 200414 – MRI using voxel-based morphometry. This research has shown:-

• A significant reduction in gray-matter volume/atrophy in the bilateral prefrontal cortex areas of CFS patients
• The affected areas extended from BA8 to 9 in the right cerebral hemisphere and from BA9 to 11 in the left.
• In the study, right dorsolateral prefrontal-cortex atrophy was significantly correlated with the severity of fatigue.
• Study felt similar clinical manifestations of CFS and MS suggests a common pathogenesis underlying the symptoms of fatigue in both illnesses. This speculation is supported by the fact L-carnitine has been found to improve fatigue in both sets of patients.
• Found large decrease in acetyl-L-carnitine. This could be due to hypofunction of the frontal sub-cortical circuits, or the decrease could be due to the remote effects of the pathology in the dorsolateral prefrontoal cortex.
• This relates to the model by Chaudhuri and Behan (Fatigue and Basal Ganglia 2000) hypofunction of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex might interrupt the associate striato-thalamo-corticol loop, resulting in enhanced fatigability.
• These results are consistent with previous reports of an abnormal distribution of acetyl-L-carnitine uptake, which is one of the biochemical markers of CFS, in the prefrontal cortex.
• Therefore the prefrontal cortex might be an important element of the neural system that regulates sensations of fatigue.
• The gray matter volume was reduced on average 11.8% in CFS patients, and in some areas up to 16.9% compared to healthy controls.

MERGE has an appraisal paper on these 2 research papers, which is easy to read, and highlights some of the main points. It also discusses whether the reduction in gray matter is the ‘cause’ or the ‘consequence’ of the illness. Important that 2 separate research groups have found correlations between loss of gray matter and patients symptoms/severity.

MERGE has also being doing research with oxidative stress and feel that it is possible that this could involved as gray matter of the brain appears more susceptible to oxidative stress than white matter, and is the likely primary target of oxidative stress at all ages. There are a number of reports now linking raised levels of oxidative stress in the tissues with ME/CFS.


Brain Magnetic Resonance (MR) in CFS

Research by Greco, Tannock, Brostoff, Costa (1997)15 to determine the prevalence of MR white matter abnormalities in patients with CFS. Studies found:-
• Although abnormalities were found in some patients, this was not specific to CFS.
• However there was a trend toward more abnormalities in the CFS subgroup of patients with no depression or associated other psychiatric disorders than in the control group.
• Some showed fronto-parietal subcortical white matter foci of high T2 signal.


Brainstem Perfusion is Impaired in CFS

Research by Costa, Tannock, Brostoff (1995)16. Research showed:-
• Widespread reduction of regional brain perfusion in 24 ME/CFS patients compared to 24 normal controls.
• Hypoperfusion of the brainstem was marked and constant
• A larger study of 146 subjects – including with depression, psychiatric disorders and epilepsy. Brain perfusion ratios were calculated using Tc-HMPAO and SPET with GE Neurocam
• Brainstem hypoperfusion was confirmed in all ME/CFS patients
• The ME/CFS patients with no psychiatric disorders showed significantly lower brainstem hypoperfusion than depressed patients.
• Patients with ME/CFS have a generalised reduction of brain perfusion, with a particular pattern of hypoperfusion of the brainstem.


Altered CNS signal during motor performance in CFS

Research by Vlodek Siemionow et al (2004 – USA)17

Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine whether brain activity of CFS patients during voluntary motor actions differs from that of healthy individuals.

8 CFS patients and 8 matched controls performed isometric handgrip contractions at 50% maximal voluntary contraction level. They first performed 50 contractions with a 10 sec rest between adjacent trial – Non-Fatigue Task (NFT).Subsequently the same number of contractions was performed with only a 5 sec rest between trials – Fatigue Task (FT). 58 channels of surface EEG were recorded simultaneously from the scalp. Spectrum analysis was performed to estimate power of EEG frequency in different tasks. Motor activity-related corticol potential (MRCP) was derived by triggered averaging of EEG signals associated with the muscle contractions

Results of study:
• Motor performance of the CFS patients was poorer than the controls
• Relative power of EEG theta frequency band (4-8Hz) during performing the NFT and FT tasks was significantly greater in the CFS than control group
• The amplitude of MRCP negative potential (NP) for the combined NFT and FT tasks was higher in the CFS than control group
• Within the CFS group the NP was greater for the FT than NFT task, whereas there was no difference in the control group

Conclusion: These results clearly show that CFS involves altered central nervous system signals in controlling voluntary muscle activities, especially when the activities induce fatigue. Physical activity-induced EEG signal changes may serve as physiological markers for more objective diagnosis of CFS.


A Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – related proteome in human cerebrospinal fluid

Research by Baranuick et al – 2005 –USA18 – This paper needs to be read as there are many significant findings. Some findings are:-
• Independently tested cohort 1 pooled group, and then a separate individually tested cohort 2 group.
• SF-36 Scores: The pooled CFS group (cohort1) and CFS individuals (cohort 2) had equivalent scores for each domain. The CFS scores for most domains were significantly different from the respective healthy control scores (domains listed in the paper). Their presence in the CFS-associated proteome suggested a potential pathophysiological link.
• Proteomics of Cohort 1 - The 20 proteins detected in CFS patients, but not in the healthy controls, were defined as the ‘cohort 1 pooled CFS proteome’, The most pertinent of these matched proteins had probable origins in plasma or the central nervous system (see paper for more details)
• Proteomics of Cohort 2 – there were 16 proteins found only in the CFS patients of the second individualised study, identified as the ‘cohort 2 CFS-related proteome’.
• These 2 independent assessments identified 10 of these 16 proteins shared by the cohort 1 and cohort 2 CFS proteomes – and not detectable in healthy samples.
• This degree of protein matching between 2 independent populations of CFS patients was highly unlikely to be a random event.
• Some proteins identified were significantly associated with CFS status and gender. It suggests that other gender-related factors may be found in future surveys given the female predominance.
• Predictive statistical model for CFS from cohort 2 – Multilogistic analysis demonstrated that a smaller set of 5 proteins could identify all of the cohort 2 CFS subjects. They were α-2-mac, APLP1, K16, OMD2, and PEDF. Subjects who had detectable levels of at least 1 out of these 5 proteins had an odds ratio of 34.5 in favour of having CFS regardless of gender. This new ‘biosignature’ variable of having ≥ 1 out of 5 proteins present in the cerebrospinal fluid was defined as B1/5
• This was used in a logistical model to predict CFS status for the subjects in cohort 2 –
CFS status = gender + B1/5
• The model was significant (converged asymptotically) and had a concordance rate of 80%. To the researchers knowledge this is the first model to predict CFS status based solely on objective data.
• The CFS-associated proteome and B1/5 were consistent with the researchers’ hypothesis that a common pathological mechanism was shared by the CFS spectrum of illnesses, and was independent of the set of symptoms expressed by each individual.
• This research showed a differential protein expression in this syndrome
• Further studies could possibly refine the CFS-related proteome and the terms of the biosignature variable for predicting CFS status and related syndromes, from other fatigue and chronic pain states, and inflammatory central nervous system disorders.
• Antiproteases, antioxidant, pro- and anti-inflammatory proteins suggested activation of the cerebrospinal innate immune system.
• Significantly more frequent detection of heme scavengers in CFS (55%) compared to healthy controls (15%). Number of CNS conditions may lead to localized bleeding with haemoglobin release with the induction of heme sequestering proteins. One large group meeting these characteristics are the cerebral amyloid angiopathies (CAA) (cerebrovascular amyloidosis). CAA syndromes are defined by protien misfolding, perivascular amyloid deposition, weakening of vessel walls, micorhaemorrhages to severe cerebral infarction, and dementia or sudden death in 3rd to 5th decades. The CFS spectrum of illnesses do not show higher than normal rates of death in this way so felt unlikely to be due to a currently identified CAA syndrome. However the researchers hypothesise that a mild, focally transient or reversible form that does not lead to either permanently damaging or lethal haemorrhage or dementia may occur in CFS. This hypothesis would explain many of the parallels between the proteins associated with CAA syndromes and the CFS-related proteome.
• Other components of CFS-related proteome promote amyloid deposition – these become activated in amyloidosis and Alzheimer’s disease
• Hypothesize that the presence of keratin 16 in CFS-associated proteome was an indication of epithelial cell activation within the CNS in CFS
• The ‘protein swapping’ mechanism detected is analogous to a DNA recombination-like process
• An alternative to the CAA hypothesis is glial cell activation with the release of innate immune and regulatory factors. Activation of leptomeningeal cells with the secretion of several of the proteins listed. CFS syndromes may be initiated by unknown factors that activate these cells, or they may activate anti-inflammatory and innate immune defences as a result of the original insult. These possibilities may be addressed in future studies and by comparison of the proteomes from CFS subjects with different durations and patterns of illness.
• This research developed an objective model to predict CFS status based only on the proteomic detection of the 5 proteins, keratin 16, ∝-2-macroglobulin, orosomucoid 2, autotaxin, and pigment epithelium-derived factor. This is the first predictive model of CFS to be based on objective data and legitimise the hypothesis that a common CNS pathophysiology was present in the CFS spectrum of illnesses. Individual proteins or their patterns of detection may prove valuable biomarkers in diagnostic assays. These assays may gauge disease severity, dynamic variations in symptomology, and longitudinal alterations with age or treatments.
• From these results the researchers propose the hypothesis that CFS may be a nonlethal, protein-misfolding, cerbrovascular amyloidosis-like syndrome.
• Given the continued controversy over whether CFS and its allied syndromes are legitimate medical conditions, the researchers’ state that their proteomic model provides initial objective evidence for the legitimacy of CFS as a distinct neurological disease.


Spinal Fluid Abnormalities in Patients with CFS

Research by Ben Natelson et al (2005 – USA)19

In parallel work these researchers have reported data suggesting that some patients with CFS have neurological dysfunction. Specifically those patients with a sudden illness onset, as well as those with no history of psychiatric diagnosis had more evidence of cognitive dysfunction than other CFS groups. Also showed that CFS patients with no history of psychiatric diagnosis had more abnormalities on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and that those patients with MRI abnormalities had poorer physical function. Relevant linked papers to these observations can be found in this paper.

• Outcome measures in this research were the white blood cell count, protein concentration in spinal fluid, and cytokines detectable in spinal fluid.
• The study found significantly more CFS patients had elevations in either protein levels, or number of cells, than healthy controls (30 versus 0%)
• Patients with abnormal fluid had a lower rate of having co-morbid depression.
• 11 cytokines were detectable in the spinal fluid
• Cytokine – levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor were lower in patients than controls
• Levels of interleukin-8 (IL-8) were higher in patients with sudden, flu-like onset, than gradual onset or in controls
• IL-10 levels were higher in patients with abnormal spinal fluids than normal fluids or controls
• The researchers feel the results support 2 hypotheses
• 1 – That some CFS patients have a neurological abnormality that may contribute to the clinical picture of the illness and
• 2 – Immune dysregulation within the central nervous system may be involved in this process.
• A recent study showing elevations of IL-8 and IL-10 levels during chemotherapy-induced symptoms resembling some of those seen in CFS provides additional evidence for this hypothesis. (see ref in this paper)


Objective evidence of cognitive complaints in CFS: A BOLD fMRI study of verbal working memory

Research by Lange et al (2005 – USA)20

Using a series of 2 Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to compare BOLD signal changes between controls and individuals with CFS who had difficulties in complex auditory information processing (study 1) and those who did not (study 2) in response to performance on a simple auditory monitoring and a complex auditory information processing task (mPASAT).

Researchers hypothesised that under conditions of cognitive challenge individuals with CFS with this problem will utilise frontal and parietal brain regions to a greater extent than controls. Blocked design fMRI paradigms was used in both studies and statistical parametric mapping (SPM99).

Findings showed that individuals with CFS are able to process challenging auditory information as accurately as controls but that they utilise more extensive regions of the network associated with the verbal WM system. They appear to have to exert greater effort to process auditory information as effectively as similar healthy adults. These findings provide objective evidence for the subjective experience of cognitive difficulties in individuals with CFS.


Research in Function of Hypothalmic-Adrenal-Pituitary Axis

This has long been felt to play a major part in ME/CFS - to date research has found some changes in this area, but further research is needed.

HPA Axis Reactivity in CFS and Health under Psychological, Physiological and Pharmacological Stimulation

Research by: Gaab et al (2002 – USA)21 This study found:-

• Significantly lower adrenocorticotrophin hormone (ACTH) responses in the psycho-social stress test and the exercise test
• Significantly lower ACTH responses in the Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT), with no differences in plasma total cortisol responses.
• Salivary-free cortisol responses did not differ between the groups in the psycho-social stress test and the exercise test BUT were significantly higher for the CFS patients in the ITT.
• In all tests CFS patients had significantly reduced baseline ACTH levels

The researchers concluded that these results suggested that CFS patients are capable of mounting a sufficient cortisol response under different types of stress, but that on a central level subtle dysregulations of the HPA axis exist.


24-hour Pituitary and Adrenal Hormone Profiles in CFS

Research by: A Di Giorgio, Tony Cleare et al (2005 – Italy)22

Disturbances of neuroendocrine function particularly the HPA axis have been implicated in the pathophysiology of CFS. This study aimed to measure the blood levels of pituitary and adrenal hormones over a whole 24-hour period, to assess 24-hour pituitary and adrenal function.

15 medication-free CFS patients, without co-morbid psychiatric disorder, and 10 healthy controls were tested. Blood samples were collected over a 24-hour period – on an hourly basis during daytime hours (10am-10pm) and every 15 minutes thereafter (10pm-10am). The blood samples were assayed for cortisol, corticotropin (ACTH), growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL).

Results: There was a reduced mean ACTH secretion in patients with CFS over the whole monitoring period, and a group-by-time interaction, suggesting a differential pattern of ACTH release. Analysis showed reduced ACTH levels in CFS during the 8am to 10 am period. No differences were found in the cortisol circadian rhythm parameters, but the ACTH rhythm did differ, patients with CFS showing an earlier acrophase. There were no significant abnormalities in the levels of cortisol, GH and PRL.

Conclusion: Patients with CFS demonstrated subtle alterations in HPA axis activity characterised by reduced ACTH over a full circadian cycle and reduced levels during the usual morning physiological peak ACTH secretion. This provides further evidence of subtle dysregulation of the HPA axis in CFS. Whether this dysregulation is a primary feature of the illness or instead represents a biological effect secondary to having the illness itself remains unclear.


Diurnal Patterns of Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone Output in CFS

Research: Tony Cleare, Simon Wessley et al (2005 –UK)23

Study to obtain a naturalistic measure of diurnal HPA axis output unaffected by medication of comorbid psychiatric disorder. Cortisol and Cortisone levels were measured in saliva samples collected from 0600 to 2100 in 3 hourly intervals in patients and controls.

The study showed mean cortisol and cortisone concentrations were significantly lower in CFS patients than controls across the whole day, as were levels at each individual time point except 2100. Significant diurnal rhythm of cortisol and cortisone that was not phase-shifted in CFS compared to controls. Conclusion:
• This study provides further evidence for reduced basal HPA axis function in at least some patients with CFS
• Shows for the first time that salivary cortisone is also reduced in CFS and has a diurnal rhythm similar to that of cortisol.
• Also demonstrated cortisol/cortisone ratio remains unchanged in CFS, suggesting that increased conversion of cortisol to cortisone cannot account for the observed lowering of salivary cortisol.


Disturbed Adrenal Function in Adolescents with CFS

Researchers; Segal, Hindmarsh & Viner (2005 – UCL London)24

This study tested adrenal function in children and adolescents by testing serum cortisol concentrations at 5 minute intervals from 10-45 minutes. Low dose (500ng/m2) synacthen tests (LDST).

• Patients with CFS had significantly lower mean cortisol levels during the LDST, lower peak cortisol, reduced cortisol area under curve (AUC) and longer time to peak cortisol.
• Abnormalities were seen in both sexes but were more pronounced in females.
• Unstimulated adrenal androgen and 17 hydroxyprogesterone concentrations were normal.

Conclusion: Adolescents with CFS have subtle alterations in adrenal function suggesting a reduction in central stimulation of the adrenal glands. The more pronounced effects in females may reflect differential central effects of stress on HPA axis regulation between the sexes.




Brain 5-HT1A Receptor Binding in CFS measured using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and (11C)WAY-100635

Researchers: Tony Cleare et al (2005 – London)25

This study assessed brain 5-HT1A receptor binding potential directly using PET and specific redioligand (11C)WAY-100635. 10 patients and 10 controls – medication free and did not have comorbid psychiatric illness.

There was a widespread reduction in 5-HT1A receptor binding potential in CFS relative to controls. This was particularly marked in the hippocampus bilaterally, where a 23% reduction was observed. Researchers concluded that there is evidence of decreased 5-HT1A receptor number or affinity in CFS, this may be a primary feature of CFS, related to underlying pathophysiology, or a finding secondary to other processes.

Pituitary-Adrenal Function in People with Fatiguing Illness - At present an eminent and well-respected US researcher Ben Natelson has an ongoing study to evaluate and compare the function of the HPA axis between Gulf War Veterans and CFS patients.

Adrenal Function - The Adrenal Stress Profile Test (ASP) looks at cortisol and DHEA levels over 24 hours by sampling salivary samples. Cleare et al – Lancet 1999 - Low cortisol levels were found and a course of low dose hydrocortisone was prescribed. This resulted in ‘significant reduction in self-rated fatigue and disability in patients with CFS’. Researchers felt this shed interesting light on the possible role of low cortisol levels in the disease processes involved in CFS. But CAUTION is required as participants’ baseline cortisol levels could not predict their response to hydrocortisone treatment and participants appeared to have baseline cortisol levels within the normal reference range. McKenzie et al - 1998 – USA – followed a similar research study, giving small daily doses of hydrocortisone (20-30 mg at 8am and 5 mg at 2 pm for 12 weeks). This induced mild suppression of the HPA axis and resulted in only slight symptomatic improvement, the authors appropriately concluded that their regimen, or comparable doses of other glucocorticoids, should not be used for prolonged treatment of CFS.


GENE EXPRESSION IN ME/CFS PATIENTS

Association between CFS and the Corticosteroid-Binding Gene ALA SER224 Polymorphism

Researchers: Torpy et al (2004 – Queensland Australia) – Abstract26

CFS is characterised by idiopathic fatigue with post-exertional exacerbation and many other symptoms. A trend to relative hypocortilism is described in CFS. Twin and family studies indicate a substantial genetic aetiological component to CFS Recently severe corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) gene mutations have been associated with CFS in isolated kindreds. Human leukocyte elastase, an enzyme important in CBG catabolism at inflammatory sites, is reported to be elevated in CFS.
The researchers hypothesised that CBG gene polymorphisms may act as a genetic risk factor for CFS. 248 patients and controls were recruited. Sequencing and restriction enzyme testing of the CBG gene coding region allowed detection of severe CBG gene mutations and a common exon 3 polymorphism. Plasma CBG levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. Total and free cortisol levels were ascertained in single samples between 8-10 am. A trend toward a preponderance of serine224 homozygosity among the CFS patients was noted.

Homozygosity for the serine allele of the CBG gene may predispose to CFS, perhaps due to an effect on HPA axis function related to altered CBG-cortisol transport function or immune-cortisol interactions.


Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells from Patients with CFS

Research by Jonathan Kerr et al (2005 – UK).27

The objective of the research was to test the hypothesis that there are reproducible abnormalities of gene expression in patients with CFS compared to normal healthy controls and to enable them to gain further insight into the pathogenesis of this disease.

Researchers selected 25 patients with CFS – these included those, whose disease was severe and necessitated bed rest for much of the day, and those whose disease was of a milder nature, and 25 blood donors for healthy controls. Researchers studied gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using a microarray, and using Taqman real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to confirm those genes being differentially expressed between the groups.
Researchers found:-
• Microarray analysis – this analysis identified 35 genes that showed significantly different expression in patients with CFS compared to normal controls
• The degree of expression of these 35 genes revealed a cluster of 18 subjects, 17 CFS patients and 1 control
• Taqman real time PCR – was used to confirm the importance of genes identified using microarray analysis
• Significantly different expression was confirmed for 16 of 33 genes.
• This method revealed upregulation of 15 genes and downregulation of one gene
• In general the standard deviation of these 16 genes in normal persons is very much lower than in patients with CFS, except for IL-10RA. A full list of the 16 genes can be found in the paper.
• Although these genes do not fit neatly into known metabolic pathways, several broad themes are apparent – T-cell activation and neuronal and mitochondrial function.
• T-cell activation is suggested by upregulation of CD2BP2 and downregulation of IL-10RA – in addition PRKCL1 plays a role in immune response.
• Genes that are active in the immune response have been found to be differentially expressed in all studies of gene expression in CFS, as have genes that are crucial for T-cell activation.
• These findings are consistent with previous studies (see paper) showing that patients with CFS have evidence of immune activation, such as increased numbers of activated T cells and cytotoxic T cells, and raised circulating cytokine concentrations.
• The upregulation of EIF4G1 identified in this study may represent a common host response to persistent infection with several different viruses. The vulnerability of this gene may have particular importance in the development of CFS after an acute virus infection.

The researchers concluded that there was a differential expression of 16 genes in CFS patients compared to normal controls. The involvement of genes from several disparate pathways suggests a complex pathogenesis involving T-cell activation and abnormalities of neuronal and mitochondrial function, and suggests possible molecular bases for the recognised contributions of organophosphate exposure and virus infection.

This research was funded by the CFS Research Foundation.
NB: This research is currently being extended to a much larger population (involving 1000 patients) and results are looking very similar to the initial smaller study. This study is reaching its conclusion and should be reported shortly.


Association of CFS with human leucocyte antigen class II alleles

Research by Jonathon Kerr, Tony Cleare, Simon Wessley et al (2005 – UK)28

This research studied the role of HLA class II antigens in CFS. 49 patients diagnosed with CFS at Kings College, London and 102 normal individuals were studied. 25 of the 49 CFS patients were not depressed and 24 were depressed. Patients and controls were typed for HLA class II alleles by PCR using sequence specific primers, with DNA extracted from whole blood. Research found:-
• There were no HLA class II associations with depression versus non-depression within the CFS group
• Results suggest that HLA-DQA1*O1 may be the primary association with CFS. This allele has been associated with few disease conditions, although associations have been found with tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome, and hyper-response to measles vaccine.
• There was also a marginal increase in the expression of HLA-DQB1*O6
• Additional sub-typing of both of these alleles will be necessary to identify which particular sub-types are important.
• These results suggest an association between CFS and the HLA class II region, primarily the HLA-DQA1*O1 allele.
• Because of the strong linkage disequilibrium between genes in this region, an association with other genes within the HLA locus cannot be ruled out. Further studies are needed.

In conclusion, the current available data on immune cell and cytokine deregulation in CFS are consistent with an immunomodulatory role for the HLA system in this disease.

Dr John Gow and colleagues at the University Department of Neurology in Glasgow has been doing a similar study to seek a ‘biomarker’ for the illness ME/CFS using novel microarray technology and researching the gene expression of ME/CFS patients against healthy controls. Dr Gow’s team has suggested alterations to genes controlling the metabolism of prostaglandin and those regulation-specific immune cells. This could lead to a specific ‘gene signature’ for particular proteins being revealed. It is felt once the microarray test has been developed and in regular use, the cost for patients being tested could be as little as £50.
This work has been supported by MERGE who will present the full report. But it further reinforces the work of Dr Jonathon Kerr et al.


Integration of Gene Expression, Clinical, and Epidemiological Data to Characterise CFS

Research by Suzanne Vernon, Toni Whistler et al (2003 – USA)29

This study used the integration of peripheral blood gene expression results with epidemiological and clinical data to determine whether CFS is a single or heterogenous illness. Results of such research they feel may help to identify CFS sub-groups. Deciphering the physiological basis for CFS would go far in accessing the heterogenity of the illness and would advance diagnosis and treatment.

Research found:-
• CFS patients were grouped with respect to variables and the mean difference between their gene expression values then compared
• This approach identified 117 genes that were differentially expressed when they were grouped by on-set type (gradual or sudden).
• For this reason only 117 genes identified by two-class analysis were examined further.
• The majority of subjects clustered according to onset type and the genes fell into two distinct clusters.
• Expression of 19 of the 117 genes was increased, in the gradual compared to the sudden onset group, while the expression of the remaining 98 genes was decreased.
• Fig 3 in the paper summarises the functional classification of all 117 differentially expressed genes with respect to cluster group
• 24 genes are associated with metabolism – 20 of which were down-regulated in the gradual onset cluster – mainly involved with regulation of glycolysis, glucose and disaccharide metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, amino acid biosynthesis, and purine or pyrimidine metabolism.
• Oxidative phosphorylation and the ATP generated by this process are the major source of energy for the normal function of most cells in the body.
• Of the 19 up-regulated genes, some were involved in metabolism, but were not statistically significant.
• The 7 genes involved in RNA processing were, however, statistically significant in this group
• Many RNA processing proteins are central to the effective action of the antiviral interferon
• Alterations in effective anti-microbial responses may also explain the chronic fatigue state
• The researchers identify that physiological stressors such as infection, trauma and toxins can trigger the development of CFS in susceptible individuals.
• In most studies subjects have been ill for many years, making it difficult to detect initial disease triggers, as causal factors may be difficult to detect or no longer present. In addition, in many diseases, factors associated with disability are distinct from causative factors. Biomarkers have the potential to give clues to disease aetiology as well as mode of action.
• Different gene expression profiles among those who describe a difference in illness onset imply distinct aetiological or triggering events, and shows that these differences are maintained well into the disease process.
In conclusion this research should advance the cause for defining CFS at a molecular level, resulting in diagnosing and possible identification of causative agents, and the genes may serve as a platform to further explore relevant mechanisms of pathogenesis and improve the understanding of the molecular basis of CFS.


Exercise Responsive Genes Measured in Peripheral Blood of Women with CFS and Matched Control Subjects

Researchers Suzanne Vernon, Toni Whistler et al (2005 – USA)30

Aim: To search for markers of CFS-associated post-exertional fatigue, measuring peripheral blood gene expression profiles of women with CFS and matched controls before and after exercise.
Research found:
• Exercise response genes were evaluated before and after exercise and 21 genes were identified as being differentially expressed
• 16 of the 21 genes could be categorised in the Gene Ontology (GO) of biological process and 15 in molecular function.
• 5 of the 21 genes were involved in the biological process of transport (both vesicle-mediated and protein transport)
• Since these 21 genes reflect a healthy subject’s peripheral blood gene expression response to exercise challenge, this could be compared to the CFS subjects.
• The response of 10 of the 21 genes was similar in both groups
• For the other 11 genes the magnitude of exercise change was considerably smaller in CFS subjects
• With regard to the GO categories of the 21 genes, 10 genes were associated with binding and 8 with metabolism
• Healthy Controls: Exercise in healthy untrained people induces changes in homeostasis in 1 to 4 hours and a return to basal levels in 24 hours as measured in muscle. Analysis of peripheral blood gene expression confirmed this observation since the majority of the gene expression levels were the same before and 24 hours after the exercise challenge. Many of the 21 exercise-induced, differentially expressed genes in control subjects were characterised by GOs that reflect a diverse set of molecular functions necessary for cell function and viability.
• CFS Patients: In comparison, 11 of the genes were unchanged in CFS subjects before and after exercise, with 5 being classified in a transport-related ontology. Because this difference in gene expression is so dramatic, it implicates a fundamental perturbation in the biochemical activity of lymphocyte and monocyte peripheral blood fractions from CFS subjects compared with the controls that does not affect classical immunological markers (ie CD45) that have been shown to be unaffected in CFS patients. Rather, low expression of these genes may have subtle effects on immune function. Immune dysfunction has been inconsistently implicated in CFS pathogenesis.
• The GO categories with significant difference after exercise were those pertaining to ion transporter activity (87 genes applied to this category in comparison of CFS and controls following exercise) and ATPase activity coupled to transmembrane movement (42 genes).
• It is evident that ion transport and ion channel activity segregate cases from controls and that exercise seems to intensify these differences.
• Several other illnesses with fluctuating fatigue have abnormal ion channels. These include genetically determined channelopathies and acquired conditions such as neuromyotonia, myasthenic syndromes, multiple sclerosis, and polyneuropathies.
• The other transmembrane function difference between CFS patients and controls, include transducer activity through receptor binding/activity. Signal transduction of transmembrane receptors occurs by a number of mechanisms, including structural changes, ion channels, and changes of transmembrane potentials. The G-protein-coupled receptors play an important role in the membrane trafficking machinery.

The most obvious exercise-induced changes in CFS cases pertain to gene regulation at the point of chromatin structure – whether these changes reflect the differences seen in the mRNA transcripts relating to membrane trafficking differences between cases and controls has not yet been determined. One interesting correlate of this study was the finding that the complement pathway, and complement activation was identified as an ontology, showing significant differences between CFS and controls subjects after exercise.
Differential-display PCR of Peripheral Blood for Biomarker Discovery in CFS

Researchers: Steinau, Unger, Vernon et al (2004 – CDC – USA) – Abstract31

Used differential-display PCR of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to search for candidate biomarkers for CFS. PBMCs were collected from patients and controls before and 24 hours after exercise. RNA expression profiles were generated using 46 primer combinations, and the similarity between individuals was striking. Differentially expressed bands were excised, reamplified, and sequenced, yielding 95 nonredundant sequences.
• Of these 38 matched to genes of unknown function
• 7 had no similarity to any database entry
• 86% of the differences between the 2 subjects were present at baseline
• Differential expression of 10 genes was verified by real-time reverse transcription PCR
• 5 genes – cystatin F, MHC class II, platelet factor 4, fetal brain expressed tag, and perforin – were down-regulated in CFS patients
• The remaining 5 genes – cathepsin B, DNA polymerase epsilon4, novel EST PBMC191MSt, heparanase precursor, and ORF2/L1 element – were up-regulated in CFS patients
• Many of these genes have known functions in defence and immunity, thus supporting prior suggestions of immune dysregulation in the pathogenesis of CFS

PCR is a powerful tool for identification of candidate biomarkers and the real-time reverse-transcript PCR assays developed for assay of these biomarkers will facilitate high-throughput testing.


Identification of Novel Expressed Sequences, Up-regulated in the Leucocytes of CFS Patients

Researhers: Powell et al (2003 – UK) – Abstract32

12 short expressed sequence tags were identified that were over-expressed in lymphocytes from CFS patients -–2 of these correspond to cathepsin C and MAIL 1 – genes known to be up-regulated in activated lymphocytes. The researchers conclude their research adds weight to the idea that CFS is a disease characterised by subtle changes in the immune system.


Association between Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism and CFS

Researchers: Narita et al (2003 – Japan) Abstract33

Interaction between HPA axis and serotonergic system is thought to be disrupted in CFS patients. Examined a serotonin transporter (5-HTT) gene promoter polymorphism, which affects the transcriptional efficiency of 5-HTT by using PCR amplification of the blood genomic DNA.

A significant increase of longer (L and XL) alleic variants was found in CFS patients compared to controls, both by genotype-wise and allele-wise analyses. Attenuated concentration of extracellular serotonin due to longer variants may cause higher susceptibility to CFS.


A Twin Study of the Etiology of Prolonged Fatigue and Immune Activation

Researchers: Hickie, Lloyd et al (2001 – Australia)34

NB: this is a paper which may be presented to the Group, and whilst it may highlight some points, as we will here, it must be remembered that this is a paper looking into Prolonged Fatigue States (PFS), of which they think CFS may be related in some way, because of the fatigue element of the illness. Being psychiatrists they are looking more at the activation of the immune state in relation to the psychological state,

They looked at 79 pairs of monozygotic twins (MZ) and 45 pairs of dizygotic twins (DZ). Multivariate genetic and environmental models were fitted to explore the patterns of covariation between aetiological factors. They found:
• For fatigue, the MZ correlation was more than double the DZ correlation, indicating strong genetic control of familial aggregation
• By contrast, for in vitro immune activation measures MZ and DZ were simialr, indicating the aetiological role of shared environments
• Relevant aetiological factors included:
• (1) A common genetic factor accounting for 48% of the variance for fatigue, which also accounted for 4%, 6% and 8% reductions in immune activation;
• (2) specific genetic factors for each of the in vitro immune measures; a shared environment factor influencing the 3 immune activation measures;
• (3) Most interestingly environmental influences which increased fatigue but also increased markers of immune activation;
They conclude that PFS that are associated with in vitro measures of immune activation are most likely to be the consequence of current environmental factors rather than genetic factors. Environmental factors could include physical agents such as infection and/or psychological stress.

However they end the paper ‘the actual clinical pheno-type will ultimately depend on the interplay between these various specific environmental and genetic factors. Prospective studies of specific infective agents provide an important methodology for further clarification of the aetiological contribution of each agent, while alternative genetic methods may lead to clarification of the specific genetic factors involved in the genesis of some other types of prolonged fatigue states, notably CFS.


Non-responder gene

Been unable to get a research paper on this. It was in the Guardian newspaper on 14 January 2006 – Wellbeing section. Research by Pennington Biomedical Research Centre at Louisiana State University suggests that some people simply do not respond to exercise. More than 700 people were put through a challenging 20 week endurance training programme and, while markers of aerobic fitness improved by 17% on average, some people showed no improvement at all, while others improved by as much as 40%. ‘The inheritability of responsiveness to exercise is at least as great as body weight, blood pressure and cholesterol levels’ says Claude Bouchard, on eof the researchers. He estimates that about 10% of the population will never get any fitter through exercise – neither losing weight, nor improving strength, speed or stamina.

This may be totally irrelevant, but it may be there is such a gene, and this is one of a number of genes, which is further compromised and affecting the wellbeing of people with ME/CFS.


OXIDATIVE STRESS

Oxidative stress has been defined as a disturbance to the equilibrium status of prooxidant and antioxidant systems in favour of prooxidation. The term oxidative stress is used to describe a number of chemical reactions involved in the production of free radicals and other reactive molecules that are potentially able to induce cellular injury.


Plasma Isoprostanes and Other Markers of Oxidative Stress in CFS

Researchers: Dr Gwen Kennedy (2003 – Dundee) – MERGE35

This study investigated lipid peroxidation in CFS examining isoprostanes. The following markers of oxidative stress were determined from a blood sample oxidised low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, plasma isoprostanes, in conjunction with a measure of red blood cell GSH


The study found that people with CFS had:
• Significantly increased levels of isoprostanes (p<0.005) and oxLDL (p=0.02), indicating a direct measure of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress.
• People with CFS also had lower levels of the antioxidant GSH (p=0.05) and lower levels of ‘good cholesterol’ HDL (p<0.001).

In conclusion the researchers state this new data provides further evidence of dysfunction to oxidative pathways in CFS. The finding of high levels of isoprostanes in people with CFS is particularly important given this measure’s sensitivity, reliability and correlation with other measures of lipid peroxidation in vivo. Furthermore, isoprostanes may not only be markers of oxidative injury, but may in fact mediate the effects of free radicals and reactive oxygen species.


Oxidative Stress Levels are Raised in CFS and are Associated with Clinical Symptoms

Researchers: Gwen Kennedy, Vance Spence et al (2005 – Dundee) MERGE36
Please read this paper

This study investigated for the first time levels of 8-iso-prostaglandin-F2a-isoprostanes alongside other plasma markers of oxidative stress and antioxidant status in well-defined CFS patients and controls, and to relate these levels to reported clinical symptoms of CFS. The CFS patients were divided into 2 groups – Group 1 had previously defined cardiovascular (CV) risk factors of obesity and hypertension and Group2 were normotensive and non-obese.

While free radicals may generate tissue oxidative injury it is also evident that other oxidative by-products, especially peroxidised lipids such as 8-iso-prostaglandin F2∝ may be even more pivotal in the pathological process, and is a member of the F2-isoprostane family and can exert potent biological activity, such as platelet activation, and act as a powerful vasoconstrictor of the peripheral vasculature. Such biological effects may be instrumental in the development of some of the vascular features that characterise patients with CFS.

A further indication of the in vivo consequences of increased lipid peroxidation would be;
• higher levels of oxidised low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL), which is toxic to the endothelium
• accompanied by low levels of high density lipoproteins (HDL) which are associated with the development of atherosclerosis
• The antiviral properties of HDL, low levels may reflect impaired antiviral defence pathways that are characteristic of this patient population.
• OxLDL: has the ability to stimulate genes associated with antioxidant responses such as the gene transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB).
• Free radicals, certain viruses, and inflammatory cytokines can also activate NF-kB and there is recent evidence pointing to an upregulation of this in CFS patients.
• Antioxidant capacity, represented by Glutathione levels, is significantly reduced in Group1 patients

Results:
• CFS patients had significantly increased levels of isoprostanes (Group1 – P = 0.007 and Group2 – P = 0.03) and oxidised low-density lipoproteins (Group2 P = 0.02) indicative of a free readical attack on lipids.
• CFS patients also had significantly lower high-density lipoproteins (Group1 P = 0.011 and Group2 P = 0.005)
• CFS symptoms correlated with isoprostanes levels, but only in Group2 – low cardiovascular risk CFS patients.
• Isoprostanes correlated with: total symptom score P = 0.005; joint pain P = 0.002; post-exertional malaise P = 0.027

It could be suggested that CFS is an inflammatory condition with many patients in a prooxidant state and this could explain many of the pathological manifestations that underlie the illness. On balance CFS patients have a lipid profile and oxidant biology that is consistent with cardiovascular risk and the presence of high levels of F2 isoprostanes may explain some of the symptoms of the disease. Supplementation with specific antioxidant medications might help to ameliorate symptoms and any potential cardiovascular complications of the illness.


CFS: Assessment of Increased Oxidative Stress and Altered Muscle Excitability in Response to Incremental Exercise

Researchers: Jammes et al (2005 – France)37

Patients and controls performed an incremental cycling exercise until exhaustion. Researchers measured oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (HR), systemic blood pressure, percutaneous O2 saturation (SpO2), M-wave recording from vastus lateralis and venous blood sampling allowing measurements of pH (pHv), PO2 (PvO2), lactic acid (LA) and 3 markers of the oxidative stress – thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances(TBARS), reduced glutathione, GSH, and ascorbic acid (RAA). They found:

• Resting PvO2 level, before exercise, was higher in resting CFS patients, suggesting a reduced baseline oxygen uptake by tissues.
• In CFS patients the exercise-induced oxidative stress occurred sooner, that is at the maximal work-rate, lasted more, and there was a significant enhanced maximal post-exercise decrease in RAA level.
• This accentuated post-exercise oxidative stress was associated with marked alterations in muscle excitability (lengthened M-wave duration) – these M-wave changes were totally absent in the control subjects.
• Changes in PCr and intramuscular pH occurred more rapidly in CFS patients suggesting an acceleration of glycolysis.
• Oxidative stress is highly expressed in skeletal muscles because their antioxidant defences are poor.
• Early changes in blood redox status in CFS patients during the exercise bout have a real significance. These differences prevail for the changes in plasma RAA concentration.
• In humans RAA is the only endogenous antioxidant that completely protects the plasma lipids from any detectable damage induced by the formation of hydroperoxide radicals (HRad), trapping all HRad in the aqueous phase before they can reach the plasma lipids.
• In CFS patients the accentuated and prolonged post-exercise oxidative stress may be responsible for muscle membrane alterations eg the formation of lipid hydroperoxides, with the consequence of the impaired membrane excitability.

An increased level of free radical damage in CFS may be a contributor to the underlying functional defects and symptom presentation.


Biochemical Evidence for a Novel Low Molecular Weight 2-5A-Dependent RNase L in CFS

Researchers: Robert Suhadolnik, Daniel Perterson et al (1997 –USA)38

The full paper for this research can be found in the BRAME newsletter ME TODAY – ISSUE 6 – December 1997.

This research identified a possible biological marker for CFS. The study shows a defective RNase L enzyme in CFS patients. This newly discovered enzyme, which has a lower molecular weight than the normal enzyme found in the viral pathway in which this protein is active, may explain common observations in patients with CFS.
• An inability to control common viruses; like Epstein-Barr (EBV) and Human Herpes Virus 6 (HHV6)
• An inability to maintain cellular energy
• The viral pathway known as the 2-5A synthestase/RNase L antiviral pathway may control both of these processes.
• When all components of this viral pathway are working normally, the body can effectively control virus infection. This research has shown that several components of this antiviral pathway are not functioning properly in CFS patients.
• Specifically, the antiviral pathway is upregulated (or overactive) in people with CFS
• While all CFS patients tested positive for the low molecular weight enzyme, some also had the normal RNase L. However extracts from the most severely disabled CFS patients in this study contained only the low molecular weight enzyme
Researchers feel that this new enzyme may not function as well as the normal RNase L found in healthy people, and it may explain why CFS patients’ bodies have a hard time maintaining the energy necessary for cellular growth.

It is interesting to note that the researchers found that RNase L was overactive, unlike anything seen before in studies on RNase L activity in other people with AIDS, MS, lupus, human T-cell leukaemia and kidney cancer.

To determine why RNase L in CFS patients is overactive, a new two part technology was developed, using ultra-violet light and an antibody to human RNase L . Measuring the activity of RNase L, the researchers were surprised to discover a new smaller form of RNase L in all people with CFS. They also felt their research suggested that the presence and activity of the new form RNase L correlates with the severity of clinical symptoms in people with CFS.


Chronic Fatigue syndrome: a risk factor for osteopenia?39

Researchers: Nijs J, De Meirleir K, Englebienne P, McGregor N.

Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium. Jo.Nijs@vub.ac.be

No data documenting a possible depletion of bone mineral density in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are currently available. However, recent pathophysiological observations in CFS patients may have deleterious consequences on bone density. Firstly, the deregulation of the 2,5A synthetase RNase L antiviral pathway and its associated channelopathy, implicates increased demands for calcium and consequent increased calcium-re-absorption from the skeletal system. Secondly, Mycoplasma fermentans which has been frequently associated with CFS, produces a lipopeptide, named 2-kDa macrophage-activating lipopeptide (MALP-2), which stimulates macrophages. MALP-2 has been shown to enhance bone resorption in a dose-dependent manner, at least in part by stimulating the formation of prostaglandins. Thirdly, decreased levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) have been reported in CFS-patients. IGF-I is critical to the proliferation of osteoblasts. Consequently, depleted levels of IGF-I may shift the balance between osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity towards bone resorption.


INFECTIOUS AGENTS

Dr Betty Dowsett and Dr John Richardson did a great deal of work regarding enteroviruses, and they may well play a great part in the disease process of ME/CFS. Dr Garth Nicholson with Mycoplasma. Viruses such as Epstein-Barr, Cytomegalovirus, HHV6, Parvovirus are all felt to implicated in underlying or triggering the initial infection in the body.

A severe flu-like illness that occurs in most cases of CFS followed by persistent illness and fatigue suggests an infectious aetiolgy that triggers and possibly perpetuates this syndrome.

In small sub-sets of patients Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Parvovirus B19 (PB19), brucella, toxoplasma, Coxiella burnetti,and Chalmydia pneumoniae have been reported to cause prolonged fatigue, fevers and many other symptoms of CFS.

Other viruses have been investigated as the causative agents of CFS: Human Herpes Virus 6 (HHV6), Group B Coxsackieviruses (CVB), Human T-Cell Leukaemia virus II-like virus, Spumavirus, Hepatitis C virus , Human Lentivirus and Herpes Virus 7, although consistent and supportive evidence is still lacking.

Kormaroff et al view CFS as an immunological disturbance that allows the reactivation of latent and persistent infectious agents, particularly viruses in the host. Levy believes that although no viral agents have been found consistently in patients with CFS, an infectious organism may be the cause fo this condition and may continue to be present in the individual.

Recent data suggests that CFS is a heterogenous disease, and can have several potentially treatable infectious aetiologies.

The Role of Enteroviruses in CFS

Researcher: JKS Chia (2005 –USA)40 This is a paper that should be read in full

Several investigators have used DNA/RNA hybridisation or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence of enteroviral RNA in tissues of patients with CFS.

• The results of antiviral treatment provided supportive evidence for the pathogenic role of RNA in patients with CFS
• To date 8 of 14 severely ill patients with detectable enteroviral RNA in their peripheral blood leucocytes have responded to the combination of interferon α and δ. But relapse still occurred after heavy exertion a few months later.
• Patients with CFS and the presence of viral RNA in peripheral blood leucocytes or in tissues, but without true viraemia, have debilitating symptoms, the severity of the symptoms correlated with the frequency of finding enteroviral RNA in the peripheral blood leucocytes
• In most patients with CFS, the cyclic nature of low grade febrile illness and severe exacerbations after physical activity would be consistent with a cyclical pattern in the viral replicative activity.
• It is possible that viral RNA found inside cells, in a stable double stranded form, can dissociate and replicate using viral RNA replicase; some of the positive strands, although restricted in replication, are translated to viral proteins during active metabolic states (for instance, exercise) which perpetuates the immunological response, including but not limited to synthesis of specific neutralising antibody.
• Among other immunostimulatory effects, double stranded RNA is a potent inducer of interferon synthesis, which activates intracellular RNase L with resultant degradation of excessive single stranded RNA. The finding of a higher level of RNase L activity in mononuclear cells of CFS patients is consistent with this paradigm.
• Ironically the continuing inflammatory response towards persistently infected cells/tissues to halt viral infection may be partially responsible for the difficulty in finding viral genomes in these patients, and may also be responsible for the symptoms.
• Despite an ongoing immune response, these viral RNA infected cells are not eradicated. It is possible that viruses hide in long living, immunologically privileged cells, including but not limited to macrophages, muscles, myocardial cells and neurones.
• Persistent infection of B cells and monocytes/macrophages, the cells initially responsible for the uptake and transport of virus has been well described for other intracellular pathogens.
• Recently the researchers have found enteroviral RNA in the bone marrow samples of 2 patietns with CFS and cyclic neutropaenia, suggesting that stem cells in the bone marrow could be a source of ongoing viral infection.






Enterovirus Related Metabolic Myopathy: a Postviral Fatigue Syndrome

Researchers: Lane et al (2002 –London)41 - Read this paper

This research was to detect and characterise enterovirus RNA in skeletal from patients with CFS and compared efficiency of muscle energy metabolism in enterovirus positive and negative CFS patients.

Enteroviruses have been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Recent application of the reverse transcription, nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-NPCR), including nucleotide sequencing of PCR products, has unequivocally demonstrated coxsackie B3-like RNA in endomyocardial biopsies from such cases. Although PCR studies on CFS patients have been conflicting.

• Some CFS patients have been shown to have abnormal lactate responses to exercise in the subanaerobic threshold exercise test (SATET). This could not be explained on the basis of deconditioning of muscle tissue, and subsequently these researchers, and others, showed that some CFS patients have abnormal muscle energy metabolism on phosphorous NMR spectroscopy.

• Fulcher and White compared exercise characteristics and muscle strength in CFS patients, and patients with clinical depression. CFS patients were weaker in tests on quadriceps strength.

• This study describes the detection and characterisation of enteroviral RNA in muscle from CFS patients and examine the relation between the presence of enterovirus and lactate responses to exercise.

• This research showed that the presence of enterovirus sequences in muscle is not typical of the normal population.

• An abnormal lactate response toe exercise was present 9 times more commonly in CFS patients with enterovirus sequences in muscle than in enterovrius negative cases

• Mutations at other sites in the viral RNA might determine viral persistence and effects on mitochondrial function.

This research shows that some CFS patients have abnormal muscle energy metabolism which is related statistically to the presence of enterovirus sequences in muscle, and that the viruses involved are predominantly coxsackie B-like. The data here supports the concept of a true post viral fatigue syndrome following enterovirus infection.


Pathogenesis of Parvovirus B19 Infection: Host Gene Variability, and Possible Means and Effects of Virus Persistence.

Researcher: Jonathan Kerr42

Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK. jkerr@sgul.ac.uk

Since conducting follow-up studies of patients with acute symptomatic parvovirus B19 infection which showed that a significant proportion of patients develop prolonged arthritis and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), the researchers have become interested in the mechanisms of this phenomenon. Showed that these cases have:
• High levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in their circulation and that this correlates with the symptoms. However, the underlying mechanisms were not apparent, and various approaches to begin studying this phenomenon have been used.
• DNA polymorphisms were looked for and several were shown to be more common in these subjects compared with controls; these occur within genes of both the immune response [human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1, HLA-B, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1] and those involved in several other cellular functions (predominantly the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion).
• Interestingly, one particular single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) which is associated with symptomatic B19 infection occurs in the Ku80 gene which has recently been shown to be a B19 co-receptor. B19 persistence is probably the key to this phenomenon, and some new data are presented on short regions of sequence homology (17-26 bp) between human, mouse and rat parvoviruses and their respective hosts which occur in many host genes. This homology may provide a foothold for virus persistence and may also play a role in the genesis of disease through gene disruption.
• Finally, microarrays and TaqMan real-time polymerase chain reaction were used in 108 normal persons to study human gene expression in persons who are B19-seropositive versus B19-seronegative (age- and sex-matched) to examine the hypothesis that gene regulation may be altered in subjects harbouring the B19 virus DNA.
• Six genes were found to be differentially expressed with roles in the cytoskeleton (SKIP, MACF1, SPAG7, FLOT1), integrin signalling (FLOT1, RASSF5), HLA class III (c6orf48), and tumour suppression (RASSF5).
These results have implications not only for B19 but also for other persistent viruses as well and confirmation is required. In conclusion, these disparate findings contribute to our understanding of the pathogenesis of B19 disease. We are using these studies as a starting point to study the phenomenon of chronic immune activation following B19 infection.


Cytokines in Parvovirus B19 infection as an aid to understanding CFS

Researchers: Kerr JR, Tyrrell DA.43

Department of Microbiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK. j.kerr@imperial.ac.uk

Human parvovirus B19 infection has been associated with various clinical manifestations of a rheumatic nature such as arthritis, fatigue, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), which can persist for years after the acute phase. The authors have demonstrated recently that acute B19 infection is accompanied by raised circulating levels of IL-1b, IL-6, TNF-a, and IFN-g and that raised circulating levels of TNF-a and IFN-g persist and are accompanied by MCP-1 in those patients who develop CFS. A resolution of clinical symptoms and cytokine dysregulation after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, which is the only specific treatment for parvovirus B19 infection, also has been reported. Although CFS may be caused by various microbial and other triggers, that triggered by B19 virus is clinically indistinguishable from idiopathic CFS and exhibits similar cytokine abnormalities and may represent an accessible model for the study of CFS.


Multiple Co-infections (Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Human Herpes Virus-6) in Blood of CFS patients: Association with Signs and Symptoms.

Researchers: Nicolson GL, Gan R, Haier J.44

The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, California 92649, USA. gnicolson@immed.org

Previously found that a majority of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients showed evidence of systemic mycoplasmal infections, and their blood tested positive using a polymerase chain reaction assay for at least one of the four following Mycoplasma species: M. fermentans, M. hominis, M. pneumoniae or M. penetrans.

Consistent with previous results, patients in the current study (n=200) showed a high prevalence (overall 52%) of mycoplasmal infections. Using forensic polymerase chain reaction they also examined whether these same patients showed evidence of infections with Chlamydia pneumoniae (overall 7.5% positive) and/or active human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6, overall 30.5% positive). Since the presence of one or more infections may predispose patients to other infections, we examined the prevalence of C. pneumoniae and HHV-6 active infections in mycoplasma-positive and -negative patients. Unexpectedly, we found that the incidence of C. pneumoniae or HHV-6 was similar in Mycoplasma-positive and -negative patients, and the converse was also found in active HHV-6-positive and -negative patients. Control subjects (n=100) had low rates of mycoplasmal (6%), active HHV-6 (9%) or chlamydial (1%) infections, and there were no co-infections in control subjects. Differences in bacterial and/or viral infections in CFS patients compared to control subjects were significant.

Severity and incidence of patients' signs and symptoms were compared within the above groups. Although there was a tendency for patients with multiple infections to have more severe signs and symptoms (p<0.01), the only significant differences found were in the incidence and severity of certain signs and symptoms in patients with multiple co-infections of any type compared to the other groups (p<0.01). There was no correlation between the type of co-infection and severity of signs and symptoms. The results indicate that a large subset of CFS patients show evidence of bacterial and/or viral infection(s), and these infections may contribute to the severity of signs and symptoms found in these patients.


High Prevalence of Mycoplasma Infections Among European CFS patients. Examination of Four Mycoplasma Species in Blood of CFS patients.

Researchers: Nijs J, Nicolson GL, De Becker P, Coomans D, De Meirleir K.45

Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, KRO Gebouw-1, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussel, Belgium. jo.nijs@vub.ac.be

Prevalence of Mycoplasma species infections in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been extensively reported in the scientific literature. However, all previous reports highlighted the presence of Mycoplasmas in American patients. In this prospective study, the presence of Mycoplasma fermentans, M. penetrans, M. pneumoniae and M. hominis in the blood of 261 European CFS patients and 36 healthy volunteers was examined using forensic polymerase chain reaction. One hundred and seventy-nine (68.6%) patients were infected by at least one species of Mycoplasma, compared to two out of 36 (5.6%) in the control sample (P<0.001). Among Mycoplasma-infected patients, M. hominis was the most frequently observed infection (n=96; 36.8% of the overall sample), followed by M. pneumoniae and M. fermentans infections (equal frequencies; n=67; 25.7%). M. penetrans infections were not found. Multiple mycoplasmal infections were detected in 45 patients (17.2%).

Compared to American CFS patients (M. pneumoniae>M. hominis>M. penetrans), a slightly different pattern of mycoplasmal infections was found in European CFS patients (M. hominis>M. pneumoniae, M. fermentansz.Gt;M. penetrans).


CFS is Associated with Diminished Intracellular Perforin.

Researchers: Maher KJ, Klimas NG, Fletcher MA.46

Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33176, USA.

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an illness characterized by unexplained and prolonged fatigue that is often accompanied by abnormalities of immune, endocrine and cognitive functions. Diminished natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) is a frequently reported finding. However, the molecular basis of this defect of in vitro cytotoxicy has not been described. Perforin is a protein found within intracellular granules of NK and cytotoxic T cells and is a key factor in the lytic processes mediated by these cells. Quantitative fluorescence flow cytometry was used to the intracellular perforin content in CFS subjects and healthy controls.

A significant reduction in the NK cell associated perforin levels in samples from CFS patients, compared to healthy controls, was observed. There was also an indication of a reduced perforin level within the cytotoxic T cells of CFS subjects, providing the first evidence, to our knowledge, to suggest a T cell associated cytotoxic deficit in CFS. Because perforin is important in immune surveillance and homeostasis of the immune system, its deficiency may prove to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of CFS and its analysis may prove useful as a biomarker in the study of CFS.


Stress-Associated Changes in the Steady-State Expression of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: Implications for chronic fatigue syndrome and cancer.

Researchers: Glaser R, Padgett DA, Litsky ML, Baiocchi RA, Yang EV, Chen M, Yeh PE, Klimas NG, Marshall GD, Whiteside T, Herberman R, Kiecolt-Glaser J, Williams MV.47

Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, 333 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. glaser.1@osu.edu

Antibodies to several Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded enzymes are observed in patients with different EBV-associated diseases. The reason for these antibody patterns and the role these proteins might play in the pathophysiology of disease, separate from their role in virus replication, is unknown. In this series of studies, we found that:

• Purified EBV deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase) can inhibit the replication of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro and upregulate the production of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10.
• It also enhanced the ability of natural killer cells to lyse target cells.
• The EBV dUTPase also significantly inhibited the replication of mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes and the synthesis of IFN-gamma by cells isolated from lymph nodes and spleens obtained from mice inoculated with the protein.
• It also produced sickness behaviours known to be induced by some of the cytokines that were studied in the in vitro experiments. These symptoms include an increase in body temperature, a decrease in body mass and in physical activity.

The data provide a new perspective on how an early nonstructural EBV-encoded protein can cause immune dysregulation and produce clinical symptoms observed in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) separate from its role in virus replication and may serve as a new approach to help identify one of the etiological agents for CFS. The data also provide additional insight into the pathophysiology of EBV infection, inflammation, and cancer.


Dysregulated Expression of Tumour Necrosis Factor in CFS: Interrelations with Cellular Sources and Patterns of Soluble Immune Mediator Expression.

Researchers: Patarca R, Klimas NG, Lugtendorf S, Antoni M, Fletcher MA.48

E. M. Papper Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida.

Among a group of 70 individuals who met the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), 12%-28% had serum levels exceeding 95% of control values for tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, TNF-beta, interleukin (IL) 1 alpha, IL-2, soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R), or neopterin; overall, 60% of patients had elevated levels of one or more of the nine soluble immune mediators tested. Nevertheless, only the distributions for circulating levels of TNF-alpha and TNF-beta differed significantly in the two populations. In patients with CFS--but not in controls--serum levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1 alpha, IL-4, and sIL-2R correlated significantly with one another and (in the 10 cases analyzed) with relative amounts (as compared to beta-globin or beta-actin) of the only mRNAs detectable by reverse transcriptase-coupled polymerase chain reaction in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells: TNF-beta, unspliced and spliced; IL-1 beta, lymphocyte fraction; and IL-6 (in order of appearance). These findings point to polycellular activation and may be relevant to the aetiology and nosology of CFS.



CHRISTINE AND TANYA HARRISON
Secretary and Chairperson BRAME

Encs

References:

1. Bruce M Carruthers et al. (2003). Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Clinical Working Case Definition, Diagnostic and Treatment Protocols. Journal of CFS. Volume 11:1 2003: 7 – 115
2. Leonard A. Jason et al. (2005). Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Need for Subtypes. Neuropsychology Review. Volume 15:1 March 2005: 29-58
3. Jason et al (1999d). U.S. case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome: Diagnostic and theoretical issues. J. Chronic Fatigue Syndr. 5(3/4) 1999: 3–33.
4. Fukuda, K et al (1994). The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann. Intern. Med. 121 1994: 953–959.
5. Jason. et al. (2004). Comparing the Fukuda et al. criteria and the Canadian case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome. J. Chronic Fatigue Syndr. 12 2004: 37–52.
6. Peckerman et al (2003). Abnormal impedance cardiography predicts symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome. Am. J. Med. Sci. 326(2) 2003: 55–60.
7. Sieverling, Carol/Cheney April 2005. The Heart of the Matter: CFS & Cardiac Issues. http://www.cfids-cab.org/MESA/Cheney.pdf
8. Myhill, Sarah. CFS is Heart Failure Secondary to Mitochondrial Malfunction. http://www.drmyhill.co.uk/article.cfm?id=373
9. Lerner, AM et al (2004). Prevalence of abnormal cardiac wall motion in the cardiomyopathy associated with incomplete multiplication of Epstein-barr Virus and/or cytomegalovirus in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. In Vivo. 2004 Jul-Aug; 18(4):417-424.
10. Lerner, AM et al (1997). Cardiac Involvement in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as Documented with Holter and Biopsy Data in Birmingham, Michigan, 1991-1993. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 1997;6:327-333.
11. Streeton, David & Bell, David 1998. Circulating Blood Volume in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 4(1) 1998. Can also be found at: http://www.ncf-net.org/library/bell-StreetenJCFS1998.htm
12. Spence, V.A et al. Acetylcholine Mediated Vasodilation in the Microcirculation of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. 70 2004: 403-407.
13. F.P. De Lange et al 2005. Gray Matter Volume reduction in the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Neuroimage. 26 2005:777-781
14. Okada et al 2004. Mechanisms Underlying Fatigue: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. BMC Neurology. 4:14 2004
15. Greco & Costa et al 1997. Brain MR in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 18:1265-1269, August 1997.
16. Costa et al. 1995. Brainstem Perfusion is Impaired in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Quarterly Journal of Medicine (OUP). Vol. 88:11 November 1995:767-773.
17. Siemionow et al. 2004. Altered Central Nervous System Signal During Motor Performance in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Clinical Neurophysiology. Vol.115:10, October 2004:2372-2381.
18. Baraniuk et al. 2005. A Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – Related Proteome in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid. BMC Neurology. 5:22 2005
19. Natelson et al. 2005. Spinal Fluid Abnormalities in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. Jan 2005:52-55.
20. Lange, Natelson et al. 2005. Objective Evidence of Cognitive Complaints in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A BOLD fMRI Study of Verbal Working Memory. Neuroimage. Vol.26:2, June 2005:513-524
21. Gaab et al. 2002. Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Reactivity in chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Health Under Psychological, Physiological, and Pharmacological Stimulation. Psychosomatic Medicine. 64:2002, 951-962
22. Di Giorgio, Cleare et al. 2005. 24-Hour Pituitary and Adrenal Hormone Profiles in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine. May-June 2005;67(3):433-440.
23. Jerjes, Cleare, Wessely et al. 2005. Diurnal Patterns of Salivary Cortisol and Cortisone Output in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Affective Disorders. Aug 2005:87(2-3):299-304.
24. Segal et al. 2005. Disturbed Adrenal Function in Adolescents with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinol. Metab. Mar 2005;18(3):295-301.
25. Cleare et al. 2005. Brain 5-HT1A Receptor Binding in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Measured Using Positron Emission Tomography and [11c]WAY-100635. Biol Psychiatry. Feb 2005 1;57(3):239-246.
26. Torpy et al. 2004. Association Between Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin Gene ALA SER224 Polymorphism. Endocr Res. Aug 2003;30(3):417-429.
27. Kerr et al. 2005. Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells From Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal Clinical Pathology. 2005;58:826-832
28. Smith, Kerr, Cleare, Wessely et al. 2005. Association of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome with Human Leucocyte Antigen Class II Alleles. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2005;58:860-863
29. Vernon, Whistler et al. 2003. Integration of Gene Expression, Clinical, and Epidemiologic Data to Characterize Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2003;1:10
30. Vernon, Whistler et al. 2005. Exercise Responsive Genes Measured in Peripheral Blood of women with CFS and Matched Control Subjects. BMC Physiol. 2005 Mar 24;5(1):5.
31. Vernon, Steinau et al 2004. Differential-display PCR of Peripheral Blood for Biomarker Discovery in CFS. J Mol Med. 2004 Nov;82(11):750-5
32. Powell et al 2003, Identification of Novel Expressed Sequences, Up-regulated in the Leucocytes of CFS Patients. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Oct;33(10):1450-6
33. Narita et al 2003. Association between Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism and CFS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Nov 14;311(2):264-6.
34. Hickie, Lloyd et al 2001. A Twin Study of the Etiology of Prolonged Fatigue and Immune Activation. Twin Res. 2001 Apr;4(2):94-102
35. Gwen Kennedy 2003. Plasma Isoprostanes and Other Markers of Oxidative Stress in CFS
36. G Kennedy, V Spence et al 2005. Oxidative stress Levels are Raised in CFS and are Associated with Clinical Symptoms. Free Radical Biology & Medicine. 39 2005:584-589
37. Jammes et al 2005. CFS: Assessment of Increased Oxidative Stress and Altered Muscle Excitability in Response to Incremental Exercise. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2005; 257: 299–310
38. Suhadolnik et al 1997. Biochemical Evidence for a Novel Low Molecular Weight 2-5A-Dependent Rnase L in CFS. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 1997 Jul;17(7):377-85.
39. Nijs, De Meirleir et al 2003. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Risk Factor For Osteopenia. Medical Hypotheses. Jan 2003;60(1):65-68
40. Chia, JKS 2005. The Role of Enterovirus in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal Clinical Pathology. 2005;58:1126-1132
41. Lane et al 2002. Enterovirus Related Metabolic Myopathy: a Postviral Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry. 2003;74:1382-1386
42. Kerr, JR 2005. Pathogenesis of Parvovirus B19 Infection: Host Gene Variability, and Possible Means And Effects of Virus Persistence. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. Sep-Oct 2005;52(7-8):335-339.
43. Kerr, JR & Tyrell DA 2003. Cytokines in Parvovirus B19 Infection as an Aid to Understanding Chronic Fatigue Sydrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. Oct 2003;7(5):333-341
44. Nicolson et al 2003. Multiple Co-Infections (Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Human Herpes Virus-6) in Blood of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients: Association With Signs And Symptoms. APMIS. May 2003;111(5):557-566.
45. Nijs, Nicolson et al 2002. High prevalence of Mycoplasma infections among European chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Examination of four Mycoplasma species in blood of chronic fatigue syndrome patients. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2002 Nov 15;34(3):209-214
46. Maher, Klimas, Fletcher 2005. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is Associated with Diminished Intracellular Perforin. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. Dec 2005;142(3):505-511.
47. Glaser et al 2005. Stress-Associated Changes in the Steady-State Expression of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus: Implications For Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Cancer. Brain Behav Immun. Mar 2005;19(2):91-103.
48. Patarca, Klimas et al 1994. Dysregulated Expression of Tumor Necrosis Factor in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Interrelations with Cellular Sources and Patterns of Soluble Immune Mediator Expression. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Jan 1994;18 Suppl 1:S147-153
49.

Abstracts and links to their full papers, used in this document can be found at: http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed.

BRAME, 30 Winmer Avenue, Winterton-on-Sea, Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR29 4BA
Tel/Fax: 01493 393717 Web: www.brame.org E-Mail: info@brame.org


Oral Presentations
to
The Gibson Inquiry

by

Tanya Harrison
(Long-Term Severe ME Sufferer & Chairperson – BRAME)

and

Christine Harrison
(24 Hour Carer & Secretary – BRAME)

on
18 April 2006



Tanya Harrison – Chairperson BRAME
Parliamentary Research Inquiry into ME – Oral Hearing

Thank you for inviting us to speak to you today. It is impossible for me to get across to you in 4 minutes just how debilitating and life-changing this illness is for me, my family and fellow sufferers, as the only way you could possibly understand it is to live it.

Imagine being completely exhausted but unable to sleep, when you do manage to get to sleep it is not a deep sleep, it is snatched, restless, often the sleep pattern is reversed, and you are constantly being woken up by the pain. Then you wake up feeling like you have had no sleep at all, that you have the worst flu you have ever had, you are in excruciating and relentless pain, feeling as if you have just run a marathon, you ache everywhere, your throat is always sore and ulcerated, you are constantly nauseous and dizzy, unable to control your body temperature, have hyperacuity and photophobia, your brain is in a fog, and even having a hug is painful – this is the life of a person with ME, not just on the odd day, but every hour of every day, year after year, and for me, decade after decade

I would like to tell you some of my story. I am 30 and ME has taken, or rather stolen, two thirds of my life away. I have been bedridden for half my life. My ill health started at the age of ten when I got query glandular fever, the test was negative but the blood picture was unusual, around the same time I also suffered a gastro-intestinal infection. I am a Type-A personality, so I wasn’t going to stop a little thing like being ill keep me from my education and extra-curricular activities, which were numerous, so I insisted on returning to my normal life before I had recovered, but my body did not like this. I had constant recurring throat infections which the antibiotics weren’t clearing, in the end I had my tonsils removed but I reacted very badly to the anaesthetic. I developed asthma. Then aged 11 I had query meningitis, which is when the unrelenting severe head pain and photophobia started, and has never left me. The doctor didn’t understand what was happening and so I still did not heed my body and returned to school. Aged 12 the illness stepped up a gear and it started attacking my back and legs, leading to repeated spells using crutches, as it caused such pain to try and walk. Then the pain in my head and spine became so severe and debilitating, and the amount of time I was having to take off school became so frequent that I was unable to leave my bed. My doctor, finally, referred me to my local hospital, I was fifteen, It had been five years since I first became ill, with my GP constantly commenting that he “didn’t like the look of this, but didn’t know what is wrong or what to do about it”, so just left it. I truly believe that if my post-viral fatigue syndrome had been identified when it first appeared, as that is what I believe I originally had, had appropriate advice then been given, then I would probably not have developed ME, and not gone on to become severely affected, which is what happened by leaving me for five years.

When I reached the hospital I had become so desperately ill that I had reached collapsing point. I could barely stand, was in extreme pain, had a multitude of seemingly random but debilitating symptoms, and felt constantly as if I had a very bad bout of the flu. At the local hospital, I was put under a rheumatologist, he was brilliant, from the first time he saw me he told me that “he believed that I was very ill and that he wouldn’t stop until he had found out what was wrong”, sadly that is something that most people with this illness never have the fortune to hear. After seeing me weekly in his clinic, which was a trial in itself, leaving my bed to lay on the backseat of the car for the sheer agony of the journey, he could see that I was continuing to deteriorate and finally conceded that I was too ill to be at home and admitted me. By this point my illness, although undiagnosed, had already become multi-system/multi-organ, within three days I was seen by five specialists, as they feared for my life. Whilst in the hospital they thought I had suffered a mini stroke as I suffered from facial paralysis down one side, and since that time I have had limited or no reflex responses. Eventually I was diagnosed with a terminal illness. I was put on a heavy treatment regime of drugs and Graded Exercise (GET), which turned out to be totally inappropriate, and led me to deteriorate further, recognising this the consultant stopped everything and differential diagnoses were looked at. Eventually Dr Terry Mitchell, who although a consultant haematologist had started taking an interest in cases like mine, was brought in and I was diagnosed with severe and chronic ME.

In case you are wondering my symptoms have never left, only increased, they do go in cycles of severity, depending on what part of my body is particularly affected at the time, the core symptoms however have never gone away, or become easier. I am often too ill to even sit up, or even communicate and my Mum says that I am not really there, I have been swamped by the illness and am neither coherent, or very aware of what is happening around me. She says it is like watching me tread water, but when the illness consumes me, I have gone under and only the illness is left.

A lot is supposedly made of the fact that many results come back normal. This does mean that there are not abnormal results, I consistently have a high ESR level, and a high fibrinogen and platelet level, and low mean cell volume, other results fluctuate between normal and abnormal, for example my iron has just dropped again, last year it dropped to 2, this year to 4. For the iron deficient anaemia, this would be easy to handle for other people, but being an ME sufferer I have adverse reactions to medication, I can’t take iron tablets, and the doctor’s feel that a blood transfusion is more likely to kill me than help me, this leaves my health difficult to manage. My body does seem to have trouble absorbing vitamins and minerals and I find supplements difficult to tolerate, for example when my B12 level had dropped, The consultant gave me an injection of an 1/8th of a normal dose of B12, in hospital in case of side effects, but my body interpreted the injection wrongly and sent my body into spasms. I also had a bad reaction to oxygen, with the hypothesis of, and the research showing, low oxygen in the blood, particularly to the brain, the thought was to try extra oxygen to see if there was any improvement, so I was given 4% oxygen above the level we breathe, my body went into spasms, and the pain in my head became excruciating, this should not have happened, especially at that level, again showing the body’s hypersensitivity. My body has now become so compromised by the severe ME, that I have been told by two consultants that they felt unable to operate on me as they feared that my hypersensitivity would prove fatal, even trying to decide which is the safest local anaesthetic for urgent dental work has prompted a nine month consultation between specialists. This is the reality for the severely affected, the simple becomes complex and life-threatening.

Aside from the relentless pain, one of the hardest things for me, has been the impaired cognitive functions, going from being an avid reader to having trouble following even a page in a book, not recognising the words, as if it is written in ancient Greek, not remembering the sentence, or paragraph, I have just read. I also went from being a straight A student, to not being able to follow the simplest lessons, my brain having difficulty processing the information, as if I am having to translate it. I also started having trouble communicating, mid sentence forgetting my words, going blank, becoming muddled. These problems affected my education in that I was treated abominably by my school, who believed I was malingering – this is not unusual, resulting in children and young people with this illness, not being afforded the same assistance given to those with other chronic illnesses.

Everyday life is affected, siblings can’t play music or have friends round because of the sufferer’s sensitivity to sound, everyone lives in darkness, as the person with ME has photophobia. Everyone’s diet changes as the sufferer becomes unable to tolerate different types of food, or even the smell of food being cooked. Even something as simple as sleeping is difficult for the family, as the sufferer may be one of two types, either a hypersomniac or an insomniac, and even then, they will probably have sleep reversal, meaning a normal daily routine goes out of the window, and nothing can be planned, as it depends on the sufferer’s sleep pattern at the time. Cleaning is also difficult as they are often unable to tolerate the smells of the chemicals used to, for example, bleaching toilets or polish. Holidays, seeing family and friends, and special occasions are foregone, even sitting at the table and having a family meal is virtually impossible. In short ME is a drastic, and life-changing experience, for all those who are affected by it, not just the sufferer.
With ME family life is affected, financial problems are increased, for us personally, my mother had to give up a very well paid job 15 years ago in order to care for me 24/7, and with help being given to pensioners and children, there is very little help given to families, when a dependent disabled child becomes an adult, but still a dependent. There are particular problems being allocated benefits – particularly DLA, with over 50% initially being turned down, and then 80% of those being awarded the benefits on appeal. We also fear for increased problems with the proposed changes to Incapacity Benefit, especially given the unpredictable nature of this illness, fearing that people will be forced back into work before they are fit enough to do so, inducing a relapse, for fear of losing their benefits. Most of these problems originate from the Medical Policy Unit of the DWP taking the psychiatric viewpoint of this illness. As many here today are aware, we are currently challenging and redrafting their proposed new Clinical Guidelines for ME/CFS.

Help for people with this illness is few and far between, with patients and their carers still being met with disbelief and stigmatism by the medical profession, and in some cases treatment tantamount to abuse. There are a few good doctors, but most other doctors either refuse to accept or treat the illness, or they prescribe inappropriate management regimes. The forcing of patients into GET and CBT programmes is widespread in this country –one survey showed that 80% of people who had gone through GET had been made worse by the experience, much research has shown the bodies of people with ME react differently, and adversely, to exercise. The CBT which is widespreadly used is also inappropriate, as it perpetuates the psychiatric model. Instead of teaching coping mechanisms, as with other chronic illnesses, they instead focus on illness beliefs, aiming to convince sufferers that they remain ill, because they believe they have an organic illness, and if they change that belief they will get better. I don’t mean to be rude but this is complete and utter rubbish, the use of CBT and GET is shameful treatment of extremely ill people.

I was a member of the Key Group for the CMO Report on ME/CFS and worked hard to try and represent the patient’s voice, unfortunately I wasn’t able to sign up to the document because of the recommendations of CBT and GET. In relation to this Inquiry the report recommended 4 years ago that research was urgently needed in six areas. In reality, of these six, the only research that has been done is on the last recommendation, which would relate to the controversial PACE and FINE trials, which is putting millions more pounds into the psychiatric school of thought, into CBT and GET – the treatments the patients find the most harmful or unhelpful. Where is the promised money into research into the organic aetiology and pathogenesis of this illness, as called for by the report?

I know that my prognosis of remission, to any semblance of a normal life, is only 2%, this does not however stop me from being hopeful that I am in that 2%, or, that with appropriate research into the organic aetiology and pathogenesis of this illness, that in the near future, hope of a cure, or treatment, to improve my quality of life will be renewed.

ME, and its continuing mismanagement, is destroying the lives of all those affected by this illness, and we beg the group to become the starting point for the change and advances that are so desperately needed.

• Calling for the adoption of the Canadian Clinical Guidelines by both the clinical and research communities, and the end of the use of the Oxford Criteria.
• Calling for better treatment and services for patients with ME.
• Calling for research into the aetiology and pathogenesis of this chronic illness and
• Calling for the money to be provided to do this.

We no longer need empty promises that things will change, we need urgent action.



Tanya Harrison
Chairperson BRAME 18/4/06


BRAME
30 Winmer Avenue, Winterton-on-Sea,
Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR29 4BA
Tel/Fax: 01493 393717 E-mail: info@brame.org
www.brame.org


B R A M E
Blue Ribbon for the Awareness of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
30 Winmer Avenue, Winterton-On-Sea, Great Yarmouth,
Norfolk, NR29 4BA
Telephone/Fax: 01493 – 393717
Website: www.brame.org e-mail: info@brame.org

18 APRIL 2006

BRAME PRESENTATION – PART 1
TO PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH INQUIRY INTO ME/CFS

Before I start we would like to thank you for inviting us to speak today and we welcome the initiative and support for ME/CFS patients by Dr Gibson in setting up this long awaited inquiry into the research evidence of this devastating disease.

After two hours of hearing all the presentations, I’m sure that most of you are beginning to possibly have some insight into the physical and cognitive fatigue, that people with ME experience after just 5 mins. We would hope that we can possibly put in the odd punchline that may lighten the mood, but sadly the reality of living with this illness, and the impact it has on people’s lives, is so overwhelmingly dramatic that it is not possible to add any levity to our presentation.

ME/CFS has been classified as a neurological disease by the World Health Organisation since 1969, this is acknowledged by the Dept of Health, who state that ICD10:G93.3 is the only listing for this illness. ME/CFS is also listed by the CDC in America as a priority one illness alongside TB and AIDS. We urgently need to give this illness the same high priority in the UK, as sadly both the illness and the patients are still faced with disbelief and stigmatism.

ME/CFS is an acquired organic, pathophysiological illness that occurs in both sporadic and epidemic forms, affecting all socio-economic groups and all ages. In most cases ME/CFS is probably caused by a viral trigger, in conjunction with a compromised immune system, a genetic predisposition and environmental factors. The illness becomes for many a multi-organ, multi-system, illness.

ME patients will characteristically become symptomatically ill post-exertion, showing evidence of clinical neurocognitive, neuroendocrine, dysautonomic (eg orthostatic intolerance) cardiovascular and immune malfunction. Some researchers have shown neurological abnormalities, including reduction in grey matter, postural cardiac output abnormalities which correlate with symptom severity and reactive exhaustion, and many patients have lower blood volume and lower blood cell mass, highlighting what a disabling illness this is.

The latest advances in genetics with the human genome has helped advance research into the gene expression in ME/CFS patients, with one study finding up-regulation in 15 genes and down-regulation in one gene. These genes were found to be implicated with immune activation, neuronal and mitochondrial function. This is perhaps the most promising research to find a diagnostic test for ME/CFS, however funding is greatly needed, and at present is funded by small donations by charities and individuals – government funding is vital.

As with any other chronic diseases, ME/CFS patients experience varying levels of severity of their illness. But for the majority of patients, ME/CFS is a complex, debilitating and individualistic illness that can cause life-long disability, and in some cases, sadly, premature death. Studies have shown that less than 6% of adults return to their pre-illness level of functioning, whilst relapses can be on-going, or occur several years after remission.

The prognosis for the long-term severely affected is very poor, less than 2%, where ME can become a multi-system, multi-organ illness, and for some, there can be a progressive degeneration of organs, leading particularly to cardiac or pancreatic failure. There have been a number of cases now of severely affected young adults in their 20’s and early 30’s who have suddenly died of undiagnosed cardiomyopathy. It is vital that this group of severely affected patients are given the high-level of care and monitoring of their condition, as is afforded to those with other chronic illnesses, and the development of any complications or co-morbid conditions should be identified and monitored. However, at present, the severely affected have become lost in the system, a non-statistic, as they have been ignored and neglected, not just in research, but by the medical profession.

Just because something is unknown, does not mean that it does not exist, merely that science, is at present, unable to prove anything – as research techniques improve so the wealth of data of the biological discoveries about the illness grows. The main problem that people with ME have faced, is that doctors believe that because there has been no definitive aetiology and pathogenesis of this illness shown by research, then the illness must be psychosomatic, and so they treat patients with scepticism and disbelief, we must remember that they also thought this of Polio, and that MS was known as “Hysterical Paralysis”. The result of such attitudes can be traumatising, as they at best challenge the patient’s belief in an organic origin of their illness, and at worst can lead to patients being wrongly sectioned.

On 14 May 1998, at the BRAME meeting in Parliament, we highlighted the plight of a 15 year old boy, who was at that time forcibly removed from his home and locked away in a psychiatric unit, as he insisted he had an organic illness. Until the fight through the courts enabled him to go home again, he was held in that psychiatric unit for almost a year, obviously very unwell, unable to speak, or see, and forced to endure CBT and GET. He was so traumatised it took him 5 years before he spoke and recognised his mother again, and he still has an enormous fear of any medical professionals, or social workers, to this day.

8 years on nothing has improved, for we have just heard of more cases, one of another young man, in his early 20’s, with similar symptomology, locked away, and the mother of a young woman who continues to battle with the court system in a similar manner.

This style of patient care is wholly unacceptable and the evidence is disturbing enough, but recently a young woman has died, largely due to the consequences of being forcibly sectioned and locked away in a psychiatric unit. As the mother fought on behalf of her daughter, she too was threatened with being sectioned. This case is shortly to go to inquest, however the mother has given us permission to disclose to the Group that research on her daughter’s spinal cord showed that ‘there was unequivocal inflammatory changes affecting the dorsal root ganglia, which are the gateways for all sensations going to the brain through the spinal cord. The changes of dorsal root ganglionitis, seen in 75% of the spinal cord were very similar to that seen during active infection by herpes virus (such as shingles)’. A research paper is shortly to be published on this.

(NB: For any members of the Group, who read this statement, please keep the information about the research on the spinal cord confidential within the Group, until after the inquest on 13 June. The mother wanted the Group to hear this evidence)

The problem is that most research papers, although often published in leading medical journals, are not picked up in evidence based reviews, and so many of these papers are not included for debate, and there does appear to be a psychiatric bias, whilst patient evidence is completely ignored and is said to be invalid to their criteria.

Sub-grouping

There is an urgent need for sub-grouping as we believe that there is a spectrum of disorders, which share similar symptomology eg ME, CFS, PVFS, FM, MCS. At present these illnesses are all grouped together to form an unmanageable heterogenous group. It is clear that the current cohort of individuals diagnosed with ME/CFS is a diverse group, with varying disease course and disability patterns, offering limited understanding of the aetiology or pathology of the illness and its components when considered together. This makes any research difficult as it is complicating the identification of biological markers of the sub-groups and the results cannot be extrapolated for the wider ME population. Fukuda, who wrote the CDC criteria, had intended for his research criteria to incorporate sub-groups, but this has been ignored. The more specific Canadian Clinical Guidelines is the only Clinical Criteria, and is much more concise, and identifies a more homogenous group, permitting a clearer diagnosis of ME/CFS for patients.

Sub-grouping is the key to understanding how ME/CFS begins, how it is maintained, how medical and psychological variables influence its course, and in the best case, how it can be prevented, treated and cured.

As we have said many times, we feel the term CFS is an inappropriate and derogatory name for this illness, as the illness is so much more than fatigue. Our analogy was used in the CMO Report on ME/CFS, that it would be wholly and equally inappropriate to call Alzheimers – CFS – Chronic Forgetfulness Syndrome, as Alzheimers is a chronic and devastating illness, which is so much more than being forgetful

It is essential that ME/CFS is not confused with ‘chronic fatigue’, as with some research criteria such as the Oxford criteria, this opens up a large remit, and then includes all patients with fatigue as a symptom. For patients with ME, fatigue is not usually their main symptom, but one of many core symptoms, and although debilitating, is caused by pathophysiological exhaustion, involving immune system activation, channelopathy with oxidative stress, nitric oxide toxicity and orthostatic intolerance. Use of the Oxford Criteria in research must be stopped as it creates a too heterogeneous group, and incorporates a multitude of alternative diagnoses.

Subgrouping must be looked at, even if to start with there are only three categories; those without co-morbid conditions, those with co-morbid physical conditions and those with co-morbid psychiatric conditions.

If members of the Group have time to read only two papers fully from those we submitted, then we recommend the Canadian Clinical Guidelines on ME/CFS, and CFS the Need for Subtypes by Jason et al (2005). We feel that these are two of the best documents produced to date, giving an accurate an overall view of this illness.

We hope that the Group, in their concluding statements from this inquiry, will feel able to acknowledge the importance of the Canadian Clinical Guidelines on ME/CFS, to help medical professionals understand the complexity and chronicity of ME/CFS, and how best to manage their patients, and recommend its use within the NHS generally and PCTs, which would hopefully lead to the medical profession having a greater understanding of ME/CFS, and the impact this overwhelming, and complex illness, has on the patient, and their families.


NHS Services

Since Jacqui Smith MP, the then Minister at the Department of Health, on 12 May 2003 announced £8.5 million for new ME/CFS services within the NHS, we have written to her, and her successors, for this money to be allocated appropriately, and to support what ME/CFS sufferers have found to be good practice of management of ME/CFS. Unfortunately of the 12 new Clinical Network Co-ordinating Centres (CNCC) for ME/CFS, many of these are run by psychiatrists, who use CBT and GET as management of their patients.

Most ME sufferers feel that there are no real services for them and still seek support and information from the local and national ME groups. We often get calls from patients, even after attending the specialised clinics, who have felt they have still been met with disbelief in their illness, been seen by a psychiatrist, and just offered coping skills.

Most patients have already learnt to listen to their bodies, and pace themselves, or welcome help from specially trained OT’s, who understand the debilitating, complex and individualistic nature of the illness.

As we say in our literature the doctor’s role should be to ‘heal sometimes, relieve often, comfort always’. Even those who do acknowledge ME/CFS are often at a complete loss as to how to manage their patient’s symptoms, but saying to a patient with ME, as they would with patients with other chronic illnesses, for which there is no cure or effective treatment, that they believe in their illness, understand how ill they are, offer their support, and say that together they will work through this, would make living with this illness so much better.

ME patients have been met with so much injustice and inequality within the NHS over the years, they just want to be accepted, believed, and offered the same NHS services as is afforded to other patients with chronic disease. They need, especially the severely affected, a consultant lead to assess and manage their complex medical condition, not to have 12 clinics in England, some of which are run by psychiatrists, or a GP, with Occupational Therapists to help. There would be an outcry if this was the service offered to other chronic neurological diseases.


Conclusion

Patients urgently want and need research into the aetiology and pathogenesis of the illness, to try and understand what is going wrong in their bodies, and to hopefully find an answer to their illness, or a means of helping to control their multiple symptoms. To date any research into this area is funded by donations from ME groups and individuals and not by Government. ME is responsible for the longest absence from school, and possibly in the workplace. There is a real cost to the Government for benefits and medical services, and urgent funding is needed, from the Government, into biomedical research, to try and find an answer to this illness. But the very real cost is the extent of the suffering of ME patients, and the loss of years of their life to this life-changing, debilitating illness.

We sincerely hope that once you have heard all the evidence that you will appreciate the injustice and inequality within the NHS, social services and DWP that people with this illness face, and feel able to recognise and acknowledge the extent of the suffering of ME patients over so many years, and make relevant and helpful guidelines for urgent and quality research into the aetiology and pathogenesis of ME/CFS.

Those living with ME need the group to recommend

• The adoption of Canadian Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of ME/CFS throughout the NHS.
• Improved education and awareness of medical professionals on ME/CFS
• These two things combined would hopefully lead to improvement in the diagnosis, care and management of ME patients.
• Implementation of the CMO Report Research Recommendations from 2002, that stated research was urgently needed and
• Provision of the necessary funds for quality and appropriate research into the organic aetiology and pathogenesis of this illness.

It is time that this illness was recognised and acknowledged for the chronic, disabling and life-changing illness we all know it to be, and that the care and medical needs of the sufferers are urgently addressed. Hopefully the written and oral evidence presented to the Group, by ourselves and others, will help to make a very significant move forward in addressing the inequalities in biomedical research, and the care and medical services offered to patients with ME.

NB: CMO Research Recommendations four years ago in 2002 were:
• Elucidate the aetiology and pathogenesis of CFS/ME
• Clarify its epidemiology and natural history
• Characterise its spectrum and or/sub-groups (including age-related groups)
• Assess a wide range of potential therapeutic interventions including symptom control measures
• Define appropriate outcome measures for clinical and research purposes
• Investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different models of care

The research programme should include a mix of commissioned or directed research alongside sufficient resource allocation for investigator-generated studies on the condition.

Christine Harrison